Technology Stocks | Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Alden Pratt who wrote (233)6/12/1996 12:29:00 PM
From: Carlson   of 5854
 
Summer Lag in TEch Stocks?

The summer lag in tech stocks may be mostly psychological.

Years ago the US semi industry was prdominated by domestic sales and not much of that was for consumer electronics. Businesss slowed down for vacations and because demand tapered off. Many US electronics firms shut doen plants for a planned vacation. This allowed them to make some plant adjustments while production/processes were off-line. Noe the market for semis is much more global and diversified. Consumer PC and other domestically produced products run counter to a summer slowdown. US comapnies are competitive due to a lower dollar, more competitive products, leaner companies, and increased automation. As one industry executive told me recently; There is little incentive to move production of complex products overseas - with labor content down to 20% of what it once was due to automated assembly, lower wages is much less of a factor. We can produce as cheaply in the US as we can in Taiwan.

The summer lag perpetuates itself because of; 1] If winter and spring follow a typical boom pattern, then the industry pulls back as a normal flex in the supply/demand cycle. We have had a contracting winter and spring so the cycle is reversed from the "normal" cycle. 2] Analysts are creatures of habit. They look at five and ten year charts and say that a slow down is upon us. They said it last year and were wrong. They have been increasingly wrong about this over the years, but as a group have been slow to change their thinking. 3] The high tech investor "vacation factor" (my theory); High tech investors are more typically yupie types who are not as conservative as some investors. They also have active persoanl and family lives. They think about things other than investments during the summer and take vactions, spend money on vacations, cars boats, and other "toys". Analysts and brokers also can be put into the class of people who think more about spending than investing in the summer, They aren't pushing stocks because they are pushing golf carts around the greens. Tech stocks often go down in the summer because the buyers have dried up (check what volumes have done in summer months).

I think that the bad news of price declines and inventory gluts are largely behind us. A number of major new product cycles will help accelerate sales going into the Fall at the same time we are coming off the bottom of the down-turn. INfra-structure builds in telcom, Windows NT rollout, 3-D graphics/Intel P55-C rollouts, and a host of new products that are partially propelled by the very low priced memories that anguish the industry today will make the rest of '96 surprisingly good to semi, telcom, and other electronics investors.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Horacio G Lardo who wrote (231)6/12/1996 12:29:00 PM
From: Dantes   of 5854
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but if you take the recent increase in outstanding shares due to the conversion of debentures, LRCX has not broken its 52 week low in reality. The # of shares increased by about 8%, so assuming the Street keeps the P/E constant, the fact that LRCX broke 32 is not that big of a deal. AMAT came very close to its 52 week low in the past couple of days, as have NVLS and others.

I think technical analysis should consider the share increase to be the reason why LRCX broke new lows. I don't think the new lows indicate technical weakness. The weakness LRCX is feeling is the same weakness all semi equipment stocks are feeling. It will improve, you can only keep a good company down so long!

Regards

Dantes

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: lindalib who wrote (205)6/12/1996 12:42:00 PM
From: Carlson   of 5854
 
Linda, Don't Wait too long

The BTB has turned the corner which is very bullish because it is a ratio of $ booked v. $ shipped and is effectd by the large percentage of sales of DRAMS and SRAMS. The major mfgs. of RAMS and SRAMS are quickly cutting back production in order to push prices higher. This by itself will move the BTB up in the next few months. Meanwhuile the glut of inventory has been burned off. The psychology of electronics buyers can quickly change from that of comfort in ordering for immediate production to that of wanting to re-stock the shelves to assure that production isn't stopped due to the lack of parts. Electronics Buyers News latest issue warns buyers that RAM and SRAM prices will go up as produciton is being cut back. If you wer a buyer what would you do?

The charts look extremely good, the fundamentals look very good for comapnies like LRCX, LSI, etc. and the price and demand trend has definitly turned the corner.

The semi stocks are volotile to the upside as well as to the downside. If you wait too long the large percentage of the increase off of the present lows will be missed.

Happy investing!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Steve Jordan who wrote (232)6/12/1996 12:44:00 PM
From: Amir Shalit   of 5854
 
If you follow the news, the DRAM manuf. decided to reverse the
price decline by cutting production, expansions and putting off
new FAB plans. That's why LAM and all other semi equip. makers
earning are going to suffer.
Considering everything, including potential down earning for next
year, LAM is still a great buy due to the fact the after a down
cycle comes an up cycle.
I expect about 10 times return over the following 3 years.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Amir Shalit who wrote (237)6/12/1996 1:02:00 PM
From: fedhead   of 5854
 
What do you mean by 10 times return ? Are you saying that LRCX will be a $300 stock in 3 years. I hope you are right.

Anindo

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: fedhead who wrote (238)6/12/1996 1:50:00 PM
From: Amir Shalit   of 5854
 
LRCX at $300 is still less than AMAT market cap in '95 with $3B sales.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dantes who wrote (235)6/12/1996 2:47:00 PM
From: HB   of 5854
 
I think everyone knew about the existence of those convertibles,
and there existence was factored into per share earnings, revenue
figures etc... which were usually quoted "fully diluted", i.e.
as if these things were already converted. There is probably
little reason the conversion should have affected the share price.
(Except maybe for people who got their convertibles called selling
immediately).

Cheers,

Howard

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Amir Shalit who wrote (239)6/12/1996 3:35:00 PM
From: Amir Shalit   of 5854
 
Maybe not, considering the stupidity of LRCX shareholders...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Horacio G Lardo who wrote (231)6/12/1996 6:56:00 PM
From: Chia-Bin Wang   of 5854
 
Horacio,

Thanks for advice. I've decided not to pick up LRCX until it hit $28 something. It looks very weak near the end of the trade today. While AMAT, KLAC up 5%+, TNCR up 10%+. Maybe I'll go for EGLS at $14.5.
If I miss the low this time, I still have 1/5 of my portfolio
sitting on TNCR. I should make the most use of my only last 1/5 $$$. Other 1/5 on INTC won't be cashed soon.
Gotta save my $$$ for a rainy day. Good luck!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Chia-Bin Wang who wrote (242)6/12/1996 9:30:00 PM
From: Steve Jordan   of 5854
 
Does anyone have the slightest clue, newswise or gut feeling, as to why Lam gave back all its gains today while AMAT and NVLS managed to hold on. Just when I thought that we had turned the corner...Are we missing something when we focus on its p/e and p/book and p/sales??? Is there some insidious bit of fundamental analysis that we've missed but the market hasn't?? Why can't LRCX even manage to go up with the rest of the semi equipment stocks?? If I sound frustrated, I am. I had big hopes for today...Any ticker watchers out there who can explain the trading action that occurred as the price fell?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.