SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Technology Stocks | Wi-LAN Inc. (T.WIN)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: P2V6/23/2011 9:12:11 AM
   of 16299
 

WiLan should look closely and very quickly at this !

This IMHO, would be a splendid place to put into place, their WhiteSpace Technology.

This is a new LTE (huge)Network that is dangerously close to GPS services.

You might want to be aware that an increasing number of Instrument landing approaches..

ie Hundreds of smiling passengers ...... gliding down to a runway in rain and fog) could be relying on
sexy new GPS based Instrument Landing Systems ..

insidegnss.com 
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) report on the level of interference
between LightSquared's proposed mobile broadband network and GPS receivers is
due in a couple of weeks. Meanwhile, the fight over final approval of the system
has rolled into the halls of Congress.
On Thursday (May 26) the House approved an amended 2012 Defense Authorization
bill requiring the Federal Communications Commission to withhold full approval
of the LightSquared 4G-LTE system and disallow operations until interference
issues with military receivers are resolved.The FCC granted LightSquared a
waiver on January 26, allowing the firm to repurpose frequency licenses used to
supplement its satellite-based service for use in a ground-based network. The
frequencies are adjacent to those used by GPS, and final approval of the system
was conditioned on working out interference and power overload issues with the
GPS community.
The new provision, set forth in Section 911 of the authorization bill, is much
stronger than the original measure, which only required the Defense Department
to report interference problems to Congress and submit a plan for addressing
them.
"Our military is heavily reliant on an uninterrupted GPS capability to do their
jobs," said the amendment's sponsor Rep. Michael Turner (R-Ohio). "The risk to
our forces of the widespread denial of GPS was too great and required action."
The new version also mandates the FCC to make the final report on
LightSquared/GPS testing available to Congress and permit all interested parties
to comment — a requirement that could slow the fast-tracked LightSquared
project. Finally, in a move that may head off future jurisdictional squabbles,
the FCC's decision documents will now go to the two committees in both the House
and Senate tasked with overseeing the Defense Department and the FCC. The Senate
has yet to take up its version of the bill.
Though the measure was substantially stronger than its initial, the real bite
was in the House Report that accompanied the bill. Such reports are meant to
give congressional perspective on the action items within legislation and, in
this case, the message was decidedly frosty.
Underscoring that the FCC did not conduct an interference study before granting
LightSquared a waiver, the committee said it was "disappointed that the FCC
proceeded … prior to any study and resolution of the GPS interference issue."
Moreover, it called on the FCC to "indefinitely postpone final decision until
the harmful interference issue has been resolved, with the full …approval of the
Department of Defense."
The report writers also pointedly reminded the Secretary of Defense that "the
Secretary may not agree to any restriction on the Global Positioning System . .
. that would adversely affect the military potential of the Global Positioning
System."
The defense-focused amendment passed the House less than a week after a third of
the nation's senators signed a letter to the FCC expressing concern "that
LightSquared's proposal places an unacceptable risk to public safety through
interference with GPS receivers necessary for aviation, first responders,
agriculture, construction, maritime navigation, E-911, and national defense
systems."
The bipartisan group of 33 senators, led by Sens. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Ben
Nelson, D-Neb., asked the FCC to rescind the waiver until LightSquared could
"demonstrate non-interference of GPS."
"We fully appreciate the interest of some members of Congress in the FCC's
review of LightSquared's proposal to provide 4G-LTE service in the L-Band," said
Jeffrey J. Carlisle, LightSquared's vice president for regulatory affairs and
public policy. "GPS is a vital service to the United States, and LightSquared is
committed to identifying and resolving any interference issues."
The firm, which took out large color ads in the Washington Post and the Wall
Street Journal underscoring their proposal's advantages, may be facing another
round of congressional ire. A new letter asserting that the FCC "recklessly
fast-tracked the waiver process" is making the rounds in the House of
Representatives. Working to gather support for the letter are Reps. Randy
Neugebauer, R-Texas, Steve Austria, R-Ohio, Collin Peterson, D-Minn., and Ralph
Hall, R-Texas.
The FCC, the four say, should "only grant final approval to LightSquared if the
company can indisputably demonstrate that their proposal will not interfere with
GPS technology.
Dee Ann Divis is assistant managing editor – news at the Washington (D.C.)
Examiner and the Washington View columnist for Inside GNSS magazine.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: P2V6/25/2011 2:22:21 PM
   of 16299
 
