Strategies & Market Trends | 50% Gains Investing


Previous 10 | Next 10 
From: Paul Smith4/18/2012 1:55:37 PM
of 114422
 
CANACCORD - MAGNUM INCREASES EXPOSURE TO BAKKEN; SEE IMPACT AS LONG-TERM POSITIVE

Transaction details

Bakken Hunter (a subsidiary of Magnum Hunter Resources) announced the acquisition from Baytex of 50,414 net acres in North Dakota of non-operated assets with proved reserves of 12.4 Mmboe and production of 950 Boepd.

The price was $311 million in cash, or $25/Boe of proved reserves and $136,000/Boepd of daily production. The transaction values the leasehold at almost $6,170/acre before production and $4,662/ acre after backing out production at $80,000/ acre. MHR will be using its new $450 million senior secured term loan facility to fund this acquisition.

To expedite the drilling on newly acquired assets, management indicated that it will increase capex by approximately $50 million in the Williston Basin region. The company also plans to increase Eagle Ford capex, also by $50 million, which will be somewhat offset by lowering spending in the Appalachia by $25 million. Post
closure of this transaction, MHR will have an estimated $225 million of liquidity, allowing it to fund its 2012
capex of $225 million without tapping into the equity markets.

Investment highlights

Magnum trades at almost $27/Boe and $98,036/Boepd (Q1 estimate), and we believe the deal is accretive on
production and reserve estimates. We also view this transaction favorably as it meaningfully increases Magnum’s position in the Williston Basin to over 125,000 net acres. We remain constructive on the resource potential of the Bakken/ Three Forks. In our view, these resource opportunities offer meaningfully higher rates of return when compared with Magnum’s Appalachia assets in an environment of low natural gas prices.

Valuation

We maintain our BUY rating and our current price target of $8.50 per share, which is based on our break-up
value of $8.65 per share and is equivalent to approximately 5.4x our ‘13 EBITDAX estimate of ~$298.8M.

===========================

Let's all hope the Obama administration doesn't screw with fracking regulations and ruin this story.


Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: rllee who wrote (107484)4/18/2012 2:23:37 PM
From: Jerrymac of 114422
 
Hi rlee, this SA article from November touches all the bases between CHK & CHKR....certainly tied at the hip..

seekingalpha.com 

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: KyrosL who wrote (107482)4/18/2012 2:46:15 PM
From: Dale Baker of 114422
 
I haven't seen anything in the supply-demand equation for oil that should change things much; is that your guess or is there an argument with stats behind it?

Not to mention that because this acquisition is bank-financed, MHR will be under more pressure than ever to hedge much fo their future production, which is easy to do now in triple digits.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (107485)4/18/2012 2:47:04 PM
From: Dale Baker of 114422
 
Turns out they aren't going to prohibit or require anything until at least 2015, which means the whole thing is just an election year stunt to get a headline.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107488)4/18/2012 2:57:00 PM
From: KaiserSosze of 114422
 
I am getting concerned at the pace of acquisition from MHR. I'd like to see them take a quarter or two and just digest all of these while they shift more to oil from gas. Someone obviously thinks they overpaid (and this wasn't a cheap deal).

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: KaiserSosze who wrote (107490)4/18/2012 3:01:28 PM
From: Dale Baker of 114422
 
I agree; they said before they had all the property they needed then they bolt this on when they know that the market was already uncomfortable with the company's growing size. But like someone else said, MHR dips ad bounces pretty regularly. This is just another bump on the road.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (5)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107491)4/18/2012 3:05:45 PM
From: KaiserSosze of 114422
 
Spending almost half your market cap on a purchase isn't exactly a bolt-on to me. Gary, take a damn vacation already! :-)

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107488)4/18/2012 3:11:36 PM
From: KyrosL of 114422
 
I see a lot of things that would change supply/demand.

Iran may be defused later this year, increasing supply and removing uncertainty.

US gasoline demand keeps dropping. The US net imports are now back to early 90s levels and continue dropping. A serious push for NG for transportation seems to be developing which will accelerate this trend.

China growth is slowing. Especially the heavy oil consuming export sector. Growth in China may be shifting to services and local consumption which depend less on oil.

Europe is in a recession.

Japan may turn on some of its nukes.

Supply from Brazil, Canada, Iraq, Africa and the US is increasing.

Fracking is just starting in China, Latin America, Europe.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (107491)4/18/2012 3:28:30 PM
From: KaiserSosze of 114422
 
The more I think about it the more I dislike this acquisition by MHR. I really wonder if Gary isn't being overly reactive to the concerns that they're in too much gas right now, and saw this as a quick response to get more oily (albeit it a very expensive one)?

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (107483)4/18/2012 3:29:00 PM
From: Suma of 114422
 
I only wish that I were a grass hopper. I marry a stock. My trouble and every one I married has fallen into bad times.

I am down so much money from my investing in the inappropriate stocks that it's hard for me to jump for anything......

But thanks for the compliment. I would love to jump for joy.

Share Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.