Technology Stocks | Nortel Networks (NT)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Alex Chilton who wrote (10439)3/28/2001 11:50:24 AM
From: Scripts   of 14634
 
Anyone know what Sagawa's new target is for NT?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Scripts who wrote (10440)3/28/2001 2:12:25 PM
From: CVJ   of 14634
 
..||
..||
..||
_||_
.\**/
..\ /
..V

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: CVJ who wrote (10441)3/28/2001 2:16:10 PM
From: Bill   of 14634
 
Good news!

My TA now reveals a 100% probability that NT will not decline more than 13.53 from here. We've found a bottom!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (10438)3/28/2001 3:04:02 PM
From: SJS   of 14634
 
Ken,

Everyone is entitled to their definition. 20% is pretty major to me.

Steve

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bill who wrote (10442)3/28/2001 3:38:12 PM
From: Daniel G. DeBusschere   of 14634
 
Wow this is getting really ugly-
I lost my confidence in NT mgmt on the first warning and mentally made a note not to get back in regardless of what I thought about the rest of the company. Apparently, this attitude is spreading. The rest of the company is worth a hell of a lot more than $13.50 a share.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Scripts who wrote (10440)3/28/2001 6:42:30 PM
From: Clay Takaya   of 14634
 
Here are Sagawa's profit numbers for NT:

Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Paul Sagawa cut his 2001 earnings estimate to naught from 69 cents per share. ``As we do not expect meaningful reacceleration of telecommunications capital spending until late 2002 or early 2003, we are also reducing our 2002 earnings per share estimate from 75 cents to 33 cents,'' Sagawa wrote.

Particularly alarming is his prediction that meaningful reacceleration of telecom capex is not going to resume until late 2002.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: Clay Takaya who wrote (10445)3/28/2001 7:04:40 PM
From: zbyslaw owczarczyk   of 14634
 
if Sagawa prediction are so good why he was pushing Lucent
all the time on its way to 10$ ? (LOL)
He naively thinks that telecom spending is independent of economy abd % rate what is wrong.
Once % rate satrt to push economy by fall, he will be first to predict increase in capex.
Since BOD of ATT and WCOM just wfew weeks ago approved capex for 2001, I am now surprised that was little orders until recently:

"``We're starting to see a few encouraging signs, but we'd like to see those encouraging signs extend for several
weeks before we call it a trend. And that's why we're not prepared to issue a formal forecast for the balance of the
year.''
dailynews.yahoo.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (10446)3/28/2001 7:08:31 PM
From: zbyslaw owczarczyk   of 14634
 
from NT: "``We're seeing some symptoms of (a downturn in Europe),'' he said. ``Whether it goes and proceeds like the U.S. we
don't know, but we're certainly watching it very carefully... We're cautious about Europe at this time.''

after loosing to prominent contracts with BT and 360Network
in Europe, sure they want to blamed Europe for its weeknes there.

ZO

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: CVJ who wrote (10441)3/28/2001 7:29:51 PM
From: John Soileau   of 14634
 
The NT vs. LU debate has raged, and I'm sure it will continue. Right now, though the two have been about equally efficient at collapsing their share price. A LU dollar is now $15.28, a NT dollar is now $15.70 based on 52-week highs.
Sure glad I missed out on these two until very recently! Took a first NT position just today. Anybody think the LEAPS look good? Or foolish?
John

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Clay Takaya who wrote (10445)3/28/2001 7:39:51 PM
From: John Soileau   of 14634
 
<<Sanford C. Bernstein analyst Paul Sagawa cut his 2001 earnings estimate to naught from 69 cents per share.>>

Hey, many in this business would LOVE to have 2001 earnings of "naught"!

<< Particularly alarming is his prediction that meaningful reaccelleration of telecom capex is not going to resume until late 2002.>>

He hasn't been right in the past, why assume he starts now? I want huge amounts of very fast data NOW at home and on my cellphone. I don't want to wait until 2003 or so. There are what, 300 million or more of me that want the same thing NOW. What are the odds that infrastructure capex just sits still till then? And if it does, how will the LU and NT order book look in 2003?
John

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.