Biotech / Medical | Biotech Valuation


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: quidditch who wrote (25164)12/9/2007 10:55:44 PM
From: Biomaven   of 40272
 
I think there is some agency action due in the next few months?

I think that should be next few days, not months.

From a macro viewpoint, let's assume approval for this and the CR version. But in today's environment is there really a significant market opportunity for a sleep drug that is poorly differentiated from Ambien and Lunesta? (At least it's hard for me to see the labels being much differentiated).

Could only be effectively marketed by a big pharma (or I suppose Forest) and it's a very expensive arena in which to play. Further, there is Ambien-CR generic looming at some point. So it's not the approval that should be the real trigger here - it's the announcement of some sort of marketing partner.

I haven't looked at them in a while, so can't speak to valuation at all, or to their GnRH drug.

Peter

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Robohogs who wrote (25144)12/10/2007 6:05:54 AM
From: kenhott   of 40272
 
The information revealed by the FDA are negative. I will try to get into it later when I have more time. But thumbs up likely from the committee, but watch out after that. Likely a good vehicle for trading. Be a little careful about the upside from the committee vote.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (25148)12/10/2007 6:24:15 AM
From: kenhott   of 40272
 
OT- A great place for hungry sleepy people. Those Japanese are a bunch of fish huggers. :) Some of the best sashimi I have ever had was at a couple of the large fruit plantations in the Philippines where they catch some of these wonderful tunas off the coast and bring it straight up the hill to be served. Time distances all but still hard to beat in my mind. Can't forget the night breeze, the hill top view, the cold cold beers, the fire light and the great food. Oh, and the excellent pineapples, etc.... Wonderful memories.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: kenhott who wrote (25167)12/10/2007 6:43:14 AM
From: kenhott   of 40272
 
OT and OT- I am in Portugal for vacation and I would recommend to others as a place to visit. Things have changed quite a bit here since my last visit a decade ago... more sophisticated, more grown up. Probably all lost on me of course. Was at Prague last week, also a nice place to visit but pricey. But I am comparing it to years ago when the wall first came down. That was a great great deal back then. My poor american dollars are singing the blues next to the shiny euro. Wish I had a bulge of 500 euro bills like Jay-Z. :)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Biomaven12/10/2007 9:51:36 AM
   of 40272
 
These guys had a good NEJM article last week, accompanied by a supportive, if cautious, editorial. I can post abstract etc. if anyone would like:

Press Release Source: Theratechnologies inc.

Theratechnologies Estimates the Market Size for HIV-Associated Lipodystrophy is Between $811M and $1.3B in 2012
Monday December 10, 9:03 am ET

MONTREAL, CANADA--(MARKET WIRE)--Dec 10, 2007 -- Theratechnologies (Toronto:TH.TO - News) today presented its commercial evaluation of the HIV-associated lipodystrophy market based on updated market research performed by recognized third party agencies. The reported number of HIV patients for 2007 is 1.9M patients(i) in the US & Europe (G5) and this number is projected to be 2.3M patients in 2012, assuming a 3% CAGR. Combining the 2012 estimated prevalence for patients with HIV with the Company's updated market research figures, the number of patients with HIV-associated lipodystrophy, and more specifically lipohypertrophy, projected in 2012 is approximately 380,000 patients. Based on what is observed today, the projected 2012 market potential for the US and Europe for HIV-associated lipodystrophy is estimated in the range of $811M - $1.3B USD.

ADVERTISEMENT
"It is clear from these market numbers that a significant number of patients with HIV-associated lipodystrophy have very limited treatment options thus far and there is a real unmet medical need. Furthermore, we now understand that an injectable product, such as tesamorelin, will follow a typical reimbursement path from a payer point of view," commented Mr. Yves Rosconi, President and Chief Executive Officer of Theratechnologies. "We have gone through great efforts to produce robust research numbers by conducting high quality market research with reputable organizations. As the market is a dynamic place, we will continue to use such studies to refine our commercialization strategy as we move towards the market launch of tesamorelin," noted Mr. Rosconi.

Three independent market research studies were performed by third parties to explore the opinions of patients, physicians, and payers regarding a product, such as tesamorelin, as a treatment option for patients afflicted with HIV-associated lipodystrophy. The physician survey was conducted in the US and in five major European countries (G5). The objective of these studies was to obtain a better understanding of the lipodystrophy market. The purpose of the payer survey was to establish a reimbursement plan for tesamorelin to gain optimal coverage and to provide greater patient access.

Physician Survey

The 2007 US physician survey, conducted by Adelphi Research by Design, was a quantitative study involving 101 interviews statistically balanced by HIV-specialist and by region. In 2005, Theratechnologies had conducted a similar study with Verispan. In 2007, US physicians estimated that 34% of their patients have lipohypertrophy and the projected prevalence is showing a trend towards 38% within the next five years. This is in comparison to the reported prevalence of 26% in 2005. In addition to the 2007 US survey, Theratechnologies performed a survey based on 150 interviews with European physicians to establish qualitative trends in each country. Preliminary results in Europe are following the same trends as in the US where the current prevalence of lipohypertrophy is estimated at 28% and is anticipated to reach 33% within the next five years. In general, the management of HIV-associated lipohypertrophy in Europe and the US follow the same trends.

The updated data suggest 62% of patients are being treated with highly active anti-retroviral therapy and that the majority (80%) of HIV patients are exposed to protease inhibitors during their course of treatment. In addition, physicians estimated that the proportion of patients on protease inhibitors who develop lipohypertrophy will increase over the next five years. Interestingly, physicians noted that 18% of naive patients also develop lipohypertrophy. Theratechnologies believes that the results from the physican survey support a higher prevalence of lipohypertrophy and that it will increase over the next five years as more information becomes known about the serious complications associated with the disease.

