SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Non-Tech | Derivatives: Darth Vader's Revenge


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Worswick3/7/2012 10:36:21 AM
   of 2341
 
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has covered world politics and economics for 30 years, based in Europe, the US, and Latin America. He joined the Telegraph in 1991, serving as Washington correspondent and later Europe correspondent in Brussels. He is now International Business Editor in London. Subscribe to the City Briefing e-mail.




And the losers from Greek CDS contracts are… German


By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard EconomicsLast updated: March 7th, 2012

44 Comments Comment on this article


Clinging to my naive faith in the integrity of contracts, I assume that ISDA will soon trigger the credit default swaps on Greek debt. This will happen once Athens activates its retroactive law to coerce bondholders (the Collective Action Clauses).

If that does not do the job, Greece's Swiss franc bonds most likely will, since they do not permit any bond exchange under the terms of the contract.

Here is a chart from Paulo Batori at Morgan Stanley on winners and losers. It does include the hedge funds.



As you can see, RBS will make a tidy packet for the UK taxpayer. The claim that Anglo-Saxon banks are heavily exposed will probably prove false.

Unicredit and smaller German banks may have a problem. But that has no macro-economic importance. German savers will transfer a little extra money to nimble-footed funds around the world.

Don't blame the hedge funds who wrote the contracts. Blame the fools who thought they could juice up their short-term profits by writing this form of insurance on terms that were so far removed from Greek fundamentals.

All in all, I think the CDS saga is a red herring. The sums are very small. It is a different matter for Italy and Spain, of course.

If the Greek contracts are not triggered, it will destroy the CDS market for sovereign debt. It will deter investors from buying any Club Med bonds if they cannot take out reliable and easily-traded insurance at any time.

So Spain and Italy had better pray that ISDA does its job properly.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: axial3/12/2012 6:34:44 AM
2 Recommendations   of 2341
 
MF Global [1] - Do they Think We Are Stupid?

' Imagine for a moment that MF Global was your bank. One day you woke up and discovered that the account holding your college savings was gone. Poof! The money in your retirement accounts and related checking accounts had just been “vaporized.” You go to ask the bank where you money is and you are locked out of the bank while strangers who are not depositors are allowed to enter and take assets from the bank, including the contents of the “safe” deposit boxes. You finally hear from the bank and the authorities, who essentially say that while they can see all the transactions of the bank over the last month, for some reason, there is just no longer any trace of the money, and no explanation of what happened. The funds just “vaporized.” And after a few weeks of minimal information dribbles, you hear the search has gone cold. You are told the money disappeared in a chaotic tsunami of transactions and there is no evidence of any criminal actions. But, if money happens to get found, you might get some of it. Oh, and the contents of your safe deposit box are going to be auctioned off, with only a portion of the funds returned to you (this was the fate of the unlucky souls who held gold and silver bars on deposit in their own name with MF Global). That’s all…talk to you later. Good bye and good luck.

How would you react? Would the notion that your money “vaporized” elicit outrage?

Welcome to the MF Global case, one that is currently being swept into the tangle of questionable bankruptcy litigation and under the media rug.

In Criminal Investigations, Shouldn’t The Witnesses to a Crime And Suspects Be Interviewed Before a Case “Goes Cold”

In the case of MF Global, claims of customer “seg funds” being “vaporized” and the “case going cold” are made without investigators interrogating the primary suspect and individual in charge, former MF Global and Goldman Sachs President, New Jersey Senator & Governor, Jon Corzine. As the New York Times reported[1] last week, “…authorities have yet to interview key witnesses — including a person who is believed to have transferred client funds in the firm’s final days.” Yet around the same time, Reuters reports: “Criminal Probe Trial going cold at MF Global.”[2] '

More: go2managedfutures.com 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: axial who wrote (2089)3/12/2012 6:41:53 AM
From: axial   of 2341
 
MF Global [2] - But Of Course It's Not One Giant Cess Pool Now Is It?

'I came across a very interesting open letter to Jamie Dimon via the financial sleuths over @ZeroHedge. The piece was penned by one time fawning, bootlicking, groupie turned sober adult James Koutoulas. The crux of the letter surrounds douce-bag extraordinaire Dimon and JP Morgan's role in the MF Global swindle but I want to bring your attention to a somewhat of an sideline appetizer piece to the article if you will.

