Technology Stocks | AT&T


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Lynn who wrote (4154)7/28/2007 7:20:12 PM
From: Paul Smith   of 4169
 
AT&T's "3G" data network is currently much smaller than both Sprint and Verizon's. Don't let AT&T tell you that their "edge" network is good enough. It is not. Currently, an EV-DO laptop modem card from Sprint or Verizon will have faster speeds in more locations than what AT&T offers.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Paul Smith who wrote (4155)7/29/2007 1:07:34 PM
From: Lynn   of 4169
 
Thank you, Paul, that was very helpful information.

I just checked Sprint's web site and mobile broadband coverage is not available right now and is not color coded for future coverage.

I am not even going to check with Verizon. There is no Verizon cell phone coverage at one of my two houses [both of which have tree problems for satellite and no DSL availability] so the likelihood of broadband availability should likewise be zilch.

I guess I shall just continue hobbling along with two phone lines for the time being. I tried call forwarding from one of my land lines to my cell phone for a few weeks, but it was not satisfactory. Since my cell phone number is in another area code, I was racking up land line long distance charges while wasting cell phone minutes.

Lynn

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lynn10/2/2007 10:45:48 AM
   of 4169
 
AT&T seeks slice of Indian market
By Amy Yee in New Delhi and Paul Taylor in New York
Monday Oct 1 2007 22:10

us.ft.com 

AT&T, the world's largest telecoms group, is seeking a licence to offer mobile services in India.

The US group, in partnership with India's Mahindra Telecommunications, joins companies vying for a slice of the world's fastest-growing mobile market of more than 200m subscribers.

AT&T's bid to enter India's mobile market represents the boldest international move to date by the US carrier, which has historically focused on the domestic US market. AT&T, which completed a US acquisition spree with the purchase of Bell South at the start of this year, has also applied for a mobile licence in Qatar.

The latest move follows a successful application by AT&T and Mahindra last year for a licence to provide fixed-line national and international service in India. While the current application is for a 2G mobile licence, AT&T said on Monday that, if successful, it plans to apply for a licence to offer more advanced 3G services.

Randall Stephenson, chief executive, signalled AT&T's interest in overseas expansion when he took over his current role this year identifying the Indian, Asian and markets as of particular interest.

Mr Stephenson visited India this summer.

India's Department of Telecommunications had set Monday as the deadline for mobile licence applications.

At least 100 companies are believed to be interested, including India's largest real estate groups DLF and Unitech; IT and media company Hinduja TMT; and Indian electronics group Videocon.

Foreign telecoms groups have been accelerating their investments after the Indian government raised the cap on foreign direct investment in telecoms operators from 49 per cent to 74 per cent.

That cleared the way for Vodafone, the world's largest mobile group by revenue, to buy control of Hutchison Essar, India's fourth-largest mobile operator, for $10.9bn in a keenly-contested battle earlier this year.

[The above was just posted to the, "India Stocks," thread here at SI]

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lynn12/11/2007 9:04:56 PM
   of 4169
 
Investor's Business Daily
Wireless Operators Tap Africa, Other New Markets For Growth
Friday December 7, 6:56 pm ET
Reinhardt Krause


In the dense forests of Papua New Guinea, hunters stalk their prey with the latest technology: cell phones.
Privately held Digicel expanded into the south Pacific island nation early this year. Mobile operators are rushing to expand in just-emerging markets where's there's still subscriber growth to be had.

Half the world's population now uses mobile phones. Even in some big emerging markets -- China, Russia and Brazil -- the days of big subscriber growth are over or winding down.

India, where 18% of the population uses mobile phones, is one exception. And wireless firms continue to flock there, including AT&T (NYSE:T - News).

Wireless penetration is still well below 30%, and in some cases 10%, in many parts of Africa, southeast Asia, central Asia and other remote areas of the globe.

In those markets, disposable incomes are low but growing.

By running lean networks, wireless firms have been churning out healthy profits where average per-customer revenues are $5 to $10 a month, analysts say.

There's a race to grab assets in still-developing markets where penetration rates are low, said Thomas Wehmeier, analyst at research firm Informa Telecoms & Media.

