SI
SI

 Coffee Shop | COMPUTER LEARNING


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Larry S. who wrote (60167)11/12/2008 9:15:53 AM
From: thecow   of 82314
 
I do not remember where I read it but I did read yesterday that the bigger the hard drive, the better. Had to do with seek speeds or something along those lines, not just the extra space.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Larry S. who wrote (60167)11/12/2008 10:36:12 AM
From: TimF   of 82314
 

Generally if the extra space doesn't cost much, I'd go for it. Its easier to get a big drive in the first place rather than having to go back and upgrade later. And its good to have some free space in addition to what you typically use.

About the only disadvantage I can think of is that you might keep more stuff you don't need. Then you might have more junk to look through to find things and your defrags would take longer.

But that's not really a disadvantage of the larger drive directly, its not like you can't organize your drive well, and toss out unneeded junk just because you still have plenty of space.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Larry S. who wrote (60167)11/12/2008 11:04:10 AM
From: Greg or e   of 82314
 
When we bought our first computer my wife asked me: "why are we getting such an incredibly large hard drive" adding: "We will never ever use all that space". That hard drive was 25 megabytes, not gigs, megs! In the early eighties a 10MB hard drive was considered "too large for personal computing".

Moral of the story: Get the biggest hard drive you can. However, upgrading is easy to do and may be cheaper to do yourself with only basic knowledge. Don't pay a huge premium to get a larger hard drive. Often for what they charge, you could buy a new hard drive on-line for less than the upgrade and add it to your computer yourself, either keeping the original for even extra space, or selling it. Same with memory but if your computer has 4 gigs of memory, that should be enough.

Hope that helps
Greg

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Larry S. who wrote (60167)11/12/2008 11:38:09 AM
From: thecow1 Recommendation   of 82314
 
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong but it just occurred to me that one of the reasons for going as big as you can afford makes the density of the disk greater thus reducing seek time for the drive head leading to faster operations and less wear and tear on the mechanical device. Bigger is better!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: appro11/12/2008 11:58:32 AM
1 Recommendation   of 82314
 
AVG update deleted Windows XP file according to these links.

Anandtech:

>>>>>>>>>>
This weekend users' found their AVG software updated with a new virus definition file. Then they quickly found their computers crashing.

What was discovered was that the new virus definition file mistook user32.dll, a critical Windows component, for a container for the Trojan Horses PSW.Banker4.APSA or Generic9TBN. When the scanner went active, it deleted this critical file, thinking it contained a virus, causing the system to crash. AVG recommended users whose definitions auto-updated delete their virus definition file and cancel any scans they have running.
<<<<<<<<<<<
dailytech.com 
<<<<<<<<<<<<

Blorge:
vista.blorge.com 



Be careful out there.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: appro who wrote (60172)11/12/2008 2:34:09 PM
From: Doug Coughlan   of 82314
 
Let's hope this last sentence from your link has corrected the problem:

"Both AVG 7.5 and AVG 8.0 were affected by the erroneous definition file. The file has since been update to remove the error."

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: thecow who wrote (60168)11/12/2008 8:02:19 PM
From: LTBH1 Recommendation   of 82314
 
Assuming both drives have the same RPMs but the higher capacity drive is using a denser technology, then could be a marginal speed gain .... course the inner tracks (which are the slower tracks to access for read/writes) on the larger capacity would also probably be marginally slower.

All things being equal, relatively smaller faster drives in a raid setup would probably be the choice for a real PC speed freak, although with any current design SATA HD not sure why the typical PC user would need to be concerned about such.

Few years ago the choice for such an array would be SCSI drives but quite possible current SATA equals or exceeds SCSI speeds without the associated costs .... wasn't that many years ago I paid lower 5 figures for a 300+MB SCSI drive.

Luck
LTBH

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: LTBH who wrote (60174)11/12/2008 8:12:23 PM
From: thecow   of 82314
 
5 figures for a 300+MB SCSI drive.

That hurts! Thanks for the info. I have never had raid but from what I have read it is definitely the way to go for real speed freaks. I want a fast computer but not to the extent of setting up raid and oc'ing everything. Every time I have tried any of that stuff I ended up reinstalling everything. I have enough heat problems where my computer is located and I don't want to go with water cooling. Oh, and I don't want my computer sounding like an airplane getting ready to go airborne. I like it nice and quiet.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: thecow who wrote (60175)11/12/2008 8:29:15 PM
From: LTBH   of 82314
 
With todays cheap drives, I recommend that everyone uses at least 2 HDs of same manufacturer, size and model in a RAID 1 array for a quick easy precaution against single HD failure.

This is a mirrored array in which the primary disk is "mirrored" on the second drive .... this is NOT a backup solution per se.

Motherboard must support as most current ones do, as well as have RAID chip/controller, again as most do. Having same everything for both HDs is most efficient but not required however the array will only mirror equal to the smaller size of two unequal Gigs.

Below is quick C&P of the different types of arrays .. if speed gain and not mirroring is desired the RAID 0 is what ya want.

Arrays with 3 similar HDs can be setup for hot swapping assuming HD can technically accomodate.

-------------

There are various combinations of these approaches giving different trade-offs of protection against data loss, capacity, and speed. RAID levels 0, 1, and 5 are the most commonly found, and cover most requirements.

* RAID 0 (striped disks) distributes data across several disks in a way that gives improved speed and full capacity, but all data on all disks will be lost if any one disk fails.

* RAID 1 (mirrored disks) could be described as a backup solution, using two (possibly more) disks that each store the same data so that data is not lost as long as one disk survives. Total capacity of the array is just the capacity of a single disk. The failure of one drive, in the event of a hardware or software malfunction, does not increase the chance of a failure nor decrease the reliability of the remaining drives (second, third, etc).

* RAID 5 (striped disks with parity) combines three or more disks in a way that protects data against loss of any one disk; the storage capacity of the array is reduced by one disk.

* RAID 6 (less common) can recover from the loss of two disks.

* RAID 10 (or 1+0) uses both striping and mirroring.

---------------

Luck
LTBH

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: FUBHO11/13/2008 11:38:17 AM
3 Recommendations   of 82314
 
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - 10:55 AM PST | Modified: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - 10:55 AM
Huge spam business shut down in San Jose

Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal

A San Jose business reported to be responsible for more than 75 percent of the world’s spam email has been cut off from the Internet and its web site shut down.

According to a report by the Washington Post, McColo Corp. was a Web hosting business with customers made up of “some of the most disreputable cyber-criminal gangs in business today.”

The company’s Web site, mccolo.com, was not working on Wednesday.

The Post reported in a blog that Global Crossing in Bermuda and Hurricane Electric Internet Services in Fremont, two of McColo’s main Internet providers, pulled the plug after getting reports from Security Fix about its activities.

Security Fix said it studied the company for four months before making the report.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.