Biotech / Medical | GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: pz who wrote (5504)4/9/2012 10:05:52 PM
From: StockDung   of 5529
 
Other ZICAM bugus products need FDA attention:

=====================================================

consumerreports.org 

Subscribe to ConsumerReportsHealth.org and let us help you sort through treatment options, prescription drug facts vs. fiction, and put you in charge of your own health care.
June 2008

Homeopathic drugs
Look-alike medicines

READ THE LABELS If a drug is labeled homeopathic, you are not getting ingredients that have been reviewed or approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Two over-the-counter products, Seasonal ALLERGY Relief and Intense Sinus Relief, both made by ZICAM, promise to relieve hay-fever symptoms. Intense Sinus Relief contains oxymetazoline, a nasal decongestant the Food and Drug Administration has found to be safe and effective. The other ZICAM product is homeopathic; it hasn't been reviewed by the FDA and its active ingredients, including sulphur, have been diluted almost to vanishing.

But despite this major difference between the two products, our 11 mystery shoppers, who visited 52 drugstores throughout the U.S., frequently found them alongside each other on drugstore shelves. So consumers might mistakenly buy a homeopathic remedy when they're really looking for conventional medicine. That wastes money and might lead to inadequate treatment.

Homeopathy is a centuries-old form of medicine in which a substance that could cause symptoms is diluted until it becomes virtually undetectable. For example, the "active" ingredients in the homeopathic flu remedy Oscillococcinum are wild duck heart and liver, apparently because those organs are said to contain tiny amounts of the flu virus. The ingredients are so diluted, there probably isn't one molecule of them per package. Yet homeopathy's supporters say that infinitesimal amount can improve health.


UNproven results

There's little evidence to back up this notion, according to a 2005 meta-analysis in the Lancet of 110 placebo-controlled homeopathy trials matched with 110 trials of conventional drugs. A subset of large, high-quality studies showed that any benefit from homeopathic remedies was "compatible with" the effect of a placebo. An accompanying editorial said the findings were less surprising than the fact that debate over homeopathy continues, "despite 150 years of unfavorable findings."

The FDA is officially required to regulate homeopathic drugs, but a spokeswoman said the agency doesn't review those products and so does not approve them as safe and effective. That's partly because the items are so diluted that they're thought to pose little direct risk, she said.


confusion in the aisles

Even people who want homeopathic products might not get what they expect. Andy P. Bormeth, executive director of the Homeopathic Pharma-copoeia Convention of the United States, says that "official" homeopathic remedies should carry the initials HPUS, indicating that they conform to the organization's guidelines. Only four of 12 homeopathic products we checked were labeled that way.

In addition to Zicam's hay-fever products, we found homeopathic yeast pills sold next to a similarly packaged, FDA-approved drug for urinary pain. Nature's Cure sells its homeopathic and conventional yeast-infection remedies as a "combination pack." Drugstore representatives we contacted said they display the remedies together because consumers shop for products based on symptoms. But Michael Cohen, president of the nonprofit Institute for Safe Medication Practices, says, "It's misleading and potentially harmful to merchandise homeopathic remedies alongside conventional drugs." Relying on a homeopathic yeast-infection remedy instead of an FDA-approved drug could allow the infection to get worse.


WHAT YOU CAN DO

Check whether over-the-counter products are labeled homeopathic. If they are, don't buy them. There's not enough evidence to justify their use. If you do opt for one, stick with a product with the HPUS label. Be especially wary of homeopathic drugs that contain alcohol and are intended for children, since the FDA does not limit how much alcohol is allowed in these remedies.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: StockDung4/22/2012 8:11:54 AM
   of 5529
 
Matrixx hires new bunch of liars to tout Zicam

===================================================

Matrixx's Zicam Hires New Creative AgencyGrok succeeds Cramer-Krasselt on the businessBy Andrew McMains
  • April 11 2012
      Grok has added a homeopathic cold remedy to its account mix.

      The Zicam creative assignment came after a review in which there were four other finalists. Grok succeeds Cramer-Krasselt on the business.

