Technology Stocks | Son of SAN - Storage Networking Technologies


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: D. K. G. who wrote (4522)4/23/2002 11:15:40 PM
From: D. K. G.   of 4808
 
Cisco: Grist for the Mill
byteandswitch.com 


Little by little, Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO - message board) is patching up its storage networking strategy. And while it's publicly downplaying its new relationship with QLogic Corp. (Nasdaq: QLGC - message board), it's a different story behind closed doors, where the two companies are said to be as thick as thieves (see Cisco Turns to QLogic, Cisco and Brocade: This Means War).



Some background details on the Cisco/QLogic connection are worth keeping in mind: Larry Carter, Cisco's CFO, has been on QLogic's board of directors since 1999, and Denis Maynard, VP of worldwide sales at QLogic since September 2001, was formerly director of worldwide field operations at Cisco, having worked there for almost 10 years.

Were Maynard and Carter able to influence Cisco's decision to strengthen ties with QLogic? Undoubtedly. Is this an example of high-level executives forming murky business relationships for personal gain? That's unlikely, analysts say. Both Carter and Maynard declined to be interviewed for this story.

"Carter probably doesn't have a financial incentive," says Harsh Kumar, analyst with Morgan Keegan & Company Inc. "He's independently wealthy and wouldn't risk tarnishing his reputation for this... QLogic won this deal on merit, and because Brocade Communications Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: BRCD - message board) messed up" (see Cisco SAN Plans Get Tangled).

Why might Maynard be particularly interested in improving QLogic's link with Cisco? One industry analyst, who declined to be named, suggests Maynard "might be interested in any buyout Cisco might do to get into the storage area, and ultimately get back to Cisco."

That's an interesting thought, but the likelihood of Cisco acquiring QLogic is slight, given Cisco's rigid position on not buying component suppliers. QLogic's principle business is selling chips and boards.

Still, Cisco could go for just QLogic's switching group (formerly Ancor), a business that has for the most part been an anchor (pun intended) around QLogic's neck. Trying to sell components to companies against which it's also competing -- i.e., switch vendors -- is not an easy task. That's why this unit at QLogic is not growing, analysts say. Talk of QLogic selling or spinning off this unit has been going around for a while.

A source close to QLogic tells Byte and Switch that the company is holding on to the unit in the hope that the market for embedded switches inside storage arrays takes off. If this doesn't happen, it will consider selling the group, the source says. Embedded switches are expected to account for only 2 percent of the total market for storage switches by the end of 2002, although this space is gaining momentum.

"Embedded switch arrays are so much less hassle for customers," says Morgan Keenan's Kumar. "It's $500 cheaper on a per-box basis, as both products share a power supply, cooling, the chassis, and implementation costs... It is a more elegant, integrated solution overall." But, he adds, "it is still a brand-new market and will take time to develop."

That seems to put aside the buzz on Cisco acquiring this unit from QLogic, at least for now. So what else is going on between these two firms? According to Kumar, the chip deal between Cisco and QLogic is also thought to extend to Andiamo Systems Inc., Cisco's in-house storage switch startup (see Cisco Owns Up to Andiamo ).

Kumar believes it was pressure from Cisco that led QLogic to break off its chip deal with Inrange Technologies Corp. (Nasdaq: INRG - message board), possibly because Andiamo may be targeting the same high-end director market as Inrange (see Inrange Nixes 2-Gig QLogic Chip).

Then there is speculation among analysts that Cisco might acquire Gadzoox Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: ZOOX - message board), located just down the road from Cisco in San Jose, Calif., to beef up its Fibre Channel expertise. Market analysts are fairly certain Gadzoox is about to lose its best OEM, Compaq Computer Corp. (NYSE: CPQ - message board), to Brocade (see Compaq to Carry Brocade's 12000). The OEM deal with Compaq was Gadzoox's lifeline, raising the question yet again of how long it can last (see Gadzoox Twitches, Gadzoox Wields Axe).

Cisco maintains it is sticking to its plan of driving revenue from storage networking. But after the embarrassing fiasco with Brocade, it must be hungry to demonstrate some positive results in this market. Cisco has billions in cash to throw around and could well turn to its acquisition team to make something happen (see Cisco Reaffirms SAN Strategy).