Strange name for a True Billion Buck, Bidder
(Rockstar Bidco, LP ) :


ftc.gov 

ftc.gov 

EEarly Termination Notices under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Any person filing an HSR form may request that the waiting period be terminated before the statutory period expires. Such a request for "early termination" will be granted only after compliance with the rules and if both the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice Antitrust Division have completed their review and determined not to take any enforcement action during the waiting period. In some instances, after a Request for Additional Information and Documentary Material has been issued, the investigating agency will determine that no further action is necessary and terminate the waiting period before full compliance with the Second Request is made. Because the FTC administers the HSR Program, all early terminations, regardless of which agency reviews a transaction, are listed here.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Zed4 who wrote (15932)7/4/2011 10:09:29 AM
From: Mark Bartlett   of 16299
 
Great action on Wi Lan today ... I have a feeling there will be more announcement in the next few months. This could turn into a real powerhouse.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: iwebsplash7/7/2011 7:00:30 PM
   of 16299
 
Who Stands For Canada

The NORTEL intellectual property will be on the auction block come Monday morning June 27, 2011. Through a game of high-stakes brinkmanship the coveted portfolio will be and awarded to one of the giants of the tech industry. The Nortel IP, funded in large part by Canadian taxpayers, has been described as a "national treasure" by Mike Lazaridis – CEO of Canada's Research in Motion. Kasim Alfalahi, chief intellectual property officer at Ericsson, said "The Nortel patent portfolio reflects the heritage of more than 100 years of its R&D activities and includes some essential patents in telecommunications and other industries in a statement” A source at INTEL, who has confirmed the corporation is actively seeking to acquire the IP, has referred to the portfolio as a virtual "gold mine". The common term bandied about in the media is "nuclear weapon"... translation being that the successful buyer will wield formidable power within the global Technology industry.

The scope and relevance of the IP is simply breathtaking and stands alone as a monument to Canadian research and ingenuity. We are clearly way beyond Avro Aero stuff folks… archives.cbc.ca  this is intellectual property at its most brilliant and lies at the very core and future of the global telecommunications industry. This arsenal of 6,000 patents covers nearly every aspect of telecommunications, internet search, and social networking. Key among them are the "crown jewels" of LTE and 4G patents which industry analysts are touting as the future communications backbone of mobile technology. This industry segment alone is forecasted to experience staggering growth over the next five years. Google, who holds the "stalking horse" bid of $900 Million, refers to the IP as a "formidable patent portfolio" that will assuredly form a key component of their strategic planning.

seobythesea.com 

The Harper government has taken a laissez-faire approach in essentially allowing the industry to decide. "Harper doesn't believe the government should interfere, as long as the foreign takeover abides by the Canadian Investment Act and represents a net benefit to the country. "

cbj.ca 

So let's then examine the key aspects of the Federal Act that is held up as the legal hurtle to all significant foreign investments and acquisitions. The Act basically stipulates that in determining whether an investment is of "net benefit", the Minister will consider the following factors:

1. the effect on the level of economic activity in Canada, on employment; on resource processing; on the utilization of parts and services produced in Canada and on exports from Canada;

2. the degree and significance of participation by Canadians in the Canadian business or new Canadian business and in any industry or industries in Canada;

3. the effect of the investment on productivity, industrial efficiency, technological development, product innovation and product variety in Canada;

4. the effect of the investment on competition within any industry in Canada; the compatibility of the investment with national industrial, economic and cultural policies; and

5. the contribution of the investment to Canada's ability to compete in world markets.

ic.gc.ca 

Based on the Government's position then, the translation would be that retaining the Nortel IP in Canada would be the wrong decision and NOT in the best interests of Canadians. That the intellectual brilliance of LTE and 4G which will become the driving force of mobile technology and forecasted for staggering growth over the next decade, is NOT a "net benefit" to Canadians? I'd love to see former Industry Minister Clement – now promoted Finance Minster - stand up and make that case to Canadians! Especially in light of his comments to justify the federal governments blockage of the Potash sale where he stated empathically that the federal government must do the right thing when faced with difficult decisions. "I believe that my decision today is the right decision in the interests of Canada and in the interests of Canadians and that is my bottom line."

theglobeandmail.com 

One would be hard pressed indeed to argue that the IP sale does not violate in fact every single one of the above legal factors. It is of such concern that it promoted then Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff to claim that Prime Minister Harper and Industry Minister Clement would be "wilfully turning their backs on their own law and the future of Canada's technology sector". Quite clearly he perceived that it did not pass the sniff test and make it over the legal hurdle.

network.nationalpost.com 

Even the US Government is showing more of an interest and concern regarding the impact of the Nortel acquisition. " Realizing the potential for abuse that might result from the sale of Nortel's vast trove of patents, the DOJ is taking an active position in trying to balance antitrust and intellectual property law matters in an attempt to ensure that any company acquiring patents in bankruptcy proceedings do not then unfairly inhibit competition." jetlaw.org  The Harper government strategy becomes even more puzzling when one factors in a more international perspective in relation to government investment and protection of intellectual property within the technology arena.

