Biotech / Medical | Biotech Valuation


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: rkrw who wrote (32614)10/14/2009 5:39:28 PM
From: Arthur Radley   of 40275
 
reuters.com 

Final rec........good day -- now hope the final decision isn't delayed.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (32615)10/14/2009 5:43:11 PM
From: Arthur Radley   of 40275
 
Vote...12-1 and 10-2 on both issues.

Headlines
.FDA Panel Backs Proposed Acorda MS Drug To Improve Walking
5:32 pm ET 10/14/2009- Dow Jones


By Jennifer Corbett Dooren
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--A Food and Drug Administration panel Wednesday backed a proposed Acorda Therapeutics Inc. (ACOR) drug to improve walking in patients with multiple sclerosis.
The panel said the drug, fampridine-SR, appeared to be safe and effective at increasing walking speed, although it noted the drug would likely work in about one-third of patients.
Specifically the panel voted 12-to-1 in favor of a question that asked if the company "demonstrated substantial evidence of effectiveness of fampridine as a treatment to improve walking in patients with multiple sclerosis." On a question that asked if "do you conclude that there are conditions under which fampridine could be considered safe," the panel voted 10-to-2 in favor. The votes amount to a recommendation that the FDA approve fampridine-SR. The FDA usually follows the advice of its panels but isn't required to do so.
In a statement, Ron Cohen, Acorda's president, said the panel outcome "was an important regulatory milestone."
Acorda's stock, which last traded at $16.74, was halted Wednesday during the meeting.
Cohen noted that walking impairment is one of the most common side-effect related to MS and said there's currently no FDA-approved treatment that directly addresses walking impairment.
Fampridine has been associated with a seizure risk at higher doses than the 10-milligram dose for which Acorda is seeking FDA approval. The panel said a lower dose of the drug should be studied but said the agency should allow the study to be conducted after the drug is approved and not prior to approval.
The FDA said one study of about 300 patients showed that 34.8% of patients receiving fampridine-SR had an improvement in walking speed compared to 8.3% in the placebo group. Patients were timed as part of a 25-foot walking test at different time points during treatment. Another study involving 237 patients showed 42.9% of patients in the fampridine group had an improvement in walking speed compared with 9.3% of patients in the placebo group.
But an agency reviewer said the "improvement in walking speed is of small magnitude and of uncertain clinical significance." Looking at the studies in combination, the FDA said about one-third of patients appeared to benefit from the drug.
The active ingredient in the drug, fampridine, has been compounded in pharmacies for more than 20 years and used to improve walking in a number of neurological conditions. The drug is currently not approved by the FDA for any use.
The FDA said data from the clinical trial of fampridine-SR at 10-milligrams given twice a day didn't show a difference in the seizure risk compared to patients treated with a placebo, or fake drug. However, the agency said in briefing documents prepared for the meeting that there was a tenfold increase in the risk of a seizure when the drug was dosed at 20-milligrams twice daily, "a concerning finding suggesting a narrow therapeutic index."
Multiple sclerosis is a progressive disease that involves damage to nerves controlling muscles and vision, and affects about 400,000 Americans. The condition causes the body's immune system to eat away at the protective covering of the nerves, or myelin, which disrupts the electrical signals between the brain and the rest of the body. Fampridine-SR is designed to help the body's electric signals to pass through by blocking potassium ions that leak from the damaged nerves.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Biomaven who wrote (32595)10/14/2009 6:28:35 PM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI2 Recommendations   of 40275
 
>It's my understanding that in non-inferiority trials, the general standard is to look at modified intent-to-treat rather than ITT. The reason for this is that if you have a lot of dropouts that never received any drug, then that increases the chance of incorrectly finding no difference between the groups on a strict intent to treat basis.<

Carrying this argument to its logical conclusion, a hypothetical useless trial in which every patient dropped out immediately after randomization—before even being treated—would trivially be statisg for non-inferiority on an ITT basis.

If ITT were the favored analysis in non-inferiority trials, it would introduce a potential bias in trial conduct insofar as bogus discontinuations could work to the sponsor’s advantage.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Arthur Radley10/14/2009 7:22:56 PM
   of 40275
 
usatoday.com 

USA Today is really expanding their business coverage with in-depth articles. The issue about orthopedic device makers might make one pause if they are invested in this market.

This one about off-shore bank accounts might make your blood boil, so venture here with caution.


usatoday.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: DewDiligence_on_SI10/14/2009 8:05:41 PM
   of 40275
 
Wyeth R.I.P. Here’s some quaint company history, including a major screw-up by Harvard:

investorshub.advfn.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Biomaven who wrote (32613)10/14/2009 8:27:30 PM
From: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL2 Recommendations   of 40275
 
>>And if someone is going to respond, you find this out quickly...

My wife was delighted with 4AP within hours of taking it.

After trying different combination of doses and different timing she has settled in at 5mg with breakfast and 5mg at dinner.

With that approach little or no annoying side effects.

When she took two doses at one time she had some problems. So depending on how well ACOR has done the SR, the 10mg might not work as well.

My intuitive sense is that a single 10mg SR dose would have a higher peak than two 5mg's* 11 hours apart.

ij

* Note that even the compounders do something to extend the release profile according to my wife's neuro and confirmed by the compounding pharmacy.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (32620)10/14/2009 9:40:47 PM
From: Biomaven   of 40275
 
>>compounders do something to extend the release profile

Have to believe that is hit or miss. Extended release is hard enough to do when it's designed-in to the product.

If they did the SR well, then it might well have a smoother PK profile than two half-doses of immediate release.

Peter


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Arthur Radley who wrote (32615)10/14/2009 9:45:00 PM
From: rkrw   of 40275
 
If it's delayed it will just be for the risk map REMS program. If at all i wouldn't expect a major delay.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Casaubon who wrote (32541)10/14/2009 11:54:35 PM
From: Skeeter Bug1 Recommendation   of 40275
 
>>Skeeter, it is likely that caloric restriction has some benefit, however, it should be noted that cancer cells have a compensatory mechanism for glucose uptake, which maintains ATP (a nucleotide necessary for cell proliferation) levels for cancer cells. Interestingly, ATP deficiency leads to reactive oxygen species (ROS), which play an important role in their ability to kill cells. Matrix deprived cells (ie certain cancerous clusters) are able to evade the lethal effects of ROS by upregulating glucose transport, which initiates fatty acid oxidation pathways to maintain sufficient ATP levels (for cancer cell survival/proliferation). The ROS lethality is abrogated by anti-oxidants! Thus, anti-oxidants such as NAC and Trolox restore cancer cell survival!

See the Sep 3 issue of Nature for the article by Joan Brugge, et al. It is amazing work!<<

Casa, working on taxes right now, will follow up in a few days when i recover from the trauma. the payment isn't so bad, it is wading my way through endless forms pointing to more forms that point to tables, etc...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Biomaven who wrote (32621)10/15/2009 8:31:08 AM
From: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL2 Recommendations   of 40275
 
>>Have to believe that is hit or miss. Extended release is hard enough to do when it's designed-in to the product.

Investigator IJF Study: I have a huge sample size, n=1, long study 2 weeks, a responder and product of a single compounder. The data is uniform.

;-)

I was skeptical that the compounded product would have a sufficiently long half life to allow practical dosing because I understood that 4AP had a relatively short half life (something like 3-4 hours). Both the neuro and the compounder claimed extended effect.

I was surprised that a single 5mg dose was still providing clinically significant benefit the next morning. At 5mg bid dosing (breakfast and dinner) there is continuous clinically significant benefit.

ij

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.