"The clamoring for emerging market assets has been driving prices for licenses and in acquisitions much higher, in some cases to ridiculous levels," said Wehmeier.

"Some of the acquiring companies have big war chests to go out there and seek assets."

The battle pits heavyweights such as Vodafone (NYSE:VOD - News), France Telecom (NYSE:FTE - News) and China Mobile (NYSE:CHL - News) against Millicom Cellular (NasdaqGS:MICC - News); newcomer Zain, formerly called MTC Kuwait; Russia's VimpelCom (NYSE:VIP - News) and Mobile TeleSystems (NYSE:MBT - News); America Movil (NYSE:AMX - News); Europe's TeliaSonera; India's Bharti; and other well-funded players.

Dozens of developing countries are expected to award wireless licenses in 2008, including "3G" licenses for high-speed networks.

Another route into emerging markets has been acquisitions. Valuations have jumped for small operators that already own airwaves.

Kuwait-based Zain has sent shock waves through the industry with its spending spree.

"There's been intense bidding in some areas of the world," said Kevin Roe, principal of Roe Equity Research. "Some of the bidding has seemed irrational. Zain has been involved in some crazy stuff."

In March, Zain agreed to pay $6.1 billion for the third wireless license in Saudi Arabia, beating out India's Bharti. Zain has spent some $9 billion since 2005 to expand in Africa.

With more stable governments and expanding economies, Africa has emerged as a key wireless battleground.

"Africa is very much the flavor of the year, a lot of newcomers are coming into the market," said Marc Buels, chief executive of Millicom. It operates in seven African markets as well as Latin America and Asia.

Paying By The Second

Luxembourg-based Millicom sells prepaid calling cards through a network of street vendors.

Millicom also charges per second, rather than per minute, to make wireless more affordable.

Rivals underestimate what's required to operate in Africa, Buels says. "It's a much different environment," he said. "It's not the same business model as Europe or even the Middle East."

France Telecom is aiming to double its subscriber base in Africa to 50 million in three years.

The company last month struck a deal to buy a majority stake in Kenya's No. 3 wireless firm. It's also the lead bidder for the majority of Ghana Telecom, say media reports.

In the Kenya deal, France Telecom paid more than $1,900 per subscriber, says Informa. That's double the $944 per user that Vodafone paid in India eight months earlier. In February, Vodafone bought a controlling stake in India's No. 4 wireless firm, Hutchison Essar, for $11 billion.

China Mobile backed off a deal to buy Millicom in mid-2006. But it still seems interested in Africa.

Reports surfaced in November that China Mobile has eyed a deal to take a stake in MTN Group, which operates in Africa and the Middle East. MTN denied the reports but could be a target, analysts say.

"MTN has operations in markets with over 500 million people with combined penetration of less than 30%," said Philip Kendall, analyst at Strategy Analytics. "There's significant room for growth there."

China Mobile expanded into Pakistan in 2006. It's prowling for more deals in Asia, analysts say.

Russian Expansion

VimpelCom and Mobile TeleSystems have expanded into Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and other neighboring countries. Kendall says the Russian wireless giants seem to have the inside track in acquiring wireless assets in central Asia. However Swedish operator TeliaSonera in July bought MCT, which has stakes in operators in Uzbekistan and other countries.

Vimpel is now targeting southeast Asia. It's in talks to create a joint venture in Vietnam, a country that's of interest to Millicom as well.

The Vietnam deal would give VimpelCom a stake in the country's No. 4 wireless firm.

About 30% of Vietnam's 85 million people use mobile phones. Plenty of potential customers are left, despite rising competition, says Vimpel CEO Alexander Izosimov.

"Market share is usually determined during the fat part of the S-curve," Izosimov said.

"Later in the penetration curve it is more difficult to redistribute market share from one play to another." He adds that VimpelCom still has a big opportunity to grow share in Ukraine and other markets.

Izosimov says VimpelCom plans to stick with a strategy of forming joint ventures rather than competing in costly auctions for licenses.

Roe says public companies need to be cautious amid the emerging market spending spree.