— Jo Maitland, Senior Editor, Byte and Switch
byteandswitch.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: D. K. G. who wrote (4546)4/24/2002 2:23:28 PM
From: stockman_scott   of 4808
 
Storage Software Firm Neartek Gets $27 Million

24-APR-02

LAKEVILLE, Mass. - Neartek, Inc., provider of tape virtualization software
and services, has raised $27 million in new financing. Benchmark
Capital, led the round. Earlier investors Doughty Hanson Technology
Ventures and Magnum Telecom also participated in this round.

Neartek
10 Riverside Drive
Lakeville MA 02347
United States
Phone: 508-946-3600
neartek.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: D. K. G. who wrote (4546)4/24/2002 10:34:54 PM
From: D. K. G.   of 4808
 
IP Storage: Coming Attraction

IP networking is so widespread that network operators are eager to use it for storage, too. The technology is familiar to many engineers, so labor costs associated with it are lower than the more specialized Fibre Channel storage networking used by most businesses today. Plus, businesses could simplify a bit by running just one type of network, instead of one for general networking and one for storage.

"People can leverage this mature infrastructure that IP's got out there," says Paul Ross, EMC's director of network storage marketing. "Ethernet's been around a long time, therefore it's a commodity, so it's cost effective. Users wouldn't need all these specialized types of equipment, so they'd get cheaper management costs and equipment costs."

In addition, a single Fibre Channel link supports transmission over no more than 10 km, while IP networks travel much farther. Because of its ubiquity, though, expect Fibre Channel to coexist with IP storage for some years to come.

At the moment, IP storage proponents are at work on three different protocols. The most popular seems to be iSCSI, which also has the catchiest name (pronounced "eye-scuzzy"). Whereas Fibre Channel storage technology runs data encapsulated in the SCSI (small computer system interface) standard over Fibre Channel lines, iSCSI runs SCSI inside TCP/IP, typically over an Ethernet network. Vendors including McData, Adaptec, Agilent and IBM recently tested iSCSI products at the University of New Hampshire Interoperability Laboratory.

But because so many businesses use Fibre Channel and will likely continue to do so for some time to come-if only because the technology gets the job done and is already paid for-storage vendors aim to provide IP storage products that let customers continue to use their Fibre Channel technology. So, the IP storage protocols FCIP (Fibre Channel over IP) and iFCP (Internet Fibre Channel Protocol) support the use of both IP storage and Fibre Channel storage in tandem.

FCIP simply runs Fibre Channel over IP so that, among other things, businesses can connect remote storage area networks over an optical IP MAN or WAN. "FCIP enables real-world solutions for companies seeking to expand their storage network infrastructures over longer distances, while protecting their investments in Fibre Channel SANs and IP-based WANs," says Marc Oswald, chairman of the Storage Networking Industry Association's IP Storage Forum FCIP Group.

Meanwhile, iFCP aims to use IP not just to connect SANs, but to interconnect the various Fibre Channel devices that make up SANs, from host bus adapters to hubs to switches and more.

Because businesses are demanding flexible storage solutions that not only help them move onto IP storage but also capitalize on their investment in Fibre Channel, many of today's storage players are covering their bets by working on multiple products, particularly those based on either the iSCSI or FCIP protocols.

EMC's Ross says the race between IP storage networking and Fibre Channel is a bit like the old videocassette player wars between VHS and Betamax. Ultimately, the better, cheaper, faster product wins. But because both technologies continue to develop, the eventual winner might end up being both. -Ted McKenna

telecommagazine.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: D. K. G. who wrote (4548)4/26/2002 10:40:07 AM
From: Joe Wagner   of 4808
 
U.S. GDP Surged 5.8 Percent in First Quarter
Fri Apr 26, 9:07 AM ET
By Caren Bohan

story.news.yahoo.com 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy raced ahead in the first quarter at the fastest pace in more than two years as consumers spent solidly and a year-long trend of sharp cutbacks in business inventories showed signs of tapering off, the government said on Friday.

Reuters Photo

The latest report from the Commerce Department (news - web sites) showed the economy snapping back sharply from one of the mildest recessions in history but it may not fully resolve lingering concerns about the strength of economic growth going forward.

