Microcap & Penny Stocks | AGIS-Formerly ATCT


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: rlev who wrote (377)10/9/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: Northern Marlin   of 722
 
Rich,

Let's work our way down from the top line and see where we end up. We've got over a month til AGIS reports results, so there's plenty of time to analyze the situation.

First, let's try to figure out revenues for 3Q99:

In the last two conference calls I've tried to get management to forecast their results. You may remember my questions for CEO Steve McNeely regarding revenue during the mid-May call. I referred to Steve Murphy's research report during that call (That report estimated revenues for 3Q99 at $75 million.). Mr. McNeely agreed that the estimate was no longer within the realm of possibility, but when I asked if there was still a chance of getting into the 70's he replied that they have "a reasonable shot at it".

After the mid-August conference call I contacted the company with respect to revenues and margins again. I was informed that using a revenue estimate of $70 million for 3Q99 was too high. So, I revised down to $65 million, but then it seemed near impossible for AGIS to hit the 3-4% EBIT range that CFO Matt Waller forecast during the last conference call. I contacted the company again, and was informed that $65 million is still too high.

So, there you have it. Revenues for 3Q99 will be less than $65 million. I propose that for our further discussions we look at something in the range of $57.5M to $62.5M.

Any comments from the thread before we move on to gross margins?

Phil

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Northern Marlin who wrote (378)10/9/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: Steven Jay   of 722
 
Phil,

Have you spoken to AEGIS since the September 20th press release?

That press release cited in part:

1. improvements in capacity utilization;

2. recently signed new business;

3. SG&A reductions.

Additionally, the release mentioned improvements in financial results beginning in the 3rd quarter.

I just thought this might help in your calculations.

Best regards,

Steven Jay




Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Steven Jay who wrote (379)10/10/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Northern Marlin   of 722
 
Steven,

I've received two e-mail replies from AGIS' IR contact since the 9/20/99 press release about the de-listing. Below is an excerpt from the e-mail I sent in reply to one I received from Aegis on 9/23/99:

Based on your comments in your last e-mail I've revised my models with new revenue estimates for 3Q99 ($65M) and 4Q99 (72.5M). With a gross margin of 31.5% for 3Q99 I don't expect EBIT margins to be much above 1%. This would fall short of CFO Matt Waller's range of 3-4% mentioned in the previous conference call.

Was there some major change between the conference call on 8/16/99 and your e-mail to me on 9/23/99? Maybe I'm using some incorrect numbers:

Rev $65M
Cost of Sales $44.5M
Gross Profit $20.5M
SG&A $16M
Depreciation $3M
Amortization $0.6M
EBITDA $4.5M
EBIT $0.9M

Please make comments where you are able. If you would be more comfortable talking over the phone, just give me couple of time frames that you know you'll be in your office.


The response I received on 10/7/99 was very short. The key sentence tells the whole story: "As for your questions - the topline is still overly-optimistic." The writer went on to apologize for his brevity, saying that he was swamped with the "proxy statement, Questor due diligence, budget process, forecasting process...".

Steven, it's true that AGIS has lowered their SG&A costs from $17.1M for 3Q98 to $16.25M for 2Q99. I'm using $16M in my model for 3Q99. Do you think it will be less than that?

Regarding capacity utilization, my comment is that it appears to be a subject where a clear definition of terms is necessary. I tape all of the conference calls, and during the mid-May conference call CEO McNeely clearly stated that AGIS had a goal for the 2nd half of 1999 of better than 90% capacity utilization. Then, during the mid-August call he said that they were going to fall short of their goal of 80% capacity utilization. I questioned him about it during the call. The response was less than satisfactory.

As to the signing of new business, that sounds wonderful. But the track record of management doesn't inspire confidence. Every conference call has included discussion of the robust pipeline of new business. I haven't sold any of my position, but I'm not looking forward to the mid-November announcement of results. I think there's going to be more pain ahead for shareholders. I hope I'm wrong (I'll gladly eat crow right on this thread).

Meanwhile, do you have any comments on my revenue estimates for 3Q99?

Phil


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Northern Marlin who wrote (380)10/10/1999 9:50:00 AM
From: Steven Jay   of 722
 
Phil,

I have no information on the revenue numbers or SG&A costs. I might ask, are you including in your forecast the conversion of $13 million in subordinated debt that occurred in the third quarter of 99?

It certainly is difficult for me to understand why there is no revenue growth when clearly the rest of the industry seems to be moving in the right direction. There is an answer which we have yet to discover. It could be the sales force.

Respecting your comments concerning more pain for the shareholders, this is where I might disagree, simply because of the Questor investment of $46 million.

We believe this investment is going forward. Right now the market cap for the company is $26 million. A cash infusion of this magnitude is bound to have a positive impact on the stock price.

