Strategies & Market Trends | 50% Gains Investing


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Schnullie who wrote (107740)5/8/2012 10:27:18 AM
From: Jane4IceCream of 114389
 
I agree with your assessment however when "value" comes back to the market MHR should do very well. I do not know of any near term catalysts either from my own research however the sector trades on geo-political news and regardless of the seasonalitie we are possiblie experiencing there seems to be some cards up Gary's sleeve .....

Strong support for oil about 92ish or so...MHR trades with the sector it seems and is not the only stock being heavily shorted.

IMHO


Jane

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Schnullie who wrote (107740)5/8/2012 10:51:51 AM
From: Dale Baker of 114389
 
I am holding my super cheap MHR shares from the 2009 bottom so I will sit with them and wait however long it takes for the value to be priced in. if you do a sum of the parts with production, acreage and the pipeline system, it comes out a lot higher than the current enterprise value. Sooner or later that gap will close.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Schnullie who wrote (107740)5/8/2012 12:13:56 PM
From: Micawber of 114389
 
Jefferies & Company Maintains Magnum Hunter Resources at Buy, Lowers PT from $7.5 to $6.5

Read more: benzinga.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107742)5/8/2012 12:58:11 PM
From: Sam of 114389
 
Is there a recording or a transcript of the CC from last week somewhere? I have found other earlier ones, but not that one. Maybe they are waiting for the Baytex deal to close before giving out more information? I have seen various assessments of what the land in Divide county yields, some very promising some not so much. It is all just speculation from my own vantage point--absolutely no way of knowing. In any case, that could be a catalyst for a sharp pps move, either up or down.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sam who wrote (107744)5/8/2012 1:04:55 PM
From: Dale Baker of 114389
 
The CC recording is on their Web site, I listened to it just yesterday. It's not very long or detailed compared to previous CC's. The only notable thing I took away was that Bayetx was a bolt-on acquisition in an area where MHR already had interests, not a new venture. And they are keeping their eyes open for similar opportunities down the line.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107745)5/8/2012 1:07:12 PM
From: KaiserSosze of 114389
 
Dale,

I haven't had a chance to listen to the MHR call. You wrote "And they are keeping their eyes open for similar opportunities down the line."

Did Gary literally state that they are still considering additional acquisitions?
Many thanks.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107745)5/8/2012 1:15:39 PM
From: KaiserSosze of 114389
 
Anybody want to take a shot at who the target may be? Also, note the line about also looking at North American assets valued at around $1B...anyone know any company that fits that bill? :-)


United Energy in Talks to Buy Canadian Energy Producer
By Guo Aibing - May 4, 2012 12:00 PM ET

United Energy Group Ltd. (467), the Hong Kong-based explorer controlled by Chinese billionaire Zhang Hongwei, is in talks to buy a Toronto-listed oil and gas company for $1 billion, which would be its biggest purchase since 2007.

“We’ve had several rounds of discussions with our target company this year and both sides are seriously considering the terms,” Chief Financial Officer Thomas Pang said in an interview in Hong Kong yesterday. “We hope to get the deal done within the year.”

Pang declined to identify the company, saying only it’s a Toronto-listed independent energy producer with “strong” conventional oil and gas output. The company has a “simple” shareholding structure and the owners may want to sell to retire, he said.

The explorer may also target energy companies based in North America or Europe that are valued at about $1 billion and have producing assets in those locations, Africa or Southeast Asia, Pang said.

United Energy, which paid BP Plc (BP/) about $750 million for oil fields in Pakistan in 2010, seeks assets to feed demand in the world’s fastest-growing major economy. Funding will come from a $5 billion credit line obtained from state-owned China Development Bank Corp. in December 2010, which Pang said can be used to pay for as much as 80 percent of an acquisition.

United Energy, which also owns assets in China, has climbed 27 percent this year, compared with a 14 percent increase in the benchmark Hang Seng Index. (HSI) The stock closed unchanged at HK$1.67 in Hong Kong trading yesterday.

Natural gas in the U.S. was sold for less than 14 percent of average Asian liquefied natural gas prices in March because of increased output from shale reserves.
Canada Acquisitions

There were $8.7 billion in deals announced in Canada’s oil and gas industry in the first quarter, the busiest start to the year since 2009, when mergers and acquisitions in the sector there peaked at $47 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

United Energy plans to raise daily output at its onshore fields in Pakistan to as much as 30,000 barrels by the year-end, Pang said. Production from Pakistani assets was 24,700 barrels a day as of March 31, according to an April 24 release.

The company is looking for a partner to explore offshore assets in Pakistan, in which it controls 75 percent and the government owns 25 percent. United Energy can sell as much as 50 percent of its shares to a partner, Pang said.

“We have had discussions with several major offshore oil companies in the past months and we hope a deal can be struck soon,” Pang said. The company must invest at least $8 million in the offshore fields by February 2013 to qualify for an extension of the exploration rights from the Pakistan government, he said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Aibing Guo in Hong Kong at aguo10@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Amit Prakash at aprakash1@bloomberg.net

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: KaiserSosze who wrote (107747)5/8/2012 1:18:46 PM
From: Sam of 114389
 
MarkWest Energy to buy Keystone Midstream for $512 million

Related new:
Mon May 7, 2012 6:14pm EDT
reuters.com 

(Reuters) - MarkWest Energy Partners L.P. (MWE.N) said it will buy Keystone Midstream Services LLC for $512 million to boost its processing operations in the liquids-rich Marcellus shale.

Keystone, owned by Rex Energy Corp (REXX.O), Sumitomo Corp (8053.T) and Stonehenge Energy Resources LP, has assets in Butler County, Pennsylvania, including two cryogenic gas processing plants.

MarkWest -- a master limited partnership engaged in gathering, transporting, and processing natural gas -- anticipates gas volumes from Keystone to grow from the current rate of 40 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) to 170 MMcfd at the end of 2013, and to about 350 MMcfd by 2016.

The limited partnership said it plans to invest up to $500 million over the next five years to support Rex Energy's drilling program in the region.

As part of the investment, MarkWest also proposes to extend its planned natural gas liquids (NGL) pipeline from its Houston, Pennsylvania complex into Butler County.

Separately, Rex Energy said it will receive proceeds of about $120 million, higher than then $90-$110 million anticipated earlier. (Reporting by A. Ananthalakshmi in Bangalore; Editing by Anthony Kurian)

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: KaiserSosze who wrote (107746)5/8/2012 1:38:19 PM
From: Dale Baker of 114389
 
He said they are always looking, and they would consider opportunities in the areas where they are already working and established like they did with Baytex.

You know what "looking" means to a CEO, they may just kick tires for a couple of years or they may pounce on stuff they believe will add value.

S&P was dead right when they pointed out that MHR now has the opportunity to prove that all these pieces and parts can work together and scale up effectively. They are on the right track, IMHO.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: KaiserSosze who wrote (107747)5/8/2012 1:41:05 PM
From: Dale Baker of 114389
 
If it's Connacher, a billion is less than the current enterprise value. If they mean $1 billion in market cap that would be a dandy premium. I'd like to get that one off the books for good.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.