      Major media spending on the brand totaled nearly $20 million last year, according to Nielsen. That figure does not include online spending.

      Zicam, a Matrixx Initiatives brand, comes in spray, chewable, gel and lozenge form. Other Grok accounts include a software company (Taleo), an air-conditioning brand (Luxaire) and a hair straightener (InStyler).

      The New York shop, which opened in late 2008, is led by former top executives at Saatchi & Saatchi—Tod Seisser and Julie Bauer—and Steve Landsberg, a former creative leader at DDB, McCann Erickson and Ogilvy & Mather. Seisser was chief creative officer at Saatchi New York from 1998 until 2004, and Bauer was CEO of the shop’s San Francisco office from 1995 until 2001.

      At Grok, Bauer is CEO and Seisser and Landsberg are co-CCOs.

      In hiring the agency, Matrixx CEO M’lou Arnett cited the shop’s creative ideas, strategic thinking and the “presentation of a unique category shift.” Arnett joined Matrixx in February from Scerene Healthcare, where she was chief operating officer.




    • Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung6/3/2012 12:13:08 PM
         of 5529
       



      Nasal Spray Makers Can't Blow Away Liability Case

      By JONNY BONNER


      (CN) - A lawyer deserves another chance to hold the makers of Zicam nasal gel liable for allegedly killing his sense of smell, a federal judge ruled.
      Michael Nelson, of California, filed suit pro se against Zicam and Matrixx Initiatives over their Cold Remedy gel swabs and spray. After using the products in 2006 and 2008, Nelson allegedly "felt an intense burning in his nostrils" and subsequently "lost his sense of smell," according to the court's summary of the complaint.
      Nelson claimed defective design; failure to warn; defective manufacture; fraud by intentional misrepresentation; fraud by false promise and concealment; and negligence in an amended complaint.
      The federal complaint in San Francisco alleges that the gels contained zinc, which studies have linked to smell loss, or anosmia.
      "Plaintiff specifically states that he applied the nasal gel spray to both nostrils," U.S. District Judge William Alsup wrote. "As a result of his use of the products, plaintiff alleges he has suffered a total and irreversible loss of his ability to smell and taste."
      Alsup dismissed some of the claims against Zicam and Matrixx last week, but said Nelson can move to amend the unsuccessful claims.
      "Defendants contend that the complaint fails to explain how the products deviated from defendants' intended result or design, or from other seemingly identical products," Alsup wrote. "This order agrees. ... The conclusory statement that defendants failed to manufacture the products 'in accordance with prevailing industry and scientific standards' cannot suffice to put defendants on notice of an alleged manufacturing defect."
      Nelson's claim of defective design fared better, however.
      "Defendants contend plaintiff fails to sufficiently allege a design defect claim because plaintiff does not provide a detailed explanation of what was defective about the products, plaintiff does not allege a 'nexus' between the alleged design defect and his injuries and, most importantly, plaintiff does not distinguish between the two products at issue in this action," according to the nine-page decision.
      "Though it is a close call, this order finds these allegations are sufficient to support a design defect claim under California law," Alsup wrote. "Under the 'ordinary consumer' standard, a product designed for intranasal use is expected not to cause irreparable injury to the nose if used in a foreseeable manner."
      Likewise, the concealment claim alleges that Nelson would not have used Zicam nasal gel products if he knew the risks.
      "It may be inferred that defendants concealed the unfavorable studies with fraudulent intent, for the purpose of making a profit; it may also be inferred that plaintiff, who was unaware of the studies or their results, would have acted differently had he known of the suppressed facts," Alsup wrote.
      But the judge was less favorable toward Nelson's claims for fraud by intentional misrepresentation and false promise.
      "Plaintiff's own exhibit expressly states that he does not know whether he ever read the warnings or directions on the product packaging or whether he followed those directions," Alsup wrote. "Moreover, the several statements in reference to homeopathic reduction of cold symptoms appear unrelated to plaintiff's alleged injury, which is not alleged to have resulted from the products' failure to reduce the severity of plaintiff's cold."