"Through my role as the co-founder of the Commodity Customer Coalition and pro bono counsel for some 8,000+ customers whose property it looks like your institution may be holding without their consent, I have loudly advocated for JPMorgan Chase to return this property. In response to this, rather than doing the right thing, you closed all of my personal and corporate bank accounts and my personal credit card. I have been told by multiple members of the media that JPMorgan Chase has called them and stated that if their media outlet has me on television again, that JPMorgan Chase will pull their advertising from the offending network."

Take a minute and read that last line again for me. Now think about buffoon extraordinaire Cramer's admonition "of course he's not a hack he's been on CNBC before". Think about Quintanilla's question to serial ponzi-ist Allen Stanford "Whats it like to be a billionaire". Think about all the grovelling and ass kissing of the D.C. and Wall St. oligarchy by the boobs and boobs in chairs from the propaganda network CNBC. JPMorgan will pull their advertising from the offending network if they have someone on again?!

Really! But of course it's not one giant cess pool now is it?

Yes this is how cronycapitism functions as it extorts what it wants from the puppets in Washington and their servant prostitutes in the mainstream media. Might I be so bold as to ask you to consider this simple idea the next time one of the hall of fame worthy ass kissing grovellers of CNBC come on to lick the boots of a guest you should sew your pockets up before venturing near. Maybe then people will begin to appreciate CNBC for what it truly is; a bought and paid for, wholly owned, Wall St. propaganda subsidiary. Actually maybe I should stop swimming against the current, pop a Prozac with a Xanax chaser and get with the program like so many other yes men and women huh? Yeah, that's the ticket. Get with the program.'

More: prudent-speculation.blogspot.com 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: axial3/12/2012 10:20:14 AM
   of 2341
 
Financial Repression Has Come Back to Stay: Carmen M. Reinhart

'As they have before in the aftermath of financial crises or wars, governments and central banks are increasingly resorting to a form of “taxation” that helps liquidate the huge overhang of public and private debt and eases the burden of servicing that debt. Such policies, known as financial repression, usually involve a strong connection between the government, the central bank and the financial sector. In the U.S., as in Europe, at present, this means consistent negative real interest rates (yielding less than the rate of inflation) that are equivalent to a tax on bondholders and, more generally, savers.

In the past, other measures also included directed lending to the government by captive domestic entities (such as pension funds or banks), explicit or implicit caps on interest rates, regulation of cross-border capital movements, and (generally) a tighter coordination between governments and banks, either explicitly through public ownership of some institutions or through heavy “moral suasion” by officials.

Central banks in both developed and developing countries are being subjected to complementary pressures. Emerging markets may increasingly look to financial regulatory measures to keep international capital “out” (especially given the expansive monetary policy stance pursued by the U.S. and Europe). Meanwhile, advanced economies have incentives to keep capital “in” and create a domestic captive audience to absorb the financing for the high existing levels of public debt.



[...]

Complicating the situation is the fact that the debt overhang isn’t limited to the public sector, as it was immediately after World War II. There is now a high degree of leverage in the private sector, especially in the financial industry and households. In addition, the recent buildup in external leverage was greater than in past crises. This debt overhang and the financial fragility it creates are a common feature of most advanced economies, along with stubbornly high unemployment. Concerns that higher real interest rates and deflation will worsen an already precarious situation will probably impose added constraints on monetary policy.

-- Negative Real Interest Rates, 1945-1980 and Post-2008: One of the main goals of financial repression is to keep nominal interest rates lower than would otherwise prevail. This effect, other things being equal, reduces governments’ interest expenses for a given stock of debt and contributes to deficit reduction. However, when financial repression produces negative real interest rates and reduces or liquidates existing debts, it is a transfer from creditors (savers) to borrowers and, in some cases, governments.

This amounts to a tax that has interesting political- economy properties. Unlike income, consumption or sales taxes, the “repression” tax rate is determined by factors such as financial regulations and inflation performance, which are opaque -- if not invisible -- to the highly politicized realm of fiscal policy. Given that deficit reduction usually involves highly unpopular spending cuts and/or tax increases, the “stealthier” financial-repression tax may be a more politically palatable alternative.

[...]

Faced with a private and public domestic debt overhang of historic proportions, policy makers will be preoccupied with debt reduction, debt management, and, in general, efforts to keep debt-servicing costs manageable.