The Chinese government recently stated that China "aspires to have a group of core patents for newly emerging industries and key technology in traditional industries within the next ten years."

news.xinhuanet.com 

President Obama just announced a $500M investment into research within the US Robotic industry. "We have watched countries in Europe and Asia invest heavily in robotics," said Dean Elkins Chairman of RIA." There's no doubt that robotics is one of the most important technologies of the 21st century and the National Robotics Initiative will play an important role in advancing robotics developments," Elkins added.

robotics.org 

With regard to Obama's very substantial investments into green energy technology; the U.S. is spending six times more per capita on green energy R&D than Canada and reports are Canada has already lost 66,000 green energy jobs to the U.S. alone.

mariaminna.liberal.ca 

thestar.com 

the-common-sense-conservative.blogspot.com 

Can you image the Chinese or American governments adopting the Harper Government position if they were threatened with losing the very heart of their intellectual property? The public and media outrage would be at such an astounding decibel level that politicians would have it shot dead in the starting blocks! It would never see the light of day. While governments around the world are actively engaged in revamping and protecting their nation's intellectual property in addition to pouring funding into research, ours is on the sidelines doing the funky chicken. It just really is that much of a joke folks!

So what are the consequences to Canada's high technology industry in losing the Nortel IP? Are we going to see a ripple effect in the aftermath? Whoever acquires the Nortel patent arsenal will probably put the other tech giants at a strategic dis-advantage. This could very well trigger a feeding frenzy in their attempts to balance the intellectual property scale and strengthen their patent hand. In the high stakes game of intellectual property poker bigger apparently means better. The short term impact could very well be the acquisition of additional Canadian IP entities.

What then is the impact on Research in Motion? Are we witnessing the slow burn of a once glittering star? Is RIM the next Canadian Nortel? Many analysts are projecting their continued slide and eventual acquisition by one of the tech giants - probably simply to purchase market share. What a shame indeed!

kitguru.net 

Could RIM's future into mobile technology have been re-kindled with the acquisition of the Nortel IP? The answer is most assuredly. Industry analysts have long been reporting that RIM's weakness was its lack of patent punch. Innovation within the mobile device arena is critical today where the competition is coming out with significant upgrades at a dizzying pace. canadaeast.com 

The long term consequences of the Harper Government's apparent fiddle while Rome burns policy; could very well result in the almost total erosion of Canada's intellectual property with respect to high technology. The end result being that Canadians would finally be put back in their rightful place as hewers of wood and drawers of water!

In conclusion, the answer to the questioned posed in the title of "Who Stands for Canada?" is clearly established by the evidence which indicates that in this particular case, at this particular time, it most assuredly is not the Harper Government. History could very well, and should judge them harshly… judgement day may in fact be not that far down the road…

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: iwebsplash who wrote (15936)7/8/2011 9:00:55 AM
From: Zed4   of 16299
 
Political discussions are not welcome here.

The Nortel patent sale is done and the only relevance to WiLAN is in potential Gladios consignment deals or derivative patent acquisitions by WiLAN.

Please keep the discussion on topic.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Zed4 who wrote (15937)7/8/2011 9:32:08 PM
From: Mark Bartlett   of 16299
 
Brian Acker was on BNN tonight (July 8) and has a 14 dollar "model" price (he is a quant) for WIN -- but thinks 10.40 is where she will go next as FMV.

My own 6-9 month target is 12-13, but that is based on my TA only.

Cheers,

Mark

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Mark Bartlett who wrote (15938)7/8/2011 11:12:38 PM
From: Zed4   of 16299
 
Thanks for the update. Good to know the current model/analysis predictions.

I'll mention my target in a couple of years, when hopefully it will seem more reasonable....! ;-)

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Zed4 who wrote (15939)7/9/2011 6:50:15 AM
From: Mark Bartlett   of 16299
 
Zed,

I have one of those targets too ... but I am just going to keep it to myself as well.

