SI
SI
discoversearch

   Strategies & Market Trends50% Gains Investing

Previous 10 Next 10 
To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (106598)2/9/2012 6:07:26 PM
From: KyrosL
of 118654
 
I find $0.007 very hard to believe. Do they include depreciation of the huge capital cost of the plant?

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: brasilboy46 who wrote (106600)2/9/2012 6:07:51 PM
From: JSB
of 118654
 
Thanks, I'll check it out.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: KyrosL who wrote (106601)2/9/2012 6:31:09 PM
From: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
of 118654
 
Here is the video:

video.cnbc.com

Listened again and he says "0.7 cents" then goes on to say 'NG in 2011 cost 5 or 6 cents and this [nuke] is below a cent".

The quotes are not exact but capture the statement.

ij

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (106603)2/9/2012 7:46:58 PM
From: Sam
of 118654
 
I have never seen a cost for nuclear power that low.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Sam who wrote (106604)2/9/2012 7:58:58 PM
From: Robohogs
of 118654
 
Could it be cash opearating cost?

Jon

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: Robohogs who wrote (106605)2/9/2012 8:50:22 PM
From: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
of 118654
 
I think he was talking about the fuel costs. But it is still quite interesting that the fuel cost can be 0.7 cents per kwh.

Another of the big costs is the capital used. Well this is the time to finance that with rates low.

And a big part of the cost of waste disposal could be turned into revenue instead of cost with the stroke of a Presidential pen if waste could be reprocessed as they do in France.

ij

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (106606)2/9/2012 8:58:51 PM
From: Sam
of 118654
 
If all they are talking about is the fuel cost, then the cost of solar is zero.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read


To: Dale Baker who wrote (106596)2/9/2012 9:24:49 PM
From: gizwick
of 118654
 
I have patiently waiting to short some of those heavily inflated solar stars. It seems to me that at some point investors will realize that they are investing in companies that have limited earnings potential.

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (1)


To: IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL who wrote (106598)2/9/2012 9:27:44 PM
From: tom pope
of 118654
 
Stunning is the word, indeed. .007 vs .05 hardly seems possible?

Share KeepReplyMark as Last ReadRead Replies (2)


To: gizwick who wrote (106608)2/9/2012 9:42:33 PM
From: Robohogs
of 118654
 
Solar stocks still down massively. Be careful there. I got burned a few times thinking the same.

Jon

Share KeepReplyMark as Last Read
Previous 10 Next 10 

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.