Microcap & Penny Stocks | ISSM


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: SONAR who wrote (4595)5/28/1997 11:56:00 AM
From: taxgun   of 5211
 
another "gpg" pick down the drain
jp

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: taxgun who wrote (4596)5/28/1997 12:20:00 PM
From: Lee Bush   of 5211
 
Joe:
Unfair! GPG may have brought it to our attention, but we have had a couple of years to assess the company ourselves. I sold all but a small portion for taxes last year and the rest will go this year, it looks like. We must place the blame where it belongs, on MOT. Those guys are responsible, IMO, for the demise of a perfectly sound venture.
Lee

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: taxgun who wrote (4596)5/28/1997 1:03:00 PM
From: Bennett Zimmerman   of 5211
 
I stopped tracking. . . how have the GPG picks done?

Speculation money for sure. . .

People should be aware of one other negative possibility.

Let's assume that ISSM and GAD does have some viable technology.

Let's assume that B.Terry thinks that ISSM as a shell is either
A) tainted or B) too diluted for his liking

Let's assume that B.Terry and friends own another corporation or decide to create one.

Let's assume that second corp buys patents from GAD for nominal rate.

Let's assume they begin the hype again with second company. . .

Where does that leave holders of ISSM stock? Where does that leave Mr. Terry and friends.


There are so many stocks to chose from in the market. Many of which have stunning upside potential. Why would investors want to tie themselves to a shell or group of managers that have either A) consciously misled or B) been unable to meet their own set of expectations.

And sure, there was time when I thought they had something going. But the best thing to do is to sometimes move on. . . there are many opportunities for solid investment. As Jim Collins, an excellent investment advisor has often stated "I hire a stock to do a job. If it doesn't perform, I fire it"

For those who double, triple, and quadruple funds from here, great. But remember there are plenty of solid companies that have demonstrated ability to double, triple and quadruple without any chance of going to zero (Intel, etc)

As for myself, if I see the name B.Terry next to any stock in the future I will run. Not that he has necessarily done anything illegal; simply that I don't think he has performed his job as CEO to my liking. That's it.

It has definitely been fun. The value I have gained in my own portfolio is that I dump stocks that start to develop problems and move to stocks with continued reliability. I will buy beaten up stocks, but only when they start reporting good news again.

Good luck everyone!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Bennett Zimmerman who wrote (4598)5/28/1997 1:08:00 PM
From: Findit   of 5211
 
Bennett, I think you have this one figured out pretty well. Thanks. EOM

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Findit who wrote (4599)5/28/1997 7:21:00 PM
From: Bennett Zimmerman   of 5211
 
Figured out. . .

But figured out too late!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Tech Bull who wrote (4594)5/28/1997 8:12:00 PM
From: Catfish   of 5211
 
Tech Bull,
First, let me say that a joint venture between SGS Thomson and ISSM might have been a good fit providing ISSM had enough resources to fulfill their end of the deal. That means operating capital to produce diodes for SGS Thomson to process, package and market (or consume internally.) However, it is obvious ISSM is broke with few alternatives to raise capital. As a consequence, they have continued to dump shares on the market in spite of the stock price being very weak. (According to Nicole's last Q&A list, they sold 1 million shares to raise $250,000 in early April.) No operating capital means no product will be produced for testing or for sale, and of course, no joint venture with anyone. Situations that will give ISSM revenue but won't require them to use upfront capital to produce anything might work out. But, they still lack an enduser for their product.

Personally, I have lost confidence in the management of ISSM. I doubt that this company could ever succeed with this management team in spite of the promise of the product and the process. I think, the best thing that could happen for the current stockholders is for ISSM to sell the company; all of it, lock, stock and barrell, to a viable producer of GaS products. Obviously, the current team has bungled the job badly.

Btw, I sold half of my shares today for a substantial loss. Still wondering why I need the other half.

Regards,
Darrell

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Lee Bush who wrote (4597)5/28/1997 10:37:00 PM
From: Step1   of 5211
 
Place the blame on MOT? Are you serious?
Would you give IBM congrats for Microsoft `s success or blame Microsoft for Apple`s demise? If a company has some truly impressive tech AND is well managed, they will find a channel for their product. I am not sure we had either in this case but sure hope that something is left standing and worth selling now so at least we can recoup some dollars... I would much rather not be left hoping at this point though... As for blame I have only myself to blame... sadly enough.
later
sg

Does anyone have any idea of what the value of ISSM might be now?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Step1 who wrote (4602)5/28/1997 10:46:00 PM
From: David Bogdanoff   of 5211
 
To all;
Could all of this be more manipulations by the MMs to make us part with our shares cheap? : )

David

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: David Bogdanoff who wrote (4603)5/28/1997 11:45:00 PM
From: Dennis G.   of 5211
 
David, I don't really think there's any manipulations going on. People are
just selling this for 10 cents on the dollar because they assume ISSM is
bankrupt and has no assets. But they haven't yet filed for protection and
I guess that depends on their debts. They should have some physical
assets in that facility in Israel and could raise some cash by selling them.
I think it was a good move to shut it down and should have been done
much earlier. They should have never tried to go into production themselves.
(I say this because I have 20/20 hindsight.)

I don't think they're dead yet but they sure are on life support. But they do
have a patented technology which has produced working GaAs power
diodes and I believe that has value and can be made viable by the right
companies. Without the continuing overhead expenses of the Israeli
facility, ISSM could continue for quite some time as an entity until the
management can either sell or license the technology. I don't think ISSM
management is lying to us when they say there are interested parties
because I don't see what good lying would do them.

For myself, I'm going to hold on to my shares because I don't care about
salvaging what little is left. I'm going to see it through to the bitter end so
I'll at least have the experience and maybe then I won't repeat it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dennis G. who wrote (4604)5/29/1997 8:01:00 AM
From: Cathi Wierzbicki   of 5211
 
Dennis: What patent are you referring to? Unless something has changed recently, GAD doesn't have a patent. One was applied for by RAMOT (the Tel Aviv University commercialization offshoot) back in 1992, I believe. But, when I checked with Allen months ago none had yet been issued. My understanding was that GAD has an exclusive license to use the technology.

Also, I don't believe they could raise cash "by selling...physical assets in that facility" because they are pledged as collateral for the loans from the Israeli government.

Perhaps some value could be derived from selling the corporate "shell" to another company that wanted to come public the easy way...

Personally, I think bankruptcy is inevitable.

Cathi

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.