      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung6/19/2012 9:54:51 AM
         of 5529
       
      Nasal Spray Makers Can't Blow Away Liability Case

      By JONNY BONNER

      Wednesday, May 23, 2012Last Update: 7:58 AM PT

      (CN) - A lawyer deserves another chance to hold the makers of Zicam nasal gel liable for allegedly killing his sense of smell, a federal judge ruled.
      Michael Nelson, of California, filed suit pro se against Zicam and Matrixx Initiatives over their Cold Remedy gel swabs and spray. After using the products in 2006 and 2008, Nelson allegedly "felt an intense burning in his nostrils" and subsequently "lost his sense of smell," according to the court's summary of the complaint.
      Nelson claimed defective design; failure to warn; defective manufacture; fraud by intentional misrepresentation; fraud by false promise and concealment; and negligence in an amended complaint.
      The federal complaint in San Francisco alleges that the gels contained zinc, which studies have linked to smell loss, or anosmia.
      "Plaintiff specifically states that he applied the nasal gel spray to both nostrils," U.S. District Judge William Alsup wrote. "As a result of his use of the products, plaintiff alleges he has suffered a total and irreversible loss of his ability to smell and taste."
      Alsup dismissed some of the claims against Zicam and Matrixx last week, but said Nelson can move to amend the unsuccessful claims.
      "Defendants contend that the complaint fails to explain how the products deviated from defendants' intended result or design, or from other seemingly identical products," Alsup wrote. "This order agrees. ... The conclusory statement that defendants failed to manufacture the products 'in accordance with prevailing industry and scientific standards' cannot suffice to put defendants on notice of an alleged manufacturing defect."
      Nelson's claim of defective design fared better, however.
      "Defendants contend plaintiff fails to sufficiently allege a design defect claim because plaintiff does not provide a detailed explanation of what was defective about the products, plaintiff does not allege a 'nexus' between the alleged design defect and his injuries and, most importantly, plaintiff does not distinguish between the two products at issue in this action," according to the nine-page decision.
      "Though it is a close call, this order finds these allegations are sufficient to support a design defect claim under California law," Alsup wrote. "Under the 'ordinary consumer' standard, a product designed for intranasal use is expected not to cause irreparable injury to the nose if used in a foreseeable manner."
      Likewise, the concealment claim alleges that Nelson would not have used Zicam nasal gel products if he knew the risks.
      "It may be inferred that defendants concealed the unfavorable studies with fraudulent intent, for the purpose of making a profit; it may also be inferred that plaintiff, who was unaware of the studies or their results, would have acted differently had he known of the suppressed facts," Alsup wrote.
      But the judge was less favorable toward Nelson's claims for fraud by intentional misrepresentation and false promise.
      "Plaintiff's own exhibit expressly states that he does not know whether he ever read the warnings or directions on the product packaging or whether he followed those directions," Alsup wrote. "Moreover, the several statements in reference to homeopathic reduction of cold symptoms appear unrelated to plaintiff's alleged injury, which is not alleged to have resulted from the products' failure to reduce the severity of plaintiff's cold

      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung7/29/2012 5:35:47 PM
      1 Recommendation   of 5529
       
      Zicam Maker Coughs Up $4.5M to Settle Shareholder Action
      By Gavin Broady




      Law360, New York (July 27, 2012, 7:42 PM ET) -- Matrixx Initiatives Inc., maker of the cold remedy Zicam, has agreed to pay $4.5 million to settle an eight-year-old class action alleging the company violated securities laws by concealing reports that the medication may cause a permanent loss of the sense of smell, according to documents filed in Arizona federal court Friday.

      Matrixx and lead plaintiff NECA-IBEW Pension Fund have reached an accord that would bring an end to a long-running suit that traveled all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court before being remanded... law360.com 

      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung9/9/2012 2:34:28 PM
      1 Recommendation   of 5529
       
      ;;Zicam allergy snake oil spray still duping consumers.