Questor made be influencing AEGIS right now more than we know. Perhaps this explains the stagnant revenue growth. Changes in management may be on the drawing board and present individual senior management may be floating resumes. This type of transition environment is usually not a good time for growth.

If Questor is coming in with $46 million and AEGIS hasn't lost revenue and progress on lower expenses is on track, we may be
at the bottom now.

I do not believe that Questor would make this type of investment in a company that doesn't have a foundation for growth.

Best regards,

Steven Jay

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Steven Jay who wrote (381)10/10/1999 12:19:00 PM
From: Northern Marlin   of 722
 
As always, Steven, you raise interesting points. Let me respond to them in order, with your remarks in italics.

I might ask, are you including in your forecast the conversion of $13 million in subordinated debt that occurred in the third quarter of 99?

I'm only trying to forecast EBITDA and EBIT, so interest expense isn't included. The company will not have net income in 3Q99. I'm not even sure if they'll have positive EBIT.

It certainly is difficult for me to understand why there is no revenue growth when clearly the rest of the industry seems to be moving in the right direction. There is an answer which we have yet to discover. It could be the sales force.

Overall revenue is down because of slippage with 3 large accounts: AT&T, US West, and First USA. Comparing 2Q99 with 2Q98 pro forma, revenues for those three accounts are down $14.5M. Also, E&L was down $2.0M in 2Q99 versus 2Q98.

There are two other areas of growth for this industry that AGIS hasn't addressed yet, and I wonder if they will. The first is using the internet as another aspect of customer relationship management. Among the public teleservices companies APAC, ICTG, PRRC, TLSP, and TTEC have all announced product offerings that allow their agents to converse with clients' customers while those customers are online. I put the question to CEO McNeely during the mid-May conference call. He said they have the technology, their customers know Aegis' capabilities, they just haven't chosen to make an announcement to that effect. The other area is in the deregulation of electric power utilities. I've already seen one company announce a contract with a utility. I wonder if AGIS will get any of that business.

Respecting your comments concerning more pain for the shareholders, this is where I might disagree, simply because of the Questor investment of $46 million.

The reason I expect more pain for us, the shareholders, is that the results for 3Q99 will compare so poorly with 3Q98. Revenues will be down, perhaps as much as 20%, and all margins will be lower. I hope the story line of press release will be: Yeah, we had another losing quarter, but our margins were better than 2Q99, and we still expect a profit in 4Q99.

Right now the market cap for the company is $26 million. A cash infusion of this magnitude is bound to have a positive impact on the stock price.

I hope you're right. I really want to believe it.

Questor made be influencing AEGIS right now more than we know. Perhaps this explains the stagnant revenue growth. Changes in management may be on the drawing board and present individual senior management may be floating resumes. This type of transition environment is usually not a good time for growth.

I agree that changes in management may be coming. But I disagree that Questor's influence may be the reason for stagnant revenue growth. Merrill Lynch only arrived on the scene to pitch this Questor idea to AGIS in mid-summer. The revenue growth problems have been around much longer than that. And for over a year they've been attempting to consolidate after the merger, while migrating out of the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

If Questor is coming in with $46 million and AEGIS hasn't lost revenue and progress on lower expenses is on track, we may be
at the bottom now.

I do not believe that Questor would make this type of investment in a company that doesn't have a foundation for growth.


These are excellent points, and I want to believe them. And that is precisely why I continue to hold my considerably large position.

I wish you would post more often, because it forces me to think harder about my analysis of this company and the sector as a whole.

Phil

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Northern Marlin who wrote (382)10/10/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: Steven Jay   of 722
 
Phil,

Thanks for the kind words in your last response.

I do believe if 3Q 99 performance is compared to 2Q 99 rather than 3Q 98 AEGIS will be O.K., as long as the bleeding from account reductions from AT&T, US West and First USA has abated. Maybe we'll even see some revenue improvement from Wingspan and AT&T customer service.

I agree I'm reaching when I discuss Questor's impact on new revenue. It just doesn't make sense that revenue isn't growing. The technology issue, as you stated, also concerns me. The company should clearly state its capacity for e-commerce.

All things considered, AEGIS is still owned by individuals with resources and has funding alternatives which its competition may not have available. Additionally, as previously stated, the Questor investment will have a major impact and will hopefully dominate the the 3Q earnings release. Maybe, AEGIS will give a hint as to how the money will be used.

All that said, perhaps its time for a little history. Between five and eight years ago when AEGIS was NRP, the stock price fluctuated from pennies to a little over two dollars a share. Through the first half of 1995 it kept on sinking until it reached eighteen cents a share. From that low point, over the next eighteen months, it changed its name to ATC and achieved a stock price of 26. ATC underwent this rapid advance along with the competition. Remember, APAC sold at 60. TTEC at 40.

