Technology Stocks | George Gilder - Forbes ASAP


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: silicon warrior who wrote (4588)6/27/2000 9:55:00 AM
From: JDN   of 5853
 
Dear Silicon Warrior: No, I commend you for your honesty. I agree a good writer strives to communicate as clear as possible with the least amount of words. Thats how I was taught in College anyhow.
As to George's "picks" the problem is this market. People wait with baited breath and RUSH to buy his picks ASAP driving the price of the stock to unsupportable levels. I presume that they believe in the "greater fool theory" and expect to sell to the slower buyer. IMHO it is best to let his picks take their run, wait for the inevitable fallback and then, if you agree with his assessment enter the stock. Course best of all is to be in it before his pick comes out but then you wouldnt need the newsletter would you? JDN

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: w molloy who wrote (4589)6/27/2000 11:16:00 AM
From: silicon warrior   of 5853
 
I was hardly trained by the modern system, I have already celebrated my 25th reunion at the best damn place of all, whose pedigree in the great advances in science is beyond question. For God's sake, we have a hall of Nobel laureates. Some seek to obfuscate, others to impress, a very few work at truly informing. My sense is GG is a mix of all of these...human like all of us.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Roger Hess who wrote (4592)6/27/2000 2:07:00 PM
From: The Phoenix   of 5853
 
I think what you're suggesting would be frowned on by the SEC. ;) If Gilder were loading up on stocks just before recommending them and selling shortly thereafter (or those in the firm) Gilder would be looking for a new line of work.

OG

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: The Phoenix who wrote (4595)6/27/2000 2:21:00 PM
From: ratan lal   of 5853
 
I dont know of the legal situations with nesletters, but i do know companies where insiders have sold right after an announcement and the stock has tanked thereafter.

Look at OSIS with daily volume of around 30,000. Ther was an announcement of fiber optics in March. The stock traded 22,000,000 shares going up from 10 to 28. Insiders sold and the stock has steadily traded down thereafter.

I think the next announcement will similarly move the stock up 200%. However this time it might keep going up if, in fact, they receive orders for their fiber optics from someone like LU.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: ratan lal who wrote (4596)6/27/2000 2:24:00 PM
From: The Phoenix   of 5853
 
Insider selling after an announcement is distinctly different than insider selling before an announcement. A writer of a newsletter that buys big before making a recommendation will likely be investigated by the SEC - you can bet on it - especially if the writer (or those with inside knowledge) flips the stock.

OG

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: silicon warrior who wrote (4582)6/27/2000 8:04:00 PM
From: Big Sky   of 5853
 
I look at the Telecosm list as a place to get ideas for Buy and Hold stocks. That's the beauty of truly ascendant technology vendors.....their growth should have very long legs and you should be able to make over sized returns, even if your entry point is a bit too high.

I'm looking for companies that will give me 1000% returns over 10 years, not just shooting stars.

Read his newsletter, do your DD, pick an entry point and hang on for the long haul. These are risky stocks in the short term, but if they are truly pure plays in ascendant technology, you will be rewarded in the long term.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Big Sky who wrote (4598)6/28/2000 9:10:00 AM
From: John Westman   of 5853
 
A subscriber wading in here with a few comments. Perhaps the Gilder letter has become too popular. When I subscribed last year I bought QCOM on his redux issue and JDSU the following month. Both were moonshots and I was thrilled. (also took my profits off the table because I didn't think they could be sustained - so far right on qcom and the jury is still out on jdsu) Since Gilder started releasing the letter on line during market hours it has been impossible to catch the train. PRCM is a good example: I sat here and refreshed the screen until the report came up. Went to the back page, found PRCM switched to my online brokerage account and volumn was already 10 times normal. There is no way to make money in such an environment. Terrabeam was another great example: Following that through on the message boards, how many people jumped on Mead only to get killed when they discovered these guys made telescope mirrors. If you took advantage of the lag time from online to mail delivery, you were able to recover briefly and get out whole when the snail mail readers were sucked in with their online counterparts.

That said, the letter is interesting. But not the value it once was.

j

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Brad Rogers who wrote ()6/29/2000 1:56:00 AM
From: Big Sky   of 5853
 
Where does Gilder give notice when he's removing a company from his list? I notice that NXLK and Teligent have been removed, but I only noticed because I compared the current list with the March list.

He's good about including mention of new addition in a note at the bottom of page 8, and he highlights the new additions on the list, but I can't find any mention of dropping these two companies from his list.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Big Sky who wrote (4600)6/29/2000 1:40:00 PM
From: Exponent   of 5853
 
Go to page 7 of the April report where he writes about the loss of ascendancy etc.

--exp

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Clappy who wrote (4591)6/30/2000 8:23:15 AM
From: Marty Lee   of 5853
 
Dear claptonsguitar,

George has 76,000 common class A shares of WAVX stock. I believe he said he's little or no intention of doing any profit taking for several (5) years... :)

Sincerely,
Marty

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.