Cheers,

- M

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: P2V7/24/2011 10:58:10 PM
   of 16299
 
A strong LTE portfolio ... mostly through aquisitions.

Here is the original post from Agora Com .... preceeded by my comments... and
Refer to the 18 slides in J.S.'s Presentation.
link:
http://www.webcastregister.com/brileyco2011/briley-2011-annual-investor-conference-wi-lan-inc-tsxwin-p-137.html


He presents Gladios an an Acacia-Like company, whose revenues will be "lumpy" (one time payments). Therefore not a replacement for the
continuing 5-6 year term payments by licensees to the primary company.
Consider Gladios to be a good "add-on" with limited downside risk & capital investment. (and where the Patent Owner, serves as an advisor to Gladios)
 REF LTE:
Click on Slide 11, and discover that Wi-Lan has been preparing, obtaining LTE Patents for several years.
It is not only well positioned for LTE, it has also created new LTE technology specific to pico and femo cells. (Slide 15)
Skippen states, that Wi-Lan has "essential patents" in .. WiFi, Bluetooth, HDTV (High Definition TV) ,
3G (3rd Generation Mobile Communications) , and also... A strong LTE portfolio ... mostly through aquisitions.

To view & listen to the presentation.
Click on the link below, then create a user I.D. and password.
link: http://www.webcastregister.com/brileyco2011/briley-2011-annual-investor-conference-wi-lan-inc-tsxwin-p-137.html

Once in the presentation , you may scroll horizontally through the slides. Select a slide, and you will then hear Jim's description of that subject.
*******************************************************
Overview of Jim Skippen's presentation at Investment Conf 5/25 in Santa Monica ( B Riley Company)

Agoracom Post:
http://agoracom.com/ir/wilan/forums/discussion/topics/485899-overview-of-jim-skippen-s-presentation-at-investment-conf-5-25-in-santa-monica/messages/1558015
posted on May 28, 11 10:22AM ( Log in to use the IP Check tool) [?]
Overall a very good presentation. Professional. Depicts Wilan as a stable growth company with high margins.

Mostly news or info that we are aware of, but a few new nuggets:

1. Cash on hand now at $197 million
2. Corporate policy has been to have dividends at 30% of pre-tax profit; however this open to shareholder input
3. LTE is well covered
4. He consistently positioned Wilan against Acacia

The LTE comment was particularily important because it was almost a lead item in the presentation. JS used the LTE example of how Wilan must anticipate technology trends 5 to 8 years before broadscale adoption. This is the case with LTE and Wilan made a big and correct bet on LTE. Two takes from this: first, JS beleives that Wilan is well positioned to generate revenue from the uptake of LTE; and second, infers that there is little motivation to enhance that position through any Nortel patents.

The message from the Gladios portion of the presentation was a mixed message. First JS downplayed its importance; yet on the other hand he stated that revenues from the Gladios initiative could be significant. Perhaps he was speaking from a strategic perspective becasue he said that Wilan's base revenue is from licensing of Wilan-owned patents and that Gladios revenue should be considered as add-on. He contrasted the Wilan strategy to Acacia whose revenues prredominently come from partnerships with one-time payment for use of the IP. In that light his longer term goal looks like it is to generate Acacia type revenues from Gladios with the overlay of a predictable fixed payment and running royalty licensing revenue. Wilan need to make some significant announcements the the Gladios space to establish credibility; presently it is but a plan.

On the NASDAQ listing, I thought that he let slip that it would be next week but quickly added or "soon" or some words to make the date less a known. I may listen to the replay later to comfirm exactly what I heard.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: Zed47/29/2011 10:06:01 AM
   of 16299
 
IEEE 802.22 - Whitespaces / Letters of Assurance (of Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discrimnatory Licensing)
ieee802.org 
ieee802.org 

Breaking with the past practices, WiLAN doesn't appear willing to play the FRAND game any more where large companies pretend to accept technology introductions on presumption of good faith licensing negotiations, and then refuse to license them once introduced, even though backed by solid legitimate patents. These large companies have gone further and launched massive PR campaigns against inventors, trying to discredit any legitimate attempts to collect royalties.

Under this new regime, no FRAND in effect means licensees will pay market rates at time of licensing, for whitespace/lte/... technologies.

While the Wifi settlements were an interesting gambit, it's now time for infringers to really pay - WiLAN has proven that they can and will enforce, and the licensing rates will rise accordingly for new markets and renewals, without the shackles of FRAND to restrain the rates and terms of licensing deals....

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.