In this setting, financial repression in its many guises(with its dual aims of keeping interest rates low and creating or maintaining captive domestic audiences) will probably find renewed favor and will likely be with us for a long time.'

More: bloomberg.com 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: axial3/14/2012 6:14:14 AM
1 Recommendation   of 2341
 
Why I Am Leaving Goldman Sachs

'TODAY is my last day at Goldman Sachs. After almost 12 years at the firm — first as a summer intern while at Stanford, then in New York for 10 years, and now in London — I believe I have worked here long enough to understand the trajectory of its culture, its people and its identity. And I can honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it.

[...]

How did we get here? The firm changed the way it thought about leadership. Leadership used to be about ideas, setting an example and doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position of influence.

What are three quick ways to become a leader?

a) Execute on the firm’s “axes,” which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit.
b) “Hunt Elephants.” In English: get your clients — some of whom are sophisticated, and some of whom aren’t — to trade whatever will bring the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like selling my clients a product that is wrong for them.
c) Find yourself sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque product with a three-letter acronym.


[...]

It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as “muppets,” sometimes over internal e-mail. Even after the S.E.C., Fabulous Fab, Abacus, God’s work, Carl Levin, Vampire Squids? No humility? I mean, come on. Integrity? It is eroding. I don’t know of any illegal behavior, but will people push the envelope and pitch lucrative and complicated products to clients even if they are not the simplest investments or the ones most directly aligned with the client’s goals? Absolutely. Every day, in fact.

It astounds me how little senior management gets a basic truth: If clients don’t trust you they will eventually stop doing business with you. It doesn’t matter how smart you are.

These days, the most common question I get from junior analysts about derivatives is, “How much money did we make off the client?” It bothers me every time I hear it, because it is a clear reflection of what they are observing from their leaders about the way they should behave. Now project 10 years into the future: You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the junior analyst sitting quietly in the corner of the room hearing about “muppets,” “ripping eyeballs out” and “getting paid” doesn’t exactly turn into a model citizen. '

nytimes.com 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: axial3/16/2012 6:56:37 AM
   of 2341
 
Italy Said to Pay Morgan Stanley $3.4 Billion

[From Alabama to Greece, Ireland to Italy," muppets" everywhere ...Morgan Stanley, GS, what's the difference?]

'When Morgan Stanley (MS) said in January it had cut its “net exposure” to Italy by $3.4 billion, it didn’t tell investors that the nation paid that entire amount to the bank to exit a bet on interest rates. Italy, the second-most indebted nation in the European Union, paid the money to unwind derivative contracts from the 1990s that had backfired, said a person with direct knowledge of the Treasury’s payment. It was cheaper for Italy to cancel the transactions rather than to renew, said the person, who declined to be identified because the terms were private.

The cost, equal to half the amount to be raised by Italy’s sales tax increase this year, underscores the risk derivatives countries use to reduce borrowing costs and guard against swings in interest rates and currencies can sour and generate losses for taxpayers. Italy, with record debt of $2.5 trillion, has lost more than $31 billion on its derivatives at current market values, according to data compiled by the Bloomberg Brief Risk newsletter from regulatory filings.

“These losses demonstrate the speculative nature of these deals and the supremacy of finance over government,” said Italian senator Elio Lannutti, chairman of the consumer group Adusbef.'

bloomberg.com 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: axial3/21/2012 5:59:52 PM
2 Recommendations   of 2341
 
Goldman loses bid to end lawsuit over risky CDO

'Goldman Sachs Group Inc lost its bid to dismiss a lawsuit accusing it of defrauding investors by selling risky debt linked to subprime mortgages that it planned to bet against. The decision by U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero in New York keeps alive a hedge fund's claims over a $2 billion offering of collateralized debt obligations, amid intense scrutiny over Goldman's activities before and after the 2008 financial crisis.

[...]

It accused Goldman of creating the Hudson Mezzanine Funding 2006-1 and 2006-2 CDOs, which were backed by residential mortgage-backed securities, in late 2006 as part of a secret scheme to offload subprime risk.

The hedge fund said it lost nearly all of its $4 million investment, selling its holdings for 2.5 cents on the dollar in October 2007 after having paid 95 cents or 100 cents on the dollar the previous winter. Marrero dismissed one claim by Dedona that accused Goldman of market manipulation.