"Prices have been going up significantly," he said. "The challenge is to be a disciplined bidder for new license opportunities. Some of these operators are going to be hard-pressed to show a positive return on their investments."

Specialists Face Challenges

With nearly all big wireless firms eyeing tiny markets for growth, it's going to be harder for emerging market specialists, like Millicom, said Roe.

"Millicom has been able to pull a few rabbits out of the hat, like Congo and Colombia," Roe said. "But now it's much harder for them to fly under the radar and get assets on the cheap."

Millicom won't overpay, says Buels.

"Unlike the Vodafones, the France Telecoms of the world, who might be in a slow-growth situation in their home markets, we are in a position to be picky," he said. "We don't need to add assets at any price. We have plenty of growth coming from the 16 markets we are already in."

biz.yahoo.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Lynn who wrote (4158)12/11/2007 9:06:09 PM
From: Lynn   of 4169
 
Via Eric on the CSCO thread:

Big win for Cisco!

Dec 10, 2007 08:01:04 (ET)


SAN JOSE, CA, Dec 10, 2007 (MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) -- Cisco(R) (CSCO, Trade ) today announced that AT&T has selected the Cisco Carrier Routing System (CRS-1) as the core platform of its IP/MPLS backbone network. The AT&T network delivers voice, video, data and mobility services to residential and business customers worldwide.

"High availability and scalability are extremely important to AT&T as our customer base and service portfolios continue to grow," said Kaveh Hushyar, senior vice president, Network Planning & Engineering at AT&T. "The Cisco CRS-1 meets our and our customers' needs in this regard, and will help us continue to lead the industry in delivery of residential and business services."

The Cisco CRS-1 is designed to enable continuous system operation, unprecedented service flexibility, and system longevity. Powered by Cisco IOS XR Software, it also offers unprecedented system capacity. The CRS-1 marks a new era in carrier IP communications by powering the foundation for IP networks today while protecting investments for decades to come.

"We are extremely pleased that AT&T has selected the Cisco CRS-1 as the core of its multinational network supporting advanced IP services," said Tony Bates, senior vice president and general manager of the service provider technology group at Cisco. "We look forward to continuing to work with AT&T as its customer base and service portfolio continue to expand."

For more information about the Cisco CRS-1, please visit the Cisco Website: cisco.com 

For additional information and insight into Cisco service provider strategy, please visit the Cisco service provider blog, SP360: blogs.cisco.com 

Message 24122102

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Lynn12/14/2007 10:02:44 AM
   of 4169
 
Article mentions T is bidding on a license in Qatar:

Qtel eyes Asia in major expansion

DOHA: Qatar Telecom (Qtel) plans more acquisitions in Asia and Middle East after its $3.7 billion purchase of a Kuwaiti operator and is mulling sales of shares in Qatar, depositary receipts in London or bonds as funding options, its chief said.

Qtel, has $5bn in outstanding bank loans after its takeover in March of National Mobile Telecommunications (Wataniya), and financing costs have dragged on profits in the past two quarters.

Qtel is looking to buy Asian and Arab operators and licences and expand its fixed-wireless and corporate enterprise data businesses as it pushes out of Qatar, which is dismantling the last Arab telecoms monopoly.

"We need to have the capacity to do further acquisitions," chief executive Nasser Marafih said.

"The leverage we have would limit our capability to do further acquisitions and expand from where we are," he said.

Qtel's debt was about 3.8 times equity at the end of the third quarter.

The company's financing options include selling shares to existing investors in Qatar or more global depositary receipts in London, where it has a secondary listing, Marafih said. It could also sell bonds or use profit from new operations to pay off debt.

Qtel posted a second straight quarter of declining profit in July-September as financing costs surged. Wataniya's share of profit covered less than half of Qtel's debt financing costs.

"We are actually a bit highly leveraged now," Marafih said, adding he was talking to banks about financing options.

"On a long-term basis, definitely we will have to look at the equity options," he said, declining to give a timeframe.

Qtel, which operates in 16 markets, is looking to buy in the Middle East, North Africa and Asia, Marafih said, but would not name any countries.