      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung9/15/2012 5:34:38 PM
      1 Recommendation   of 5529
       
      SWOOP DOWN LIKE A GIANT CONDOR







      To: Mike M who wrote ( 5060)





























      2/13/2004 6:53:32 PM
      From: StockDung Respond to of 5510
      SWOOP DOWN LIKE A GIANT CONDOR

      It's entirely possible that it could be
      recalled one day! Think about it! That's never happened to a
      homeopathic remedy...ever!

      Think about how the media and Feds (FDA)
      could swoop down on this like a Giant Condor. On and on and on.

      ============================================

      Zicam® Induced Anosmia

      Bruce W. Jafek, MD
      Miriam Linschoten, Ph. D.
      Bruce W. Murrow, MD, Ph. D.

      Denver, CO

      Introduction: Zinc is extensively utilized throughout the body,
      supporting the activity of approximately 100 enzymes, the im-
      mune system, wound healing, the senses of taste and smell, and
      DNAsynthesis. Zinc supports normal growth and development.
      The deleterious effects of both deficiency and toxicity (acute and
      chronic) are described. Beneficial zinc absorption takes place via
      enteral, parenteral, or cutaneous routes. Direct application to the
      olfactory epithelium, on the other hand, has long been known to
      be toxic, producing anosmia. This toxicity is thought to be due to
      the direct effect of the divalent zinc ions on olfactory receptor
      cells. Apparently overlooking this toxicity, however, intranasal
      Zicam® (zinc gluconate) has recently been recommended as a
      treatment for the common cold.

      Methods: We will present a series of patients with post- Zicam®
      anosmia. The mechanism of drug toxicity will be analyzed.
      Results: While interindividual variation in drug response and
      drug toxicity is apparent, post- Zicam® anosmia appears to be
      dose- related and permanent.
      Conclusion: Zinc ions remain toxic to human olfactory epithe-
      lium, and continued reports of total, probably irreversible,
      anosmia, can be expected as long as intranasal zinc gluconate gel
      (Zicam®) continues to be used. The recent extension of the use
      of Zicam® to the pediatric age group is particularly alarming
      since this group is less likely to be able to describe the anosmia.
      Immediate discontinuation of the use of intranasal zinc recom-
      mended.

      "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
      — George Santayana (1863- 1952), noted philosopher

      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung10/10/2012 7:26:15 AM
      1 Recommendation   of 5529
       
      FINAL VINDICATION!

      The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (the “Court”) and the case is known as Siracusano v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 04-0886-PHX-NVW.

      The entity that leads the Litigation, NECA-IBEW Pension Fund (the Decatur Plan) is called the Lead Plaintiff, and the parties it sued are called Defendants. Defendants in this case are Matrixx, Carl J. Johnson, William J. Hemelt, and Timothy L. Clarot.

      NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

      If you purchased Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. (“Matrixx”) common stock or put or call options (collectively, “Matrixx Securities”) during the period between October 22, 2003 and February 6, 2004, inclusive (the “Class Period”), and are
      not otherwise excluded from the Class, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

      A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
      [...]
      More

      http://ktmc.com/files/pdf_settled/notice_480.pdf

      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung10/13/2012 6:29:57 AM
      1 Recommendation   of 5529
       
      Charles Hensley, Ph.D., and Itonis Pharmaceuticals Announce Anti-HIV Compound Targeting the Viral Entry Step





      IRVINE, CA, Oct 03, 2012 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- Itonis, Inc. (pinksheets:ITNS) and Charles Hensley, Ph.D., the inventor of the Zicam(R) Cold Remedy, and the founding President of Itonis Pharmaceuticals, are pleased to announce their second product offering since the formation of Itonis Pharmaceuticals as a division of Itonis, Inc. The new product offering, details of which will be revealed over the coming weeks, is an anti-HIV preparation that is based entirely on natural compounds.

      Dr. Hensley commented, "Along with the preparation for the anti-nausea product we recently announced, we have been perfecting our anti-HIV technology. One attractive aspect of this technology is that it targets the viral entry step that gives it a broad application base. It is very important to protect this intellectual property before disseminating the specifics of the compound. We expect the process of protecting this valuable technology to begin over the coming weeks."