But the judge said even "large sophisticated" investors such as Dodona might not have understood Goldman's CDOs, and that the bank's boilerplate disclosures on their "speculative" nature might be inadequate. Goldman "created the synthetic CDOs here in dispute, a form of investment instrument that, Rube Goldberg-like, few but a select group of its own designers, engineers and lawyers could clearly explain, let alone understand, precisely how it functions or exactly what it does," the judge wrote.'

reuters.com 

---

[When are sovereign governments - not hedge funds - going to sue?]

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: axial3/22/2012 3:42:10 AM
   of 2341
 
Basel‘s Monstrous Regulatory Mistake

[Leverage -- see how Basel and banks did it: youtube.com  ]

---

'The Basel Committee made a monstrous regulatory mistake in Basel II, when they considered the credit ratings of the clients of the banks when setting the capital requirements for banks, even though the information provided by the credit ratings was already being considered by the market and the banks when setting their risk-premiums and interest rates.

Even if the credit ratings had been perfect it would have been wrong as something considered excessively, can be much worse than something not considered at all. But, of course, being the credit ratings the product of human fallible raters, so much the worse to leverage the importance of their failings.

That stupid and unforgivable mistake resulted in:

1. The setting of minimalistic capital requirements that served as growth hormones for the ‘too-big-to-fail’.

2. That banks overcrowded and drowned themselves in shallow waters, whether of triple-A rated securities backed with lousily awarded mortgages to the subprime sector, or of equally or slightly less well rated “rich” sovereigns, like Greece.

3. A serious shrinkage of all bank lending to small businesses and entrepreneurs as lending to these generated, in relative terms, much higher capital requirement, which made it difficult for them to deliver a competitive return on bank equity.

With Basel III, regulators, instead of correcting the mistake, are trying to correct for this mistake, which can only result in a serious case of overmedication and in the Basel Committee digging us deeper in the complex hole where they placed us. bit.ly 

voxeu.org 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: axial who wrote (2095)3/28/2012 10:24:57 AM
From: Worswick   of 2341
 
Axial fantastic posts .... keep it up.

A few things of note here , first GS derivative profits this quarter.

Lauren Tara LaCapra Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:37am EDT

(Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc's (GS.N) first-quarter earnings are expected to benefit from the increased use of derivatives by European clients seeking ways to hedge risk, according to an internal report seen by Reuters.

Revenue at Goldman's investment bank in Europe increased by 8 percent from the year-ago period to $476 million, the report said.

A big driver was derivatives that clients, corporations and financial institutions used to hedge bets in the stock and fixed-income markets.

Overall client-driven derivatives revenue was up 142 percent year-to-date in Goldman's Europe division, helping to offset declines in more traditional investment banking businesses, like mergers and acquisitions.

The figures suggest that steps taken by European regulators to stabilize capital markets have been effective and have set the stage for stronger-than-expected quarterly results for Wall Street investment banks.

The figures also suggest that U.S. banks are benefiting from stress among European competitors that have had to step back from the market and reduce risk-taking in the midst of the sovereign debt crisis.

On a conference call last week to discuss quarterly results, Jefferies Group Inc (JEF.N) Chief Executive Richard Handler said "a number of larger foreign players who have had ambitions of being global are choosing to go back to their respective countries to basically satisfy their regulators and the rating agencies." That is a situation, he said, that "creates an opportunity" for U.S. competitors to gain market share.

Goldman's derivatives gains were driven by clients adjusting their balance sheets for counterparty credit risks, as well as European financial institutions seeking capital gains, said a source familiar with the results who spoke on condition of anonymity because the figures are not public.

Goldman spokesman Michael DuVally declined to comment on the figures.

Goldman does not break out its European results individually in quarterly reports. Instead, it reports revenue for Europe, Middle East and Asia, which delivered $2.87 billion of revenue and $1.09 billion in pre-tax earnings for the first quarter of 2011.

Analysts have been lifting their estimates for Goldman in recent weeks thanks largely to improved market conditions.

Analysts expect Goldman to earn $3.25 per share for the first quarter, on average, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S, up from an estimate of $2.89 per share 30 days ago. The figure compares with adjusted earnings of $4.38 a year ago, excluding a one-time cost of redeeming preferred stock.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Worswick3/28/2012 10:31:52 AM
   of 2341
 
Secondly, continued from my last post "of intersting things upon the horizon" .... please reference article number two in this section.


