SI
SI

 Strategies & Market Trends | LastShadow's Position Trading


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: LastShadow who wrote (40470)2/11/2001 11:23:23 PM
From: ken-l   of 43080
 
lastshadow,

oops .. sorry .. was my fault <GGG> !! just copy/paste it from another board where i posted regularly; and forgot to cut off the blah blah portion of the post !! if u know how to remove the message, please dont hesitate to do so !!

sorry for the inconvenience & thanx in advance !!

regards,

auto

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: ken-l who wrote (40469)2/12/2001 12:20:01 AM
From: ken-l   of 43080
 
my apology to the board re: message #40469

please disregard the message; it was my mistake !!

sorry for the clumsiness !!

regards,

ken

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ken-l who wrote (40472)2/12/2001 7:58:36 AM
From: AlienTech   of 43080
 
Knew there was trouble brewing

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: LastShadow who started this subject2/12/2001 9:44:40 AM
From: U Up U Down   of 43080
 
A Bum Deal for Lucent Shareholders

By Dave Marino-Nachison (TMF Braden)
February 12, 2001

You might think embattled
telecommunications equipment maker
Lucent (NYSE: LU) would jump behind any
investment firm's support these days, but
that's not the case. Instead, the company is
recommending that investors stay away
from New World Liquidity Fund's offer to buy
up to 300,000 shares of the company at $10.75 per share.

That's good advice. Why? For one thing, shares of Lucent closed
Friday at $15.46 per share, a substantial 44% premium to New World's
reported offer.
fool.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: U Up U Down who wrote (40474)2/12/2001 11:22:49 AM
From: AlienTech   of 43080
 
Who woudnt want a 50% gain? You would think a lot of people would be buying the shares at 15-16 just to sell it to new morons at 10. Now I seen everything. There should be more of this kinda deals, just to see how many stupid people are there in the world. Cant blame new morons though, They think they have the IQ coeficint cornered.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: U Up U Down who wrote (40474)2/12/2001 12:53:23 PM
From: American Spirit   of 43080
 
LU snagged the monster deal from VZ. Why isn't anyone talking about it? The stock is down in the abyss meanwhile on SEC news we knew about six months ago. Go figure.http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/010212/nj_lucent_.html

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: AlienTech who wrote (40475)2/12/2001 3:06:48 PM
From: John J H Kim   of 43080
 
ITRU-makin nice move...found this rummaging thru yhoo-ITRU message board:

Napster In Talks To Use InterTrust's Code
By Todd Spangler, Interactive Week
February 9, 2001 3:40 PM ET

Napster, the music-sharing service reviled by much of the music industry, is in discussions with InterTrust Technologies concerning the use of InterTrust's content-protection technology in the forthcoming version of its service.

David Ludvigson, president and chief operating officer of InterTrust, said his company is in talks with Napster and Bertelsmann - which is working with Napster to develop a "legitimate," subscription-based version of the service - about using the InterTrust technology.

InterTrust, based in Santa Clara, Calif., is one of the top suppliers of digital rights management - or DRM - tools to content producers and others. InterTrust's DRM technology allows content owners to place restrictions on how music, movies or other digital assets are distributed or played.

InterTrust already has a partnership in place with Bertelsmann, the German media company. Last year, Bertelsmann formed its own digital rights management company, Digital World Services, which uses InterTrust's digital rights management technology to provide "clearinghouse" functions for the distribution of digital content.

"We're not formally doing anything [with Napster], but we're talking to DWS, Bertelsmann and Napster about using our technology," Ludvigson said in an interview.

A Napster representative did not return phone calls requesting comment on which other DRM vendors Napster may be considering.

Last October, Bertelsmann made the stunning announcement that it would loan Napster $50 million to develop a copyright-friendly version of the service.

The media company also said it would drop its lawsuit against Napster if it successfully launched such a service that would compensate the music companies.

Since then, Napster has not disclosed how or when it plans to implement the secure version of the service, although it has floated a potential monthly subscription fee of $4.95. Napster executives have said that the company expects to maintain a free version - dubbed "Napster Classic" by some analysts - regardless of the nature of the fee-based counterpart.

Besides its arrangement with Bertelsmann, InterTrust also has licensing agreements with other companies, including America Online, Universal Music Group, Adobe Systems, and Nokia - which last week also invested $20 million in InterTrust.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: American Spirit who wrote (40476)2/12/2001 3:13:41 PM
From: Jeff Jordan   of 43080
 
everyone wants to see them beat a quarter....buy now....

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jeff Jordan who wrote (40478)2/12/2001 4:35:03 PM
From: LastShadow   of 43080
 
The Big Board continues to outperform the Nasdaq when it comes to placing stocks on the 52-week high list. The ratio has been about 2-to-1 over the past several weeks. Today there are 134 NYSE-traded stocks making new highs, while the Nasdaq contributes 73 tickers. New high notables include speciality retailer Hot Topic (HOTT 28 11/16 +1 7/8), financial services software developer SunGard Data (SDS 56.5 +1.51) and fashion designer Polo Ralph Lauren (RL 28.2 +1.22).

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: LastShadow who wrote (40479)2/12/2001 9:03:08 PM
From: LastShadow   of 43080
 
Good article...

fool.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.