Subjects
Public Msgs
Members
Member Profiles
My Private Msgs
Yahoo! Quote
Advanced Search
[
sign in
]
Sponsor
Strategies & Market Trends
|
50% Gains Investing
Previous 10
|
Next 10
To:
IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
who wrote (
106598
)
2/9/2012 6:07:26 PM
From:
KyrosL
of 114415
I find $0.007 very hard to believe. Do they include depreciation of the huge capital cost of the plant?
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
brasilboy46
who wrote (
106600
)
2/9/2012 6:07:51 PM
From:
JSB
of 114415
Thanks, I'll check it out.
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
KyrosL
who wrote (
106601
)
2/9/2012 6:31:09 PM
From:
IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
of 114415
Here is the video:
video.cnbc.com
Listened again and he says "0.7 cents" then goes on to say 'NG in 2011 cost 5 or 6 cents and this [nuke] is below a cent".
The quotes are not exact but capture the statement.
ij
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
who wrote (
106603
)
2/9/2012 7:46:58 PM
From:
Sam
of 114415
I have never seen a cost for nuclear power that low.
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
Sam
who wrote (
106604
)
2/9/2012 7:58:58 PM
From:
Robohogs
of 114415
Could it be cash opearating cost?
Jon
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
Robohogs
who wrote (
106605
)
2/9/2012 8:50:22 PM
From:
IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
of 114415
I think he was talking about the fuel costs. But it is still quite interesting that the fuel cost can be 0.7 cents per kwh.
Another of the big costs is the capital used. Well this is the time to finance that with rates low.
And a big part of the cost of waste disposal could be turned into revenue instead of cost with the stroke of a Presidential pen if waste could be reprocessed as they do in France.
ij
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
who wrote (
106606
)
2/9/2012 8:58:51 PM
From:
Sam
of 114415
If all they are talking about is the fuel cost, then the cost of solar is zero.
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
To:
Dale Baker
who wrote (
106596
)
2/9/2012 9:24:49 PM
From:
gizwick
of 114415
I have patiently waiting to short some of those heavily inflated solar stars. It seems to me that at some point investors will realize that they are investing in companies that have limited earnings potential.
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (1)
To:
IRWIN JAMES FRANKEL
who wrote (
106598
)
2/9/2012 9:27:44 PM
From:
tom pope
of 114415
Stunning is the word, indeed. .007 vs .05 hardly seems possible?
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
|
Read Replies (2)
To:
gizwick
who wrote (
106608
)
2/9/2012 9:42:33 PM
From:
Robohogs
of 114415
Solar stocks still down massively. Be careful there. I got burned a few times thinking the same.
Jon
50% Gains Investing | Stock Discussion Forums
Share
Keep |
Reply
|
Mark as Last Read
Previous 10
|
Next 10
Home
Mail
Hot
SubjectMarks
PeopleMarks
Keepers
Settings
Terms Of Use
Contact Us
Copyright/IP Policy
Privacy Policy
About Us
FAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.