U.S. gross domestic product, measuring the amount of goods and services produced within U.S. borders, bolted upward at a 5.8 percent annual rate in the first three months of this year -- a full percentage point higher than the forecasts of private economists. The latest growth in GDP (news - web sites) was the strongest since the economy soared 8.3 percent in the final quarter of 1999.

The dollar rose after the GDP number and inflation-sensitive bonds trimmed their gains.

However, economists said the pace of growth should moderate in coming quarters.

"The implication from the larger swing in inventories is that it means it will be harder to get stronger GDP numbers in subsequent quarters. We won't have as much of an additional swing lifting GDP numbers in subsequent quarters," Mark Vitner, senior economist with Wachovia Securities in Charlotte, N.C., said.

The first-quarter gain follows growth of 1.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001 and a contraction of 1.3 percent in the third quarter.

An elite panel of academic economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research has said the U.S. economy entered a recession in March 2001 but the NBER has not yet ruled on when the recession ended. Many private economists have pegged the end of 2001 as a time when the economy appeared to turn the corner to recovery and the latest GDP figures should add fuel to that assumption.

The single-biggest factor bolstering GDP in the first quarter was an abrupt slowdown in the pace at which firms pared back inventories of unsold goods. Firms have slashed their inventories for five straight quarters but in the first quarter they did so at a much slower rate than previously.

Production can go up when companies begin relying less heavily on existing inventories to meet customer demand. Businesses cleared out $36.2 billion worth of inventories in the first three months of this year, a much smaller reduction than the $119.3 billion they wiped out in the fourth quarter.

Consumer spending grew a healthy 3.5 percent. An 8 percent drop in spending on durable goods such as cars was offset by an 8.4 percent surge in purchases of nondurable items like clothes. The gain in nondurable goods was the biggest since an 8.9 jump in the second quarter of 1975.

Corporate spending on new plants and equipment fell but its drop in the first quarter was smaller than those of other recent quarters, which was a positive sign for an economy hit hard by sharp declines in purchases of computers and other business investments.

Business investment on structures, equipment and software fell 5.7 percent in the first three months of this year after it plunged 13.8 percent in the fourth quarter.

The strong first-quarter GDP figure is unlikely to alter expectations that the Federal Reserve (news - web sites) will keep interest rates steady at its next meeting on May 7.

The Fed, which chopped overnight interest rates to a 40-year low last year in a bid to help the recession-hit economy, is widely expected to begin nudging interest rates higher sometime later this year.

But Fed officials have indicated that they want more information on the pace of growth in the current second-quarter before taking action on rates.

--------------------

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Douglas Nordgren who started this subject4/26/2002 4:52:01 PM
From: no name chump   of 4808
 
From Wall Street Journal, April 25, 2002:

Learn to Build a San

sanworkshops.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: no name chump who wrote (4550)4/26/2002 5:26:24 PM
From: stockman_scott   of 4808
 
EMC's Big Bet on a Superstorage System



By Faith Keenan in Boston, with Jim Kerstetter in San Mateo, Calif.
Friday April 26, 8:49 am Eastern Time
BusinessWeek Online


EMC may be badly battered, but it's battling back with a vengeance. Even as it loses money and its stock swoons, the once-mighty data-storage leader could be on the verge of something big. On Apr. 29, it'll introduce a new storage software system called Centera. The few tech analysts who have received confidential briefings on the product describe it as a cheap but smart way for companies to create digital archives for photos, canceled checks, e-mails, or virtually any document. "They have technology that has great potential to be a real breakthrough," says Bill North, director of storage-software research at tech-research firm IDC.

EMC (NYSE:EMC - news) could use some good news. Prices of its high-end storage boxes, the company's bread and butter, plunged 60% in 2001 because of increased competition and tight tech budgets. It finished the year with a 21% drop in revenue, to $7 billion, from $8.9 billion a year earlier. It posted a net loss of $508 million for the period, compared with net income of $1.8 billion in 2000. In late April, it suffered another blow when its stock closed below the psychologically important threshold of $10 -- 90% off its high of $100 in September, 2000.

