Technology StocksWi-LAN Inc. (T.WIN)

Previous 10 Next 10 
From: 2Gorgeous1/26/2012 6:29:58 PM
   of 16843
IDCC getting into WhiteSpace

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Dexter Lives On2/9/2012 8:37:39 AM
   of 16843
Time for the patent purchase pursuit to resume, Cheers. Z4

U.S. Likely to Approve Google Bid for Motorola

By Jeff Bliss - Feb 9, 2012 12:01 AM ET

The U.S. Justice Department will probably give antitrust approval next week to Google Inc. (GOOG)’s bid for Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc (MMI)., said two people familiar with the matter.

If approved by regulators, the acquisition of Libertyville, Illinois-based Motorola Mobility will give Google more than 17,000 patents for mobile-phone technology.

The Justice Department also will probably approve a plan by a consortium led by Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Apple Inc. (AAPL) to buy Nortel Network Corp. patents, the people said. The Nortel acquisition will give the Apple-Microsoft consortium, which also includes Research in Motion Ltd., Sony Corp., Ericsson AB and EMC Corp (EMC)., control of more than 6,000 patents and applications that cover wireless technologies.

In its investigation of the deals, the Justice Department became concerned with the increasing tendency of patent holders suing to stop other companies from using their essential smartphone technology, one of the people said. The department will continue to examine companies such as Google that haven’t sworn off the practice, the person said.

Both people didn’t want to be identified because they weren’t authorized to speak about the investigations publicly.

Google’s $12.5 billion planned acquisition of Motorola Mobility and the Apple-Microsoft group’s $4.5 billion purchase of patents from bankrupt Nortel are part of a growing trend of technology companies buying patents to defend themselves against intellectual-property suits.

Gina Talamona, a Justice Department spokeswoman, declined to comment on the department’s plans.

Google spokesman Adam Kovacevich and and spokeswoman Mistique Cano didn’t immediately respond to e-mails and phone calls seeking comment on the possible approval.

Google Letter

Also yesterday, Google said in a letter to technology standards groups that it would still consider seeking court injunctions to block companies from using its technology if it couldn’t resolve “standard compliant” patent disputes. Google wrote the letter to answer questions from the European Commission, which is reviewing the Motorola Mobility deal to determine if it would hurt competition.

European regulators will rule on the acquisition by Feb. 13, Antoine Colombani, a spokesman for the commission in Brussels, said Feb. 7. The agency could clear the deal or open an in-depth probe that would last about 90 working days.

“Transparency and consistency in licensing practices are important with respect to standard essential patents,” Deputy General Counsel Allen Lo said in a letter to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute. “I am confident that Google’s acquisition of MMI will not disturb those goals or otherwise adversely affect” manufacturers or consumers.

Continued at

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Dexter Lives On2/28/2012 9:18:57 AM
   of 16843
Yahoo ready to sue Facebook on patent claims

Dan Levine
San Francisco— Reuters
Published Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012 8:55AM EST
Last updated Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2012 9:02AM EST

Yahoo ( YHOO-Q14.86-0.03-0.20%) has demanded licensing fees from Facebook for use of its technology, the companies said on Monday, potentially engulfing social media in the patent battles and lawsuits raging across much of the tech sector.

Yahoo has asserted claims on patents that include the technical mechanisms in the Facebook’s ads, privacy controls, news feed and messaging service, according to a source briefed on the matter.

Representatives from the two companies met on Monday and the talks involved 10 to 20 of Yahoo’s patents, said the source, who was not aware of what specific dollar demands Yahoo may have made for licenses.

Yahoo did not elaborate in an e-mailed statement on details of its discussions with Facebook, but indicated it would not flinch at taking the social networking giant to court over its patents.

Yahoo said other companies have already licensed some of the technologies at issue, and that it would act unilaterally if Facebook refused to pay for a patent license.

“Yahoo has a responsibility to its shareholders, employees and other stakeholders to protect its intellectual property,” the company said.

The meeting between the two companies was first reported by the New York Times.

A Facebook spokesman said: “Yahoo contacted us at the same time they called the New York Times and so we haven’t had the opportunity to fully evaluate their claims.”

Should Yahoo wind up suing Facebook, it would mark the first major legal battle among technology giants in the social media sphere and a major escalation of patent litigation that has already swept up the smartphone and tablet sectors and led by Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Motorola Mobility.

Yahoo’s patent claims follow Facebook’s announcement of plans for an initial public offering that could value the company at about $100-billion.

Several social networking companies, including Facebook, have seen an uptick in patent claims asserted against them as they move through the IPO process.

However, most of those lawsuits have been filed by patent aggregators that buy up intellectual property to squeeze value from it via licensing deals, and none by a large tech company such as Yahoo.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Dexter Lives On4/3/2012 12:56:52 PM
   of 16843
Another patent troll operating out of Florida. ;-)

RIM Accused of Infringing Patents on BlackBerry Chips
By Susan Decker - Apr 3, 2012 12:33 PM ET

BlackBerry maker Research In Motion Ltd. (RIMM) was accused of infringing six patents owned by NXP Semiconductor NV (NXPI) for technology including ways to expand the range of data transmission.