      Itonis Pharmaceuticals recently announced that it will begin organizing clinical trials for its over-the-counter, systemically active anti-nausea preparation delivered via a nasal and/or sublingual spray for the alleviation of mild to moderate nausea. It also expects to begin organizing clinical trials for this new anti-HIV technology over the coming weeks.

      About Itonis, Inc. and Itonis Pharmaceuticals

      Itonis Pharmaceuticals is a new division of Itonis, Inc. that Itonis expects to convert into a new subsidiary. The division's mission is to create and market over-the-counter and prescription homeopathic products that better people's lives. These preparations will be categorized as derivative pharmaceuticals in that while the preparations will be both safe and effective, the path to market is faster than traditional pharmaceutical drugs. Dr. Charles Hensley is a pioneer in the development and marketing of safe and effective therapeutic nutraceutical and homeopathic preparations. He was a founder of Geltech, LLC that launched the Zicam(R) Cold Remedy, making the product a household name and forever changing the marketing and product placement paradigm for homeopathic drugs in the United States. Dr. Hensley and his team plan to use the same methodologies to revolutionize the treatment of several other common ailments and other chronic diseases.

      For information on Itonis, Inc., please visit www.itonisholdings.com .

      Safe Harbor:

      Statements in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the failure to complete successfully the development of new or enhanced products, the Company's future capital needs, the lack of market demand for any new or enhanced products the Company may develop, any actions by the Company's affiliates that may be adverse to the Company, the success of competitive products, other economic factors affecting the Company and its markets, seasonal changes, and other risks detailed from time to time in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The actual results may differ materially from those contained in this press release. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any statements in this press release.

      Contact: Michael Biddick Email Contact (949) 529-1588 SOURCE: Itonis, Inc.


      Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

      From: StockDung10/25/2012 5:56:16 PM
      1 Recommendation   of 5529
       
      Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations fda.gov 
      Enforcement Actions
      Warning Letters 2011

            Matrixx Initiatives Inc 6/3/11
            Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service
            Food and Drug Administration
            Los Angeles District
            19701 Fairchild
            Irvine, California 92612
            Telephone (949) 608-2900
            Fax (949) 608-4415

            June 03, 2011 W/L: 45-11

            CERTIFIED MAIL
            RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

            William J. Hemelt, President and CEO
            Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.
            8515 East Anderson Drive
            Scottsdale, AZ 85255


            WARNING LETTER

            Dear Mr. Hemelt:

            This letter is to advise you that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) has reviewed your firm’s website at www.zicam.com1. FDA reviewed your firm’s labeling and marketing information for the products “Zicam Cold Remedy RapidMelts with Vitamin C & Echinacea” and “Zicam Cold Remedy RapidMelts with Vitamin C” (collectively referred to as "RapidMelts Vitamin C products"). Based on labeling for these products and our review of your website at www.zicam.com, RapidMelts Vitamin C products are unapproved new drugs in violation of sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. §§ 331(d) and 355(a)). The RapidMelts Vitamin C products are also misbranded under section 502 of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352).

            Statements on the immediate container labels that document the intended uses of your products include, but are not limited to, the following:

            “Get over your cold faster”

            “Reduces duration and severity of a cold”

            “[R]educes severity of cold symptoms:
          • sore throat
          • stuffy nose
          • sneezing
          • coughing
          • congestion”

              Your RapidMelts with Vitamin C product is prominently labeled as containing zincum aceticum, zincum gluconicum, and vitamin C. Your RapidMelts with Vitamin C & Echinacea product is prominently labeled as containing zincum aceticum, zincum gluconicum, vitamin C, and echinacea. The front panel of the carton prominently states “RapidMelts with Vitamin C” and “RapidMelts with Vitamin C & Echinacea,” along with and in close proximity to the product line name (“Cold Remedy”) and the statements “Get over your cold faster” and “Reduces the duration of a cold.”

