Non-Tech | James Cramer


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: cicak who started this subject6/14/2001 2:05:05 AM
From: Doc Bones   of 764
 
A New York Times Article on why Dave Kansas quit thestreet.com

Message 15940990

Doc

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Doc Bones who wrote (736)6/15/2001 2:34:29 AM
From: cicak   of 764
 
Wow !! - why are so many folks quitting thestreet.com ? EOM

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: James J. Cramer who wrote (282)3/2/2002 10:05:26 AM
From: StockDung   of 764
 
Book Review Talking Up His Own Book
Robert Lenzner and Victoria Murphy, 03.01.02, 7:10 PM ET

NEW YORK - Legendary hedge fund operator and confrontational television commentator Jim Cramer has been getting publicity from news that he's working on a juicy Wall Street story: his own biography. But the real dirt might be elsewhere.

In a soon to be released tell-all tale, former Cramer & Company employee Nicholas Maier accuses TheStreet.com's co-founder of using CNBC anchors and his own television appearances to promote stocks that he would promptly sell, making a quick gain on the upswing.

In Trading With the Enemy, to be published this month by Harper Business, Maier alleges that CNBC anchors Maria Bartiromo and David Faber were used like pawns to talk up stocks that Cramer's hedge fund had purchased. He did this by giving them heads-up on analysts' upgrades and downgrades in particular stocks.

Writes Maier: "We were the first firm most brokerage houses told such news [of upgrades and downgrades], and Jim decided to use this early-call status to help the reporters, who all wanted to break a story."

Maier goes on to explain that after the stocks were touted on television, Cramer would promptly dump the firm's position: "No sooner would Maria be thanking us for the help than we'd be getting a payback--a quick hit thanks to our friends at CNBC."

In one case, recalls Maier, Faber called Cramer and immediately Cramer demanded that the firm buy a hundred thousand shares of MCI Group (nasdaq: MCIT - news - people). "There will be news!" said Cramer's colleague to the broker at Goldman Sachs, who also purchased shares. No more than an hour later, Faber went on the air with news that telecommunications giant MCI was rumored to be an acquisition target. Maier admits he does not know what Faber actually told Cramer during their conversation and writes, "Reporters often called us, asking if we could confirm a rumor in the marketplace."

Cramer's own television appearances also were used to intentionally sway the markets in his favor, Maier writes. For example, while Cramer was on CNBC promoting "a great investment for the long term," Maier writes that Cramer's firm was making quick gains: "Our real strategy, however, was all about taking profits now. Back at the office, we were supposed to dump stocks after a quick half-point gain. On TV, Jim would tout a stock we owned, but if it moved up, we would sell."

"Jim would do the opposite of what he was saying on television," Maier told Forbes. Cramer did this behind the scenes too, says Maier. "He would hear rumors, pass them on and then do the opposite," adds the author, who insists that he has the trading documents to back up his claims. Maier worked under Cramer between 1994 and 1998.

Why put himself on the line? Not for a hefty book advance: "Mine is trivial compared with Jim's $1.5 million," says Maier. "My goal is to show people how Wall Street really works. It left a very bad taste in my mouth."

Cramer used investment banks to get quick gains too, according to passages in the book. Maier details playing pool with one analyst from Salomon Smith Barney who, while polishing off a third beer, hints that his firm was going to make a rating change on a specific company. Sure enough, by the time the stock had been upgraded to a "strong buy," Cramer & Company had purchased 50,000 shares--all executed with Salomon at the urging of the analyst, who said Salomon landed a cut on the trade.

Both sides had incentives to "leak" information. Cramer & Company made a quick profit, and the investment banks landed commissions on the trade.

This way, both sides had incentives. This kind of activity was widespread, says Maier: "Analysts at every one of the major brokerage houses were doing this."

Maier describes arrangements Cramer & Company made with the investment-bank underwriters of "hot" IPOs during the late 1990s: "Nearly all of the major investment banks made us commit to after-market orders, and they kept score …. This was their way of making sure hot deals stayed hot."

By buying ten times more shares than their allocation on the offering, Cramer & Company were helping to drive the price of deals even higher in the stock market. Maier writes that time after time, "I would give the brokerage house 50,000 shares to buy on top of the five [thousand] they gave us."

"It was the brokerage houses that created a facade of legitimacy to manipulate the situation, and ultimately it was the little guy at home, not fully comprehending the process, who bought these stocks at an assuredly inflated value," Maier writes.

Cramer is not new to accusations of recommending stocks in his own portfolio. In 1995, he was investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission for touting stocks that his firm held positions in. The matter ended with no action.

Cramer was unavailable for comment. Maier claims that Cramer twice attempted to legally thwart the book from going to press. The SEC also declined to comment on the book's allegations.

On Friday evening CNBC issued the following statement:

"CNBC has the highest journalistic standards in the business. Any insinuations about our reporters' journalistic practices have been any thing less than completely ethical are outrageous. These accusations are filled with innuendo and insinuation. They portray as improper, routine phone calls that may or may not have happened. David Faber and Maria Bartiromo have the utmost integrity. They have always operated with the highest of standards. We have discussed the accusation on the five pages we've seen with Jim Cramer and he has told us that these charges are completely unfounded and that they are leveled by a disgruntled former employee of his who he dismissed for poor performance."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: StockDung who wrote (738)3/3/2002 12:10:45 PM
From: AV8R   of 764
 
Looks like Cramer if finally getting his just rewards.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: AV8R who wrote (739)3/4/2002 10:34:45 AM
From: Ron   of 764
 
Here's the link from Forbes.. interesting:
forbes.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Ron who wrote (740)3/4/2002 2:22:32 PM
From: Snowshoe   of 764
 
Cramer responds...