The product launch could open a big new market for EMC and boost its battered stock. And, if successful, Centera will mark a major step in EMC's make-or-break transition from a big-box hardware vendor to one that sells more of a hardware/software mix. Until now, EMC has typically sold large, expensive digital-file cabinets to Fortune 500 customers like banks and airlines that conduct transactions that are continually updated.

RAIDING THE ARCHIVES. Those systems were often too expensive for smaller players like biotech companies or hospitals. And they didn't fit their needs for more archival, rather than transaction-based, storage. So these sectors often jerry-rigged their own systems, using cheap disks or tape, and hiring software developers to tailor programs for them. But retrieving data from tape is a time-consuming, labor-intensive process.

Centera's edge is that it would tag data in a way to allow customers to index, catalogue, and retrieve it within seconds. To move into the market, EMC hopes to sign up two dozen or more of specialized software programmers to link Centera's smarts to the user's control center. "We think it's a huge market," says Joe Tucci, EMC's CEO and president.

How huge? Tucci wouldn't speculate, but tech analysts are talking billions of dollars. The market for archive data, also called reference information or fixed content, could grow at a 92% compound annual rate for the next three years, far outpacing the more traditional storage market geared toward transactions, forecasts Enterprise Storage Group [ESG], a research firm in Milford, Mass. Increasingly, regulatory agencies like the Securities & Exchange Commission and the Food & Drug Administration are requiring companies to keep more data and for a longer period of time. SOFTWARE WAR. By 2005, reference data will represent 54% of new information, up from 37% of storage capacity today, says ESG. That translates into a potential market of $28 billion by 2006, assuming sales of 2,800 petabytes of storage at a current price of about 1 cent per megabyte. [One petabyte can hold half the contents of all U.S. academic research libraries.]

EMC's new system is a hardware/software combo [heavier on the software] that specially tags files for easy retrieval. Say a cancer patient needs to get a second or third opinion. Instead of the patient having to carry a magnetic resonance image [MRI] around, the doctor would be able to call up the image instantly online. Better yet, instead of saving several copies of an e-mail sent to 20 people, Centera knows to keep only one, saving capacity and reducing management costs. The new product is the outgrowth of FilePool, a Belgian company that EMC bought for about $50 million in cash a year ago.

As storage-hardware margins shrivel, the new battleground is software. And EMC's new-product announcement comes just as the war is heating up. Archrival IBM on Apr. 23 announced its roadmap for developing new software under the Storage Tank trademark. But its planned products -- including software for archival storage -- are still a year away.

"PAPER TIGER"? Mike Zisman, general manager for IBM's storage-software organization, says the products need more testing. "[Centera is] a very immature technology, and it's untested in the marketplace," he says, referring to EMC's offering. "I wouldn't be surprised if this is being rushed because of our announcement" on Apr. 23, Zisman adds. EMC says there's no connection with IBM's announcement, and it adds that beta testers are pleased with its product.

Smaller companies are already moving into segments of the archive market. Isilon Systems, a startup based in Seattle, recently launched a product targeting the streaming-media and medical-imaging markets. Network Appliance (NasdaqNM:NTAP - news) in Sunnyvale, Calif., launched its NearStore software in January. Mark Santora, NetApp's senior vice-president for marketing, says he believes EMC is throwing out a "paper tiger" because it's worried about smaller companies moving in on its turf.

EMC says its product is ready to ship. And analysts say they think it's better than the others available, but that the market will be so big that there's plenty of room for all the current players. Even so, EMC has just endured a tough year, and it'll need a big hit to give investors an incentive to stick with the stock.

Go to www.businessweek.com to see all of our latest stories.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: stockman_scott who wrote (4551)4/28/2002 1:07:34 PM
From: trendmastr   of 4808
 
IBM inks storage deal with Adaptec
Fri Apr 26, 7:57 PM ET

Stephen Shankland CNET News.com

IBM has signed a deal to use Adaptec hardware for a new technology that links storage systems using conventional computer networks.

  Storage systems are increasingly communicating to servers over networks rather than through a direct, dedicated attachment, but to achieve high performance, the network must incorporate an expensive and complex communications standard called Fibre Channel.

IBM, Cisco Systems, Adaptec and others are pushing a technology called iSCSI that uses regular networks based on the less exotic Internet Protocol (IP) and Ethernet standards used in corporate networks, as well as the Internet itself, to skirt Fibre Channel.