HIV Patient Focus-Groups

This study was conducted with 27 HIV patients in 3 different major urban centers in the US. The study was conducted with small focus groups by an experienced moderator from VPMR LLC. The purpose of this survey was to capture awareness, perceptions, experiences and the unmet needs of patients. The majority of participants were being treated by antiretrovirals to control their disease. Over the course of their disease, patients changed drug regimens mostly due to drug resistance, intolerable side-effects, and a high pill burden. Those experienced with lipodystrophy indicated that it had a negative impact on their quality of life and that the side effects associated with lipodystrophy are significant. All patients who were being treated with HIV medications were covered by their insurance plans. In conclusion, the study shows that patients are aware of the disease and there appears to be demand to treat HIV-associated lipodystrophy to improve the quality of life and there is much interest in a product that reduces the increased cardiovascular risks associated with the disease.

Payer Survey

Boston Healthcare was mandated to conduct a focused reimbursement assessment to identify potential challenges and opportunities that tesamorelin may face with both private and public (Medicare and Medicaid) payers. The objective was to define a strategic plan for reimbursement with the goal of having optimal reimbursement coverage at launch. The survey was conducted using in-depth one-on-one interviews with 15 key decision makers across the major states in the US. According to Boston Healthcare, tesamorelin will follow a customary process to obtain reimbursement since responses from the payers were fitting for the reimbursement of a new product in a new indication. It is likely that most payers will provide reimbursement for a product such as tesamorelin to patients that need treatment providing that payers are assured that the medication is being used appropriately.

Theratechnologies recognizes that reimbursement is going to be critical for patients as well as optimal market uptake and views this exercise as an evolving ongoing process. Once Theratechnologies has a full product profile for tesamorelin it will conduct pricing and positioning studies which will be necessary to fully assess reimbursement penetration in the US. Education on HIV-associated lipodystrophy will be key as with any underserved market.

Archived Audio Webcast Information

Theratechnologies held today an Analyst Day meeting and an audio webcast to discuss its most recent HIV-associated lipodystrophy market research studies. A replay of the audio webcast will be available from December 10, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. to December 12, 2007 at 11:59 p.m. at the following links: www.investorcalendar.com or www.theratech.com.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Biomaven12/10/2007 2:11:30 PM
   of 40272
 
Couple of good blogs on the mortgage meltdown:

accruedint.blogspot.com 

calculatedrisk.blogspot.com 

Peter

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: nigel bates12/10/2007 2:52:30 PM
   of 40272
 
(OT politics)

I'm feeling good about my Obama position again.
A month or so back, his online odds had drifted from about 3:1 to around 6:1. If I'd had a little more cash and guts, I'd have added heavily to the position at that point, but lacking both, did so only modestly.
Given recent momentum, I'd now say he's actually more likely than Hilary to get the Democratic nomination, online odds notwithstanding.
I'm very tempted to increase the position.... comments ?

A straw in the wind:
bloomberg.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: nigel bates who wrote (25171)12/10/2007 5:13:18 PM
From: Biomaven   of 40272
 
Here is a great analytically-based article on his chances:

dailykos.com 

I think he will win Iowa, and that in turn will give him a significant boost in NH and South Carolina. That should be enough to make him a 50:50 shot or better to win overall.

I liked his recent line in a speech that he was going to release his "Kindergarten Papers." He should have called on all the candidates to follow suit. :)

His performances in debates are still very uneven. Sometimes I think he gets stuck in constitutional-law-professor mode where his brain simply refuses to process "answer yes or no" questions that don't have a binary answer.

The Republican side is all shook-up. I think Huckaberry will take the early states, but some of his more extreme positions from earlier times may come back to scare off the more moderate states. For example (also from dailykos):

dailykos.com 

Note to those unfamiliar with dailykos - it's predominantly a left-of-mainstream-Democratic-Party site with a mixture of some good analysis and "we should dump the Dems right now because they haven't impeached Bush yet" attitude. Edwards has been the favorite of most posters, followed by Obama, while Hillary is largely disliked - too close to centrist, establishment Dems. Good place to see what's buzzing among activist Democrats.

Talking Points Memo is the grown-up version:

talkingpointsmemo.com 

Peter

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Biomaven who wrote (25172)12/10/2007 6:40:19 PM
From: nigel bates   of 40272
 
Thanks, Peter, that was interesting.

I think that the perception that he has a chance of winning should start to shift the polls further in his direction.
FWIW, I'm going to overweight my Obama position, and look for a little profit taking ahead of Iowa. (Can't be riskier than any of my biotech positions.)

As or the Republican nomination, it seems to be a complete crapshoot. The only candidates I have any sympathy for are McCain and Paul, and I'm not going to be putting money on either.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: tom pope12/11/2007 9:58:07 PM
   of 40272
 
This is an excerpt from a WSJ article on the ABX. We were talking about the subject the other day and it's not really OT because of the importance of the effect of the sub prime mess on the overall market. (Not to mention that I agree with the thesis that the pendulum has wildly over corrected. ;-) :

Some analysts contend the value of some ABX indexes imply a catastrophic outcome for the subprime-mortgage market that might not materialize. For instance, Wachovia Capital Markets analysts Glenn Schultz and John McElvarey say declines in ABX indexes that track AAA-rated mortgage debt imply losses of around 49% among pools of subprime mortgages issued in 2006. Most Wall Street analysts forecast 10% to 15% in cumulative losses for 2006.

A cumulative loss of 49% would be achieved if all 2006 subprime mortgages default and recover just half their value after foreclosing on the homes, or if half default and recover nothing. As of August, the delinquency rate on all subprime loans was around 20%. For 2006 subprime mortgages, around 27% have already been paid down, many through refinancing, and 2% have defaulted.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.