Strategies & Market Trends | Rande Is . . . HOME


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Rock_nj who wrote (57375)3/14/2006 3:51:37 PM
From: Bucky Katt   of 57583
 
Treasury Secretary John Snow warns Congress: US government's cash running out>>>>


Treasury Secretary John Snow urged Congress to set aside partisan bickering and raise the US national debt ceiling this week, or face a disastrous cash crunch for the federal government.

In a speech here to a conference of regional bankers, Snow said it would be inconceivable for Congress not to pass legislation on the debt limit before it heads into a recess at the end of this week.

"I am urging members of Congress in the strongest possible terms to resist coupling an increase in the debt ceiling with other issues," Snow said.

"Rather, they should vote to raise the ceiling this week. It would be unthinkable for them not to take action," he said, warning that the "full faith and credit" of the US government was too precious to be compromised.

Snow has issued increasingly urgent warnings to Congress that the statutory debt limit of 8.184 trillion dollars will be hit this week, and that the government will then lose its borrowing power.

Once the US government reaches the ceiling, it comes under threat of defaulting on its debts and can lose the ability to raise future credit on the capital markets.

Last week, Snow said new issues of federal debt instruments would only raise enough cash to keep government operations financed until mid-March.

But Democratic members of Congress are said to be balking at increasing the debt limit unless the administration of President George W. Bush, which has overseen a huge rise in the US budget deficit, curbs its appetite for funds.

"We have to remember that current federal borrowing needs today are simply the product of past decisions," Snow said in his speech.

"While we always welcome a debate on budget priorities, swift action on the debt limit must still be taken this week.

"There should be no doubt over whether the government will be able to pay its bills on time, this time next week."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (57407)3/15/2006 2:56:53 PM
From: Bucky Katt   of 57583
 
When the dollar dumps v the Ruble, ouch>
Dollar plummets nearly 20 kopecks ahead of U.S. economic update

MOSCOW. March 15 (Interfax) - The dollar plummeted almost 20 kopecks against the ruble on Wednesday as it weakened internationally on fears that the latest statistics will show that U.S. industrial growth slowed and investment in the country's assets declined in January.

Dealers said the Central Bank of Russia again strengthened the ruble against its bi-currency basket on Wednesday, also contributing to the dollar's slide.

By 11.20 a.m. local time, the dollar was down 19.5 kopecks to 27.835 rubles/$1 on the Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange (MICEX). Trading volume topped $1.11 billion, including Today and Tom deals.

The ruble hardly moved against the euro, trading at 33.5 rubles/ EUR1. pr

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bucky Katt who wrote (57407)3/16/2006 12:22:15 PM
From: Bucky Katt   of 57583
 
The Senate voted Thursday to allow the national debt to swell to nearly $9 trillion, preventing a first-ever default on U.S. Treasury notes.

The bill passed by a 52-48 vote. The increase to $9 trillion represents about $30,000 for every man, woman and child in the United States. The bill now goes to President Bush for his signature.

The measure allows the government to pay for the war in Iraq and finance Medicare and other big federal programs without raising taxes. It passed hours before the House was expected to approve another $91 billion to fund the war in Iraq and provide more aid to hurricane victims.

The partisan vote also came as the Senate continued debate on a $2.8 trillion budget blueprint for the upcoming fiscal year that would produce a $359 billion deficit for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1.

The debt limit will increase by $781 billion. It's the fourth such move _ increasing the debt limit by a total of $3 trillion _ since Bush took office five years ago.

The vote came a day after Treasury Secretary John Snow warned lawmakers that action was "critical to provide certainty to financial markets that the integrity of the obligations of the United States will not be compromised."

On Thursday, Treasury postponed next week's auction of three-month and six-month bills pending Senate action, though the move was likely to be quickly reversed given the Senate's vote.

The present limit on the debt is $8.2 trillion. With the budget deficit expected to approach $400 billion for both this year and next, another increase in the debt limit will almost certainly be required next year.

The debt limit increase is an unhappy necessity _ the alternative would be a disastrous first-ever default on U.S. obligations _ that greatly overshadowed a mostly symbolic, weeklong debate on the GOP's budget resolution.

Democrats blasted the bill, saying it was needed because of fiscal mismanagement by Bush, who came to office when the government was running record surpluses.

"When it comes to deficits, this president owns all the records," said Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "The three largest deficits in our nation's history have all occurred under this administration's watch."

Only a handful of Republicans spoke in favor of the measure as a mostly empty Senate chamber conducted a brief debate Wednesday evening.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said Bush's tax cuts account for just 30 percent of the debt limit increases required during his presidency. Revenue losses from a recession and new spending to combat terrorism and for the war in Iraq are also responsible, he said.