The main drawback of iSCSI, though, is that preparing packets of information for the IP network sops up large amounts of processing power. To work effectively, iSCSI-based networks need special-purpose chips to handle data transfers only.

Under the deal announced Friday, Adaptec, a large manufacturer of network cards, will supply IBM with cards and chips that support iSCSI connections using 1-gigabit-per-second and 10-gigabit-per-second speeds, the companies said.

"This iSCSI design win validates Adaptec's architecture, chips and software," Merrill Lynch financial analyst John Roy said in a report Friday. "While IBM hasn't disclosed details of its plans for iSCSI products, usage of Adaptec's iSCSI technology across the complete IBM product line could add $70 (million to) $120 million in revenue over the next two years."

iSCSI is not yet a formally ratified standard. Supporters expect the technology to be standardized by mid-2002.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: trendmastr who wrote (4552)4/28/2002 1:30:50 PM
From: trendmastr   of 4808
 
From Barron's

April 29th, 2002

Blades Will Be Sharp When Buyers Start Buying Again

By BILL ALPERT

If anyone were buying servers, they'd want blade servers. Along with a Hollywood-sexy name, blade servers offer to slice the expense of running data centers, where big enterprises do their critical computing on racks of powerful computers known as servers. Blade servers reduce power bills, eliminate thickets of cable and save personnel costs.

The blade architecture disaggregates the pieces found inside a traditional server, says Colin Fowles, director of the blades business team at Sun Microsystems. Each blade card has a processor chip, DRAM memory chips and a hard disk drive, but other components, such as power supplies and cooling fans, are shared among server blades. The blades plug into a network backbone that runs up the rack. Network routers, switches and storage devices will also assume upright positions as blades, instead of the horizontal rack form they now assume.

The whole computer industry seems to be honing blade products. Firms such as Intel and BroadCom have chips. Pioneering blade server systems have been fielded by startups such as Cubix, Edgenera, LinuxNetworx and RLX Technologies. But the big computer firms are drawing their blades this year, including Compaq Computer, Dell Computer, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Sun.

Compaq leads the biggies, having introduced its ProLiant BL server in January. Mary T. McDowell, the senior vice president who runs Compaq's Industry Standard Server Group (and who's tapped to run that server group in the post-merger H-P), says Compaq has shipped more than 3,000 processor blades to date. Like Gillette, Compaq will sell you a ten-pack of blades -- for $17,091. In a rack space that held 42 traditional servers, the ProLiant BL crams 280 server blades. The system can run a mix of system software, with some blades running Microsoft Windows 2000 and others running Linux software from vendors such as Red Hat Software and SuSe.

Each Compaq blade has an Intel Pentium III chip that runs at low voltage to keep the densely-packed rack from overheating. By quarter's end, says McDowell, Compaq will be shipping blades with two processors per unit, going to four processors by year end. Intel is eager to supply server chips. At its analyst meeting Thursday, the company argued that its Itanium chips performed 30% to 48% better than Sun's SPARC processors, at as little as 20% of the cost.

Unhappy Returns: The Nasdaq Composite lost 2.9% on Friday and 7.4% on the week, to close at 1663.89. Intel failed to impress analysts at an annual gathering. Amazon.com's good quarter stood out among the week's many disappointing reports.

Sun will ship its blade products in the second half of this year, says blade boss Fowles. Like Compaq's, the Sun product will allow a software mix -- but in Sun's case, the mix will be Sun's Unix software running on its SPARC processors, or Linux running on Intel-compatible processors. Unlike Compaq, however, Sun plans to open its design to third-party firms that want to offer add-on blades specialized for network security or multimedia.

These early blade servers are best suited for simple computing jobs, like hosting Web pages. When manufacturers deliver multiprocessor blades, and faster internal networks, blade servers will take on heavier tasks such as running e-mail servers and Oracle databases.

While Compaq is clearly moving product, Sun blade man Fowles thinks that many customers will take 2002 to study the new offerings of H-P, IBM and Sun. Next year, he hopes blades will start flashing and eventually gain as much as a third of the server market.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: D. K. G. who wrote (4522)5/3/2002 2:54:37 AM
From: stockman_scott   of 4808
 
Secrets of the SAN

By Robyn Weisman
www.NewsFactor.com
Thu May 2, 1:20 PM ET


Just a decade or so ago, when having a 1 GB PC hard drive seemed the height of computing sophistication, the majority of enterprises employed simple methods to collect and classify their data.