NXP, Europe’s third-largest chipmaker, filed the complaint yesterday in U.S. federal court in Orlando, Florida. The Dutch chipmaker, based in Eindhoven, Netherlands, seeks cash compensation and a court order to block further use of its inventions.

RIM products including the BlackBerry Torch, Playbook, Curve and Bold are using the patented inventions without permission, NXP contends. The other patents cover computer bus systems, mobile phones with GPS receivers, circuit manufacturing, the polishing of the surface of wafers, and patterning of layers on the wafer.

Marisa Conway, a spokeswoman for Waterloo, Ontario-based RIM, said the company doesn’t comment on pending litigation.

RIM fell $1.16, or 8.1 percent, to $13.21 as of 12:31 p.m. in New York trading, the biggest decline in more than two months, as investors speculated that potential acquirers are losing interest.

The case is NXP BV v. Research in Motion Ltd. (RIM), 12cv498, U.S. District Court for the District in Orlando (Florida).

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: Dexter Lives On4/9/2012 7:52:53 AM
   of 16843
AOL to Sell, License Patents to Microsoft for $1.06 Billion

By Ville Heiskanen - Apr 9, 2012 7:28 AM ET

AOL Inc. (AOL), under shareholder pressure to make strategic changes as revenue declines, agreed to sell and license patents to Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) in a deal worth $1.06 billion.

The Internet company will sell more than 800 patents and related patent applications to Microsoft and grant the software maker a non-exclusive license to its retained patent portfolio, the companies said today in a statement. AOL will hold more than 300 patents and patent applications after the deal.

The transaction lets New York-based AOL generate additional funds amid slow advertising growth and a decline in its dial-up Internet subscribers. The company, whose revenue has dropped 29 percent since its 2009 spinoff from Time Warner Inc., has faced pressure from shareholder Starboard Value LP to consider moves including a patent deal.

AOL said it plans to return a “significant portion” of the sale proceeds to shareholders. Had the patent deal closed already last year, AOL said it would have had about $15 per share of cash on hand as of Dec. 31, 2011.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: emrs14/10/2012 5:49:35 PM
   of 16843
All Claims of WiLAN's V-Chip Patent Upheld by US Patent Office
Ticker Symbol: C:WIN U:WILN


Wi-LAN Inc. ("WiLAN" or the "Company") (TSX:WIN)(NASDAQ:WILN) today announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") has confirmed the validity of all the claims in WiLAN's US Patent No. 5,828,402 (the "402 Patent") along with more than 30 new claims. The USPTO ruling signals that the 402 Patent re-examination proceedings are at an end. ...

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: emrs1 who wrote (16080)4/10/2012 6:11:53 PM
From: Mark Bartlett
   of 16843
Finally someting positive for WIN.

- M

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (16081)4/10/2012 8:03:01 PM
From: emrs1
   of 16843
I wonder if this is related to the relative strength in the stock over the past couple of days. I'd like to think not.

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)

To: emrs1 who wrote (16082)4/10/2012 8:37:06 PM
From: Mark Bartlett
   of 16843
Me too, but I think we are dreaming.

- M

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read

From: P2V4/15/2012 10:26:11 PM
   of 16843
Sorting Out, and Correcting the NY Court's Mess:

The upgraded 402 Patent carefully defines a series of sub-steps of Claim 7 , of
the patent.

1. Receive a Packet (a serial data envelope) containing data within a Region
Rating Table (RRT)portion, and a Master Guide Table.(MGT)

a. Store this Packet in a Buffer (random access memory )

Of interest to some may be the fact that there are NO actual V-chip circuits (or circuit boards within the typical Digital TV devices.

Equipment makers ,have instead chosen to perform these functions within the standard (off the shelf) "Closed Capion Circuitry", which is required of all digital TV devices .

Also much of the supposed "Workaround" gobbledygook , is discredited by the fact that

these Close Caption Devices perform (1 & 1a ) with absolutely NO knowledge (or awareness) of the Preloaded, and Fixed, Region Rating Table.

Therefore, much of the Court's "With Prior Knowledge" rhetoric , is essentially fiction, IMHO.

************************************************************************2. Analyze both the MGT data and the RRT data for the following results--

a. result 1 = an obsolete RRT (eg RRT1) has been received = discard it

b. result 2= an entirely new RRT has been received = store it in a
semi-permanent specific memory location... thereby known as the Current RRT.

c. result 3 = an Ugrade (revision) to the Current RRT has been received =
store it in that same, semi-permanent specific memory location
... known as the Current

d. result 4 = an RRT, that is precisely equal to the Current RRT has been received = discard that received data.


The confused NY Court officials ... INSISTED that
2b. (result 2) .... would be... the ONLY valid completion result.... of Claim 7 .

They are entirely wrong .... and based upon this ignorant conclusion ... they ruled
against Wi-Lan.

Rather ALL results (1,2,3,or 4 ) signify a COMPLETION of Claim 7.. each and every time this broadcasted data is received.

I fully expect that they will learn the error of their ways , when Wi-lan WINS
their Appeal

Share RecommendKeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2018 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.