I have been looking for years to find a brief staement about "what will happen".


See: Mark Grant Explains The Latest European Con Tyler Durden on 03/28/2012 09


As The ECB Crosses The Inflationary Rubicon Has Mario Draghi Lost All Control? Tyler Durden on 03/28/2012 For the charts inv this article see:

zerohedge.com 


Having been heralded around the world for solving Europe's crisis, ECB head Mario Draghi confidently states (as does every other central banker in the world) that "should the inflation outlook worsen, we would immediately take preventive steps". However, a recent analysis by Tornell and Westermann at VOX suggests the ECB has hit its limit with regard to its anti-inflationary fighting measures.

The ECB appears to have lost control over standard measures of tightening: short-term interest rates (since short-term lending to banks has dropped to practically zero), increase in minimum reserve requirements (practically impossible withouit crushing the banks that they have propped up due to the sharp asymmetries - the recent cut from 2% to 1% minimum reserves saw a remarkable EUR104bn drop), and finally asset sales (the quantity of 'sensitive' or encumbered assets on the ECB's books has reached such a scale - due to LTRO, SMP, and ELA programs - leaving the 'sellable' non-sensitive assets at a level below excess deposits for the first time in ECB history).

Got that? (posters blog note, bold type mine)

As the authors note, while this does not immediately produce an inflation flare, the lack of maneuvering space will induce an inflationary bias to ECB monetary policy as Draghi will find it increasingly expensive at the margin to hit the anti-inflationary brakes. "This bias puts the Eurozone at risk of de-anchoring long-run inflationary expectations. The danger is not inflation today, but the de-anchoring of expectations about future inflation." As we have noted many times before, the ECB (and for that matter most central banks in the world) need Goldilocks.

Standard monetary 'instruments' to control inflationary concerns (or the ECB's ability to absorb an excessive increase in liquidity) have hit a limit:

Short-term interest rates will be ineffective since ECB lending to MFIs is now minimal:Increasing the minimum reserve requirement will crush banks capital - especially damaging for low-excess deposit countries where systemic bank runs would likely occur.

And finally asset sales is very limited since the unencumbered (or non-sensitive) ECB assets - that are practically saleable - have crossed below the excess deposits level for the first time - standing at just 26% of the balance sheet (simply out the ECB would not have enough non-sensitive assets to sell in order to cover a withdrawal of excess deposits by banks).

In summary, the intersections in Figures 1 and 3 make clear that the ECB has lost its ability to implement standard anti-inflationary policies.




Mark Grant Explains The Latest European Con Tyler Durden on 03/28/2012 09 From Mark Grant, author of Out of the Box and Onto Wall Street The Firewall- An Irrelevancy

“Tough luck, Lonnehan. But that's what you get for playing with your head up your ass!”

-The Sting

There is noise and fluff and soap bubbles floating in the wind but don’t be distracted. Like so many things connected to the European Union it is just hype. In the first place do you think that any nation in Europe is actually going to put up money for the firewall no matter what size that they claim it will be? Let me give you the answer; it is “NO.” The firewall is just one more contingent liability that is not counted for any country’s financials, one more public statement of guarantee that everyone on the Continent hopes and prays will never be taken too seriously and certainly never used. Any rational person knows that some promise to pay in the future will not solve anything and it certainly won’t create some kind of magic ring fence around any nation. Think it through; what will it do to stop Spain or Italy from knocking at the door of the Continental Bank if they get in trouble and the answer is clearly nothing, not one thing. The firewall is just a distraction to lull all of you back to sleep and all of the headlines and discussion about it makes zero difference to any outcome and so is nothing more than a ruse. “Look this way please, do not look that way, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, put up your money to buy our sovereign debt like a good boy and everything will be just fine.”

“Did you ever hear of a hustle called Two Brothers and a Stranger?”