"Random musings: A former employee of my hedge fund, Cramer Berkowitz, has written a book to seek revenge for my firing him in 1998 for his gross negligence in failing to carry out simple instructions. His book quotes me as saying outrageous things I never said (and would never say), meeting with people I never met and being the subject of investigations that never occurred. The book contains page after page after page of lies and innuendo. I am particularly outraged and saddened that in his effort to get back at me, the author has chosen to impugn the reputations of others in the investing and journalism community who did nothing wrong and have the highest integrity. When I decided to be a hedge fund manager and journalist at the same time, I realized that I had to disclose my positions when I spoke publicly and that I had to take precautions to insure that my firm's trading did not inappropriately benefit from my journalism. As even the author is forced to admit, each time allegations were made to the contrary, I was vindicated. At the end of 2000, I retired as a hedge fund manager, where my record of success speaks for itself. I continue as a television, radio, print and Internet journalist where my work is open and my viewers, listeners and readers can judge its quality, integrity and value. I don't intend to engage in a public debate with the author, which would only dignify his scurrilous fabrications and help him sell books."

thestreet.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Snowshoe who wrote (741)3/4/2002 11:43:25 PM
From: 10K a day   of 764
 
Why is the dude gonna' hammer him if it's not true ...
I mean Cramer might be a punk...but that doesn't make him a bad trader...

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: StockDung who wrote (738)3/16/2002 1:23:19 AM
From: EL KABONG!!!   of 764
 
Vindication???

thestreet.com 

Business Publisher Recalls Controversial Book

By TSC Staff

03/15/2002 06:50 PM EST


HarperCollins Publishers said late Friday that it is recalling the book Trading With the Enemy. The publisher said in a letter that the book written by Nicholas Maier, which alleged improper trading activities at the hedge fund formerly run by James Cramer, the co-founder of TheStreet.com (TSCM:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis), contained errors.

A letter from James A. Fox, senior vice president and general counsel for HarperCollins Publishers, said the publisher has stopped shipping the book from its warehouse and that remaining inventory from the initial printing will be destroyed.

The company also said it will be sending an error notice about a chapter in the book to retailers and media representatives who received copies of the book.

The error notice reads that " [O] n pages 177 through 180, there is a description of a transaction involving securities of Western Digital Corporation. Following publication of the book, it was determined that these pages contain erroneous information. Cramer & Company did not conduct any trading activity in Western Digital Corporation in reliance on inside information. The Securities and Exchange Commission never investigated any of Cramer & Company's trading activities in securities of Western Digital Corporation."

In a statement, Cramer said: "I am pleased that HarperCollins has decided to destroy all of its copies of a book concerning me that was published less than two weeks ago. I had previously stated that the book, which was written by a former, disgruntled employee of my former hedge fund, quoted me as saying outrageous things I never said (and would never say), meeting with people I never met and being the subject of investigations that never occurred. Today's action by HarperCollins vindicates my position that the book contained false and derogatory material that should never have been published."

KJC

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (743)6/13/2002 12:26:05 PM
From: StockDung   of 764
 
Jim is a Saint but TheStreet.com often never tells the whole story since their editor chops the stories.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: cicak who started this subject6/20/2002 9:24:26 PM
From: username   of 764
 
June 20, 2002
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

****** ***********
Chief Executive Officer
*** ******** *******

Dear Mr. *********:

I am the General Counsel of TheStreet.com, Inc. ("TheStreet.com"). We have
learned of a website known as ***
which we have reviewed. Upon investigation, we have learned that you are
the Chief Executive Officer of ***, the company
that owns and operates the *** website, and posts the materials
contained on it.

As you know, TheStreet.com is the publisher of the online financial
publication RealMoney.com, which is one of the web's most respected brands
for unbiased financial commentary. As you also know, RealMoney.com
features several columns each business day by James J. Cramer, who is a
contributor to TheStreet.com. TheStreet.com uses its well-known trademark
and trade name RealMoney.com to identify its online subscription
publication, located at "www.realmoney.com," and owns and controls the
copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary interests in and to its name,
and to the articles posted on that website, including those by Mr.
Cramer. TheStreet.com has not licensed to *** any copyrights,
trademarks, or other proprietary rights. *** has not asked
TheStreet.com to authorize or approve *** use of any copyrights,
trademarks, or other proprietary rights, and TheStreet.com has not given
*** such authorization or approval.

An e-mail sent by *** to subscribers of the *** contains a verbatim copy of an
article written by Mr. Cramer entitled "Giving Martha the Benefit of the
Doubt" and published by TheStreet.com in RealMoney.com on June 17,
2002. There can be no question of the deliberate intent on the part of
*** to reap the benefit of content published by TheStreet.com simply
by duplicating the contents of RealMoney.com, and the negative effect that
*** actions have had on TheStreet.com, of which *** is aware
and has at all relevant times been aware. The infringement and dilution of
TheStreet.com's copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary interests by
*** through the Subscriber Email has caused TheStreet.com irreparable
injury.

We demand that *** immediately cease and desist from any use of
material as to which TheStreet.com owns and controls the copyrights,
trademarks, and/or other proprietary interests, including, but not limited
to, any content of RealMoney.com and any columns by Mr. Cramer.

Your continued use of content from RealMoney.com following your receipt of
this letter may constitute willful statutory infringement, and may expose
you to punitive and/or exemplary damages, in addition to payment of
attorneys' fees and costs for TheStreet.com and Mr. Cramer.

This letter is without prejudice to any of TheStreet.com's or Mr. Cramer's
rights or remedies at law or in equity, all of which are specifically reserved.

Very truly yours,

Jordan Goldstein
Vice President and General Counsel

cc: Thomas J. Clarke, CEO, TheStreet.com, Inc.
James J. Cramer

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.