Most of the subsequent decline in teleservice stocks was caused by AT&T pulling the plug on outbound telemarketing. Something like a billion dollars disappeared from the industry.

It appears all the publicly traded teleservice companies have survived and are now building revenue relying on much more stable and profitable inbound service. Unfortunately, AEGIS, which was battered more than most is still lagging.

We may be at the start of a considerable rebound in this sector with the growth of customer service work and e-commerce. Will AEGIS participate? Unless something is fundamentally wrong with the company that we don't know about, it should.

So regarding today's low stock price; been there, done that.

Best regards,

Steven Jay

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Steven Jay who wrote (383)10/10/1999 5:15:00 PM
From: Jim Miller   of 722
 
Phil and Steven,
A good exchange, from the graveyard. From another wanderer in the night of AGIS's blackout, it's worth a few more words on the AT&T thing. T has undergone great fluctuation in stock price, major management changes and a serial failure of major strategic initiatives. It is the largest short position on the NYSE, and until T's fortunes improve, the teleservices industry will not settle into a predictable new pattern. Yup, AGIS seems to have done poorly at surviving the drought that T's serial brain farts have exacerbated, but T shows signs of revival, and may well be our bellwether in this slough of despond. If you believe this, and feel it worthwhile to hold AGIS (as I reluctantly do) then T should be a good place to park some dough. Then again, I may be kidding myself--suffering my own mental indigestion due to a severe overdose of AGIS in my portfolio.
Keep them coming.
Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Steven Jay who wrote (383)10/11/1999 8:55:00 AM
From: Northern Marlin   of 722
 
Steven,

Let's talk about what sort of impact the Questor money might have, because I look at it more as a life-saving event than a major boost.

Why would I say that? Well, look at 2Q99 results: Gross profit was $14.9M, SG&A expense was $16.2M, interest expense was $1.8M, and they spent $4.0M on CapEx. That's a $7.1M cash deficit (Frankly, it'll be very hard for AGIS not to show an improvement for 3Q99 over 2Q99!). This company has been a cash user for a long time, and Questor is their ticket for survival.

My guess is that 3Q99 will be another quarter with a cash deficit. And, based on management's track record of coming up short on every projection since 3Q98, I'll believe a profit for 4Q99 when I see it.

So, I expect a large portion of the Questor money to go for keeping the company operating. Maybe the balance will be used for reduction of debt or growth. I'm hopeful for growth, just not very confident.

And let's not rule out the possibility of a reverse stock split. I believe the company will have over 85 million shares outstanding when the Questor deal is done. Currently they're only able to issue 100 million shares. A reverse split would allow them to re-list on the NMS without any appreciation in the stock price.

In summary, I agree with you that the teleservices sector has rebounded. There are plenty of growth opportunities. Can Aegis participate in this growth? I sure hope so, that's where my money is. But after so many disappointments and negative surprises I have to tell you that my confidence is not where it once was.

Phil

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Northern Marlin who wrote (385)10/11/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: Steven Jay   of 722
 
Hi Phil,

I don't think a reverse split is in the cards right now for a number of reasons.

1. A reverse split would be a temporary fix without profits because no matter how you divide a loss its still a loss and the stock could fall right back to current levels.

2. I believe the current owners and Questor believe the company will be profitable and that the stock value will appreciate based on profits. I don't think any of them would be willing to give up shares.

3. A reverse split might have forestalled delisting. If they didn't use it then, I don't think they will use it now.

I think the Questor money will reduce debt and foster growth, hopefully in e-commerce. However, you and I agree, there is no substitute for new business and that remains the critical question.

I'll say this. What about taking the company private now and going public at a future date. Isn't the float around nineteen million. How much would it cost to buy the outstanding shares? After all, considering the limited ownership, AEGIS resembles a private company now.

Is Questor saving the company or investing for the future?

I don't believe Thayer resources have been exhausted. AEGIS to my knowledge has never been close to defaulting on debt. If Questor didn't invest, Thayer would have financed needed capital or they would have sold the marketing division.

I don't have new knowledge about Thayer's other investments. If Thayer is in trouble, then I agree, Questor is a save.

Best regards,

Steven Jay


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Northern Marlin who wrote (378)10/12/1999 9:11:00 AM
From: rlev   of 722
 
Hi Phil:

Sorry I couldn't get back to you sooner I was biking (the human powered kind) up in NH/VT.

Steven is right. Questor would not invest in AGIS if it didn't think their fundamentals were intact ... BUT I also don't like to assume that someone else did the home work. I like to understand whats happening my self.

I'm going to try (time permitting) to go over AGIS's numbers next weekend. I think we need to come up with several models reflecting the possible range of revenue/costs. From this exercise we can narrow down our guesses of what the next few Q's might bring.

Rich

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.