              In addition to the above statements regarding the intended uses of your products, your internet website at www.zicam.com2 includes similar statements and other statements related to these products’ intended uses, including:

              “Extra boost of Vitamin C in every RapidMelt.”

              “Extra boost of Vitamin C and Echinacea in every RapidMelt.”

              “Reduces the duration of cold symptoms when taken at the first sign of a cold.”

              “Now, I always keep Zicam with me and know I’ve dodged another cold or two since. Zicam is a lot easier to take and carry than my individual zinc, Echinacea & vitamin C tablets.”


              A. Unapproved New Drugs [§§ 301(d) and 505(a)]

              Based on these statements in the labeling and on your website, the RapidMelts Vitamin C products are drugs under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)), because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man, and under section 201(g)(1)(C) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(C)), because they are intended to affect the structure or function of the body of man.

              The intended use to reduce the severity and duration of the common cold and the duration of cold symptoms, renders these products drugs. Although vitamin C and echinacea could be marketed separately as dietary supplements, in this case they are combined with other drug ingredients. FDA’s position on the regulatory status of over-the-counter (OTC) drug products that combine drug ingredients with dietary ingredients in a single dosage form for drug indications has been described in five previously issued Warning Letters. [1] Where, as here, drug and dietary ingredients are combined in a single dosage form, the combination becomes a “drug” under section 201(g) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(g)). There is no provision in the Act, as amended by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (NLEA) or by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA), that exempts any part of the RapidMelts Vitamin C products from the scope of 201(g) of the Act. In addition, under section 201(g)(1)(D) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(D)), the vitamin C and echinacea used in combination with the other active ingredients listed in the “Drug Facts” panels for these products are also drugs because the vitamin C and echinacea are components of these finished drug products.

              Notwithstanding the fact that the labeling for these products and the related statements about them on your website identify the vitamin C and echinacea as inactive ingredients, the vitamin C and echinacea in the RapidMelts Vitamin C products are “active ingredients” under 21 C.F.R. § 201.66(b)(2) because, based on representations on your website (e.g., “Zicam Cold Remedy RapidMelts with Vitamin C & Echinacea . . . [r]educes the duration of cold symptoms when taken at the first sign of a cold.”) and product labeling (e.g., the prominent identification of the products as being “RapidMelts with Vitamin C” and “RapidMelts with Vitamin C & Echinacea,” along with the repeated references to “Cold Remedy,” “Get over your cold faster,” and “Reduces the duration of a cold”), the vitamin C and the echinacea are intended to furnish pharmacological activity or other direct effect in reducing the duration and severity of cold symptoms.

              The use of vitamin C for the treatment or prevention of the “common cold” was specifically evaluated under FDA’s OTC Drug Review [2] and was not included in the final monograph for Cold, Cough, Allergy, Bronchodilator, and Antiasthmatic Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Use (final monograph for OTC Cold Cough Drug Products) (see 21 C.F.R. part 341) because the evidence was insufficient to classify vitamin C as safe and effective for such OTC use. [3] In the 1976 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for OTC Cold-Cough Drug Products, FDA published the recommendations of the Advisory Review Panel on Over-the-Counter Cough, Cold, Allergy, Bronchodilator and Antiasthmatic Drug Products. In those recommendations, the Advisory Review Panel stated the following with respect to the use of vitamin C for treatment or prevention of the "common cold":

              The Panel is cognizant of the popular use of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) for the prevention or treatment of the "common cold." The Panel has reviewed the available data for the ingredient as a single entity and finds that the data are insufficient to permit final classification as safe and effective for OTC use in the prevention or treatment of the cold.

              41 FR 38312 at 38324 (Sept. 9, 1976)

              Because vitamin C is not generally recognized as safe and effective for reducing the duration and severity of the common cold, any drug product intended for such use that includes vitamin C as an active ingredient, alone or in combination with other active ingredients, is also not generally recognized as safe and effective. Accordingly, the RapidMelts Vitamin C products are new drugs under section 201(p) the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(p)) because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for their intended uses.