The company bought a 25 per cent stake in Asia Mobile Holdings, a unit of Singapore's Technologies Telemedia, in January.

Mobile phones would initially be the main growth driver but Qtel's long-term emphasis will be on broadband and fixed wireless because of limited penetration in the region, he said.

Unlike Etisalat and Zain, Qtel is not interested in Africa's sub-Saharan market, which Marafih said was becoming crowded.

The company is bracing for competition at home, where the government is poised to sell a mobile phone licence to one of 12 bidders including Etisalat, AT&T and Vodafone.

Average monthly revenue per user in Qatar, which contributed three quarters of Qtel's profits in the third quarter, would likely decline gradually from $80-85, Marafih said. He does not expect a price war with the new operator because tariffs are already competitive.

Qtel is not in talks on a new venture with Saudi Telecom, the largest publicly traded Arab telecom firm, he said, responding to newspaper reports that the operators were working on a tie-up.

[Posting #106 on Africa - The Wireless Frontier thread]

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Sam Citron12/14/2009 11:18:32 AM
2 Recommendations   of 4169
 
AT&T Takes the Blame, Even for the iPhone’s Faults [NYT]
By RANDALL STROSS
nytimes.com 

I LOVE my iPhone. I just wish it were matched with Verizon Wireless, the carrier with the most envied reputation as fast, ubiquitous, reliable, nigh perfect.

Consumer Reports has just released its annual survey of cellphone service, and its respondents collectively agree with me about the rankings: AT&T occupies the bottom and Verizon, the top.

My sense of Verizon’s superiority is confirmed every time I see a “there’s a map for that” Verizon commercial, graphically showing how far more extensive Verizon’s 3G network coverage is in less populated areas. And it is reinforced when AT&T executives publicly confess — as Ralph de la Vega, the chief executive and president of AT&T mobility and consumer markets, did last week at an industry conference — that the company’s wireless service in New York and San Francisco was “below our standards.”

When I set about looking for independent data, however, to confirm the superior performance of Verizon’s network, I was astonished to discover that I had managed to get things exactly wrong. Despite the well-publicized problems in New York and San Francisco, AT&T seems to have the superior network nationwide.

And the iPhone itself may not be so great after all. Its design is contributing to performance problems.


Roger Entner, senior vice president for telecommunications research at Nielsen, said the iPhone’s “air interface,” the electronics in the phone that connect it to the cell towers, had shortcomings that “affect both voice and data.” He said that in the eyes of the consumer, “the iPhone has the nimbus of infallibility, ergo, it’s AT&T’s fault.” AT&T does not publicly defend itself because it will not criticize Apple under any circumstances, he said. AT&T and Apple both declined to comment on Mr. Entner’s assessments.

Neither AT&T nor Verizon was willing to reveal its internal data on performance. But Global Wireless Solutions, one of the third-party services that run network tests for the major carriers, shared some of its current findings. The service dispatches drivers across the country with phones and laptops equipped with data cards. They have covered more than three million miles of roads this year, while running almost two million wireless data sessions and placing more than three million voice calls, said Paul Carter, the president.

The results place AT&T’s data network not just on top, but well ahead of everyone else. “AT&T’s data throughput is 40 to 50 percent higher than the competition, including Verizon,” Mr. Carter said. AT&T is a client and Verizon is not, he added.

More evidence that AT&T’s data network is head-and-shoulders above Verizon’s comes from Root Wireless, a start-up in Bellevue, Wash., that is developing software for consumers to install on their smartphones to do continuous network tests. This generates empirical data for consumers who “today are buried under opinions and advertising slogans,” said Paul Griff, the chief executive. Root Wireless has no business relationship with any carrier.

This year, Root Wireless ran 4.7 million tests on smartphones for each of the four major carriers, spread across seven metropolitan areas: Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles/Orange County, New York, Seattle/Tacoma, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Washington. In every market, AT&T had faster average download speeds and had signal strength of 75 percent or better more frequently than did Verizon. (A Verizon spokesman declined to comment about these test results or those of Global Wireless Solutions.)