Those firms that no longer relied on archived paper and microfilm had moved on to storing information using direct-attached storage devices hooked up to a single computer server. If they filled up that device or decided they needed a second backup copy, they would acquire another drive to fill the gap.

But with the exponential increase in the volume of storable information, relying on direct-attached storage became cumbersome and expensive in terms of both hardware and manpower. IT managers needed to find a way to consolidate and manage data in a cost-effective and secure fashion.

Enter the storage area network, or SAN.

SAN Hardware

Dan Tanner, a storage and storage management analyst at the Aberdeen Group, told NewsFactor that a SAN consists of peripheral storage connected to servers throughout a switched network.

In a basic SAN setup, server computers act as centralized hosts for directors, which typically are fiber channel adapters that transmit signals back and forth between servers and outlying devices.

Also present are switches, which determine the path for dispatching information throughout the network, and storage subsystems with hardware RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks) controllers.

SAN Software

A SAN uses logical unit number (LUN) management software to help IT managers identify individual hard disks within a RAID setup. It also uses remote mirroring software, which writes two copies of stored information on separate drives to safeguard an enterprise in case one of the devices fails.

Finally, the SAN uses point-in-time copy software, which makes either a physical or virtual copy of an enterprise's stored information at a given moment and stores it in case anything affects the dynamic version of the company's data.

Aberdeen analyst David Hill told NewsFactor that point-in-time software is important to a SAN because it acts as a snapshot of a company's data.

"Let's say that at 1 p.m., I make a copy of my data to store onto another set, [which] remains frozen in time," Hill said. "If a virus hits the server at 2 p.m., I can then at least reference the [data saved at] 1 p.m."

The Hard and Soft of It

Hill explained that two primary "hard" reasons compel enterprises to install and deploy SANs: a need to consolidate storage and a need to improve software backup management.

"When you consolidate and manage storage in a central pool, there is a better overall utilization of [it]," Hill said. "And because the data is centralized, enterprises can avoid adding additional managers to run" the system, making it more cost-effective.

Hill added that three additional factors, which he termed "soft" reasons, typically drive enterprises to use SANs: improved manageability, availability and flexibility of information storage.

"Organizations probably select at least one 'hard' reason and more than one 'soft' reason," Hill wrote in a recent white paper. "Hard reasons are the required results, and soft reasons are the optimal optional desired results."

Key to a Successful SAN

While many variables, including environment, cost issues and prior purchasing habits, determine the best SAN setup for a particular organization, one factor is essential to implementing a successful SAN.

"Make sure it's interoperable," Hill said.

Within this parameter, an enterprise has the option to set up a homogeneous SAN (in which all servers run the same operating system) or a heterogeneous version, in which servers that use different operating systems -- such as UNIX (news - web sites) and Windows NT/2000 -- are connected.

Big Players

According to Giga Information Group analyst Rob Enderle, the big players in the SAN space right now are EMC (NYSE: EMC - news), Hitachi and IBM (NYSE: IBM - news).

Aberdeen analyst Hill said those three companies often will purchase some of the components required to build their systems from such companies as switch manufacturer Brocade Communications Systems (Nasdaq: BRCD - news) and maker of data traffic directors McData.

The heightened data security environment, especially since the events of September 2001, has boosted awareness of the critical nature of effective data storage.

It stands to reason that as the volume of available information continues to expand in parallel with increasingly stringent security considerations, the SAN business is likely to generate significant profits for all players in the sector.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: David A. Lethe who wrote (4526)5/7/2002 5:14:49 PM
From: stockman_scott   of 4808
 
Any comments on this firm's potential...?

Bocada is an enterprise software company that provides interoperable, cross-vendor reporting, analysis and billing solutions for data storage operations. Backed by Madrona Ventures, Guide Ventures, Second Avenue Partners and Catamount Ventures, Bocada is headquartered in Bellevue, Washington.

bocada.com 

bocada.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.