              Under sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 331(d) and 355(a)), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an application approved by FDA under either section 505(b) or (j) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(b) or (j)), is in effect for the product. Based upon our information, there are no FDA-approved applications on file for either one of the RapidMelts Vitamin C products. The marketing of these products without an approved application constitutes a violation of these provisions of the Act.

              We recognize that the labeling for the RapidMelts Vitamin C products identifies them as homeopathic drug products. The definition of “drug” in section 201(g)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)) includes articles recognized in the official Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (HPUS), or any supplement to it. Homeopathic drugs are subject to the same regulatory requirements as other drugs; nothing in the Act exempts homeopathic drugs from any of the requirements related to adulteration, labeling, misbranding, or approval. We acknowledge that many homeopathic drugs are manufactured and distributed without FDA approval under enforcement policies set out in the Agency’s Compliance Policy Guide entitled, “Conditions Under Which Homeopathic Drugs May be Marketed (CPG 7132.15)” (the CPG). As its title suggests, the CPG identifies specific conditions under which homeopathic drugs may ordinarily be marketed; thus, in order to fall under the enforcement policies set forth in the CPG, a homeopathic drug product must meet the conditions set forth in the CPG. The CPG defines a homeopathic drug as: “Any drug labeled as being homeopathic which is listed in the Homeopathic Pharmacopeia of the United States (HPUS), an addendum to it, or its supplements.” The CPG additionally states that “Drug products containing homeopathic ingredients in combination with non-homeopathic active ingredients are not homeopathic drug products.”

              Although zincum aceticum, zincum gluconicum, and echinacea are established homeopathic active ingredients included in the HPUS, vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is not a recognized active ingredient in the HPUS or any of the addenda or supplements. Furthermore, to our knowledge, vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is not listed in any recognized Materia Medica containing information on the preparation of homeopathic medicines.

              Therefore, vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is not considered a homeopathic ingredient, and the RapidMelts Vitamin C products are not considered homeopathic drug products under the CPG because they contain homeopathic ingredients in combination with non-homeopathic active ingredients. Accordingly, the policies set forth in the CPG for the marketing of homeopathic drug products do not apply to these products.

              B. Misbranding – Failure to Identify Active Drug Ingredients [§§ 502(e) and 301(a)]

              The RapidMelts Vitamin C products are misbranded under section 502(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352(e)(1)(A)(ii)), because their respective labels fail to identify vitamin C (ascorbic acid) as an active drug ingredient, and also because the labels fail to bear a statement of the quantity and amount of vitamin C in the product. See 21 CFR §§ 201.10 and 201.66(c)(2).

              “Zicam Cold Remedy RapidMelts with Vitamin C & Echinacea” is also misbranded under section 502(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act (21 U.S.C. §352(e)(1)(A)(ii)), because the label fails to identify echinacea as an active drug ingredient and also because the label fails to bear a statement of the quantity and amount of echinacea in the product. See 21 CFR §§ 201.10 and 201.66(c)(2).

              Your marketing of these misbranded products violates section 301(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 331(a)).

              C. Misbranding – False or Misleading Labeling [§§ 502(a) and 301(a)]

              Section 502(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 352(a)) states that a drug is misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular. The RapidMelts Vitamin C products are labeled as homeopathic, but for the reasons stated above, these products are not homeopathic. Your marketing of these misbranded products violates section 301(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a)).

              In addition to the violations discussed above, we would like to discuss adverse event reporting requirements for OTC drugs. Section 760(b)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 379aa(b)(1)) requires that a manufacturer, packer, or distributor whose name appears on the label of a nonprescription (over-the-counter or “OTC”) drug marketed without an approved application in the United States submit to FDA any report received of a serious adverse event associated with such drug when used in the United States. Under sections 760(c) and (d) of the Act (21 U.S.C. §§ 379aa(c) and (d)), serious adverse event reports received through the address or telephone number on the product label, and new medical information that is related to a previously submitted report and that is received within one year of the initial report, must be submitted to FDA within 15 business days of receipt of such reports and information, and must be submitted using the MedWatch form, which for mandatory reporting is Form FDA 3500A.