I asked Ron Dicklin, chief technology officer at Root Wireless, how these results, showing AT&T as the clear leader, could be reconciled with the negative appraisal of Consumer Reports’ respondents. He explained that his company’s tests of AT&T’s data network were done with handsets other than the iPhone, which does not allow non-Apple programs like his to run in the background.

AT&T’s besting of Verizon in these tests is all the more remarkable considering the sudden jump in the volume of mobile data that its network has had to handle with the introduction of the iPhone 3G in 2008: approximately 4,000 percent.

Chetan Sharma, a telecommunications consultant whose clients have included AT&T and Verizon, said that when the network and the handset were improved, customers “just used it all the more.” AT&T didn’t anticipate the rate of growth and didn’t upgrade fast enough in some markets, he said. “Other operators have the luxury of watching and learning from AT&T,” he said, “which has the most number of next-generation smartphones, with full browsers and built-in video players.”

The data seem incontrovertible: AT&T, while meeting 4,000 percent growth in data use, has acquitted itself quite nicely. But the company is saddled with an awful public image as the perennial laggard.

AT&T and Apple could both gain by swapping talent.

Apple, send your marketing wizards to lend your partner a hand. It sorely needs help.

AT&T, send some engineers to redesign the iPhone to make better use of the country’s fastest wireless network.

Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: stross@nytimes.com.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sam Citron who wrote (4161)12/14/2009 2:02:42 PM
From: Jeff Hayden1 Recommendation   of 4169
 
This Apple vs AT&T network problem is kind of weird. It's a problem for BOTH of them. They need to get together and fix it. The main hang-up (no pun intended) is dropped calls. What's the problem? Fix it!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Peter Dierks12/30/2009 11:38:48 AM
   of 4169
 
Broadband Blockage
Why wireless carriers are running out of capacity.
DECEMBER 30, 2009.

Nationwide, holiday sales over the Internet rose by 15.5% this year. But some New Yorkers who tried to purchase iPhones online were out of luck. Late last week, AT&T, which sells the device, began blocking orders through its Web site. Sales resumed Monday afternoon without an official explanation from AT&T of what happened, but an underlying problem still needs to be addressed.

AT&T previously acknowledged that its network has been overwhelmed by iPhone users in New York and San Francisco, where dropped connections and long waits for running programs are not uncommon. These data-hungry cell phones compete for bandwidth with broadcast TV, radio and Wi-Fi networks, and wireless carriers like AT&T and Verizon say that they're running out of capacity.

We're told that the situation in New York City over the weekend had mostly to do with AT&T underestimating iPhone demand. But unless policies for allocating spectrum become more conducive to new technologies, turning away potential customers could become more frequent.

The reality is that the demand for mobile broadband is exploding, thanks to the popularity of the iPhone and rivals like the Palm Pre, the Blackberry and Verizon's Droid. According to the Federal Communications Commission, the use of smart phones has grown by nearly 700% the past four years, and mobile data are increasing at a projected rate of 130% annually as more people use their phones to send photos and watch videos.

Spectrum is finite, but it doesn't need to be as scarce as it is. The problem is how the frequencies are being managed. Less than 10% of the spectrum coveted by wireless carriers has been allocated for commercial use. Much of the rest is controlled by the government. Television broadcasters and satellite companies also possess excess spectrum that could be made available to wireless carriers. Competitive bidding is the best way to allocate spectrum, but the government auctions are much too infrequent—only two in the past four years—and the licenses often come with cumbersome restrictions. The result is congested networks, frustrated customers and slower innovation.

Legislation sponsored by John Kerry and Olympia Snowe in the Senate, along with Henry Waxman and Rick Boucher in the House, would mandate an inventory of available spectrum to identify bands that are unused or underused. It's a good place to start.

online.wsj.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (4163)12/30/2009 12:02:18 PM
From: Paul Smith   of 4169
 
Mostly Bull Sh*t - AT&T has plenty of spectrum that they have not put into service including their 700 MHz spectrum and their AWS spectrum.

Perhaps it is as simple as realizing that AT&T is just not well run?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.