-The Color of Money

The more that the 170 politicians in the 17 countries discuss the size of the firewall, whether Germany will guarantee more money or not, whether the old fund will be used in conjunction with the new fund; the more the scam is in play.It is a hustle organized by a very elegant set of grifters and since Eurostat clearly states that “promises to pay” are not counted on any nation’s financials then why would you think that “promises to pay” have any value in fencing out economic contagion? Spain or Italy will hit the skids based upon solvency issues and whether the interest rate on their debt is 7.00% or 5.50% makes very little difference in determining the outcome. The core issue for these countries is whether they can pay their debts and as their recession worsens and as the payments come due the squeeze is on. The LTRO money is beginning to run dry and unless they do another one and take the debt at the ECB up to $6 Trillion or the EU starts handing out money like candy upon the street corner the debts cannot be paid.The Ponzi bonds may well roll on and the Ponzi scheme may well get bigger but just because the Bernie Madoffs on the Continent tell you that your money is safe; Mark Grant will tell you that it is not.

One Degree of Separation between “Being Right” and “Winning”

We play the Great Game to win. We do not play the Great Game to be right. Get this clearly in your minds because it makes ALL the difference. Here is the embarkation point and the disembarkation point between money managers. Here is the line, the Great Divide, between coming out on top and falling by the wayside. Winning is the thing, it is the only thing and “getting it right” may lead you to be a winner but it is not what is really important; winning is what is important. Consequently when “The Con” is on there are only two realistic choices; do not play or trade around it. For longer term investors you must recognize that the sting is underway and invest your money in other places. For the hedge fund types you can bet against or trade with the momentum but while doing so never, ever forget that “The Con” is in motion.

“Someday, following the example of the United States of America, there will be a United States of Europe.”

-President George Washington

Now here is a great example of what I am trying to explain. This comment from the first President of the United States has turned out to be basically correct. However, if you had betted on it then it would have been some two hundred and change years before you won your bet. Generations would have come and gone and so, being right, is not always the way to play the Great Game. Further, “being right” is always defined by the timeline on which the proposition depends and so Father Time, your best friend and worst enemy, forever intervenes in the outcome of any investment. An LTRO, a Quantitative Easing, the printing of money, always drives up the prices of assets in the short term; this would be as in ALWAYS.Then when the well runs dry again the opium induced swindle is played again and sometimes again and again but then, inevitably, there comes a time, a moment, when for political or economic reasons the presses are shut down and there is no longer any new money. Here, at this specific point, the road switches back, the reversal begins, and the Pied Piper demands payment for the use of the printing presses.

You do not need to go back two hundred years to the wisdom of the Founding Fathers to see what is currently happening. Try just four years ago, 2008, and the presses were rolling, the mortgages were bundled, the ratings agencies gave them a AAA based upon diversification, no documentation was needed for loans and the hustle was in full play. In Europe, in 2012, the presses are rolling, the quality of collateral is now the second lien on Mr. Popandopolous’s gyro Greek diner and the hustle is in play. In America the presses are rolling, Chairman Bernanke is engaging in “twists” and turns and now we find that our own Federal Reserve Bank, according to Bloomberg, has even bought a “small quantity” of European sovereign bonds. Our Fed is even nicer than the ECB; no demands for collateral at all so that not only does the rabbit pop out of the hat but the hat pops out of pure air. Alchemy is alive and well. The Philosopher’s Stone has been found and it is resident at the world’s central banks.

The Game Book

Now yields in the longer end of the curve are beginning to back up. This is your first indication of trouble to come. Then it will be even higher yields, the equity markets will begin to back up, assets will decline in price and your portfolios will be chock full of flung mud. Given the particularities of this crisis, with TIPS at negative yields and the yields on short term bonds just off of Kelvin’s Absolute Zero; the risks are magnified. It is out of bullets and into corporate bonds tied to Inflation, and fixed-to float bonds and anything and everything to adhere to Grant’s Rules 1-10; “Preservation of Capital.” I don’t care if you do not like structured bonds or if you keep intoning the mantra of liquidity because normal old fixed coupon bonds in the space of five years and out are going to have marks to market that will cause a gagging sensation and so the Great Game must be played from a different angle. When the time comes that the LTRO play is over and when the Fed shuts off the spigot then the Hell that will be paid will be lining up at everyone’s doors demanding cash and not accepting anymore IOU’s. Bow to Hamelin and thank the gods of the marketplace that your eye was good enough to see the Pied Piper making the turn and heading down the road.

''The music stopped, and I stood still,
And found myself outside the Hill,
Left alone against my will,
To go now limping as before”


-Robert Browning, The Pied Piper of Hamelin

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.