As for the $781 billion increase in the debt limit, Grassley said: "It is necessary to preserve the full faith and credit of the federal government."

Before approving the bill, Republicans rejected by a 55-44 vote an amendment by Max Baucus, D-Mont., to mandate a Treasury study on the economic consequences of foreigners holding an increasing portion of the U.S. debt.

At present, foreign countries, central banks and other institutions hold more than one-fourth of the debt, but that percentage is growing rapidly.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Rande Is who wrote (57402)4/9/2006 4:20:51 PM
From: tsigprofit   of 57583
 
Discussion of the weekend revelation that Bush is planning nuclear first stikes on Iran here:
Message 22341628

if anyone would like to join in.

I view this as a very dangerous development.

I was listening to a conservative talk radio host this last week, and he was saying that the government is supposed to get it's power from the people - yet I do not believe the American public would support an attack yet on another country - this time a nuclear first-strike.

This would make the US a pariah state.

What happens if the world embargoes oil to the US? What does that do to our economy?

And what if they stop lending us money on our massive debt?

What next, nuke China? Russia? N. Korea? Syria? France?

Where does the madness stop?

How long until the American people rise up and say ENOUGH - we want you out - someone else take over, be it Republican or Democrat.

I would support a forced resignation of Bush and Cheney and their administration at this point - with McCain taking over possibly, or Hastert as President.

We are sliding toward dictatorship with Bush at this point - and I am afraid he will so damage us, that we will not recover for decades.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: tsigprofit who wrote (57410)4/9/2006 4:25:33 PM
From: paret   of 57583
 
tsig--WHY are you dumping this garbage on Rande's thread?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Rande Is4/18/2006 7:31:45 PM
   of 57583
 
United Health Care CEO gets $1.6 Billion pay package. . . stock barely budges.
news.yahoo.com 
If such news came out at most any point during the 20th century, the stock would have tanked hard.

Oil reaches $71 a barrel. . . Dow makes a near 200 point record gain on interest rate exuberance.
news.yahoo.com 
money.cnn.com 
Again, the market should have shrugged off FED news and tanked on pre-Memorial day oil gouging.

Home sales falling, while prices remain high.
money.cnn.com 
money.cnn.com 
Market being held up artificially, in my opinion. The armor is well chinked. Thinking of selling out of real estate and taking a seat on the sidelines for a few years.

I remember a day in September when skies were clear and people complacent.

I am increasingly amazed at the level of political and commercial scams we allow ourselves to be suckered by. It is no wonder that Europeans laugh at American stupidity.

Heard of any good boycotts lately?

Anyway. . . . Not sure exactly what sort of bubble we are in today. But the attitudes are quite similar to what we saw in 1999-2001.

I'd like to hear all your views on this subject.

Rande Is

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (4)

To: Rande Is who wrote (57412)4/18/2006 7:59:32 PM
From: Gene C.   of 57583
 
yes on the sell out of real estate......but the market will climb that wall of worry....how can this be like 2000? All those folks who used to talk about the markets back then....are still out!! They will get back in at the next peak.....not even close yet......IMHO

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rande Is who wrote (57412)4/18/2006 9:11:49 PM
From: the navigator   of 57583
 
Rande,

I've always had a lot of respect for you but your post almost seems naive.

We are more concerned with the next American Idol than we are with the state of our country. We've been drugged with consumerism and our eyes glaze over as we chew the last of our MickeyD's and rush home to watch tellyvision.

The market is definitely being held up artificially, I believe the printing presses must be ablaze.

We are in for a helluvabout of inflation (signaled today by the Fed)

channels.netscape.com 

So a glance back to the 70's may be in order. All I can say is invest accordingly. BWDIK....

LJ

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rande Is who wrote (57412)4/18/2006 10:40:54 PM
From: xcr600   of 57583
 
you forgot to mention the Fed no longer releases M3 figures. hmmm..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: the navigator who wrote (57414)4/19/2006 9:49:33 AM
From: STEVE   of 57583
 
"So a glance back to the 70's may be in order. All I can say is invest accordingly. BWDIK...."

You really think interest rates will climb to the teens and hard assets will become all the rage?? I can't see that but I've been wrong before.

Real estate will vary by region as always. Affordability indexes are terrible in San Diego but not so bad in other places.

Stocks ( see Nasdaq) are nowhere near March 2000 levels and I think we've still got room to run if $3.00 gas doesnt kill things.

We need to get those hybrids rolling off the assembly lines and ban cars that get less than 20 miles per gallon. JMHO

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.