              During the periods of (b)(4) investigators from the FDA conducted inspections of Matrixx postmarketing adverse event reporting activities at its facility located at 8515 East Anderson Drive, Scottsdale, AZ. Agency personnel also inspected Matrixx’s contractor, (b)(4) located at (b)(4). These inspections were conducted to determine Matrixx’s compliance with the postmarketing adverse drug event reporting requirements of section 760 of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 379aa). Based on the inspectional findings and review of other submissions by your firm to the Agency, we conclude that Matrixx did not submit certain serious adverse event reports as required by section 760 of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 379aa). We acknowledge your responses dated May, October and November 2009. In your November 2009 response, Matrixx committed to submit reports of anosmia beginning with reports the firm received as of November 6, 2009, and to retrospectively begin reviewing and preparing reports received since December 22, 2007. We believe that your proposed corrective action plan is adequate and you are submitting reports as promised. However, we believe that a (b)(4) is warranted to further clarify your reporting requirements under section 760 of the Act to ensure that your firm sustains compliance with the reporting requirements going forward. Prior to the (b)(4) regulatory meeting, we expect Matrixx to provide a detailed status update since the last response dated November 2009.

              Conclusion

              The violations described in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations that exist in connection with your facility, or with your firm’s products. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to assure that your firm complies with all requirements of federal law and FDA regulations.

              You should take prompt action to correct the violations cited in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, prosecution or injunction. Other federal agencies may take this Warning Letter into account when considering the award of contracts.

              We request that you notify this office in writing within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of this letter. Your response should address the comments listed above and include examples of documentation showing that corrections have been achieved. If corrective action cannot be completed within 15 business days, please state the reason for the delay and the time within which corrections will be completed.

              If you no longer manufacture or market the products referenced in this letter, your response should so indicate, including the reasons that, and the date on which, you ceased production. Additionally, if another firm manufactures the products identified above, your reply should include the name and address of the manufacturer. If the firm from which you receive these products is not the manufacturer, please include the name of your supplier in addition to the manufacturer.

              Please send your reply to the attention of Dr. Raymond W. Brullo, Compliance Officer at the address below. We also recommend that you contact us within five days of receipt of this letter to schedule a regulatory meeting. If you have questions or concerns regarding this letter, please contact:

              Dr. Raymond W. Brullo, DPM, FAPWCA
              Compliance Officer
              FDA -- Los Angeles District (LOS-DO)
              19701 Fairchild
              Irvine, CA 92612
              Phone: 949.608.2918
              Fax: 949.608.4415


              Sincerely,
              /S/
              Alonza E. Cruse
              District Director
              Los Angeles District



              [1] See , http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm188361.htm3, http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2008/ucm1048456.htm4, http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2008/ucm1048083.htm5, http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2001/ucm178287.htm6, and http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2001/ucm178286.htm7.


              [2] We acknowledge that homeopathic drug products were excluded from the OTC Drug Review. 37 F.R. 9464, 9466 (May 11, 1972). However, as discussed below, FDA does not consider the RapidMelts Vitamin C products to be homeopathic drug products. Furthermore, we note that the final monograph for OTC Cold Cough Drug Products does not include any products in any dosage form containing zinc or any salt of zinc as their active ingredient.


              [3] See 41 F.R. 38312 at 38324 (Sept. 9, 1976); 67 F.R. 78158 at 78159 (Dec. 23, 2002).







              -


              -
              <!--mp_trans_add
              This website has been translated to Spanish from English, and is updated often. It is possible that some links will connect you to content only available in English or some of the words on the page will appear in English until translation has been completed (usually within 24 hours). We appreciate your patience with the translation process. In the case of any discrepancy in meaning, the English version is considered official. Thank you for visiting esp.fda.gov/tabaco.

              -->


              Page Last Updated: 06/09/2011
              Note: If you need help accessing information in different file formats, see Instructions for Downloading Viewers and Players.






            • Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
              Previous 10 | Next 10 

              Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.