SiliconInvestor
     Advanced Search   [ sign in ]


Ads by Viral Stocks

 SI - Site Forums | Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members!

Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Phil(bullrider) who wrote (26614)6/28/2009 12:32:10 AM
From: Susie924   of 29466
 
I believe you are incorrect Phil.

I can't even do a search of old posts by people. As far as I can remember I used to be able to do that.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sr K who wrote (26615)6/28/2009 2:18:27 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)   of 29466
 
I read your post, but have zero understanding what your point was.

Phil

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Susie924 who wrote (26616)6/28/2009 2:23:32 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)   of 29466
 
Since I have not posted here in a good while, until recently, it was my understanding you could do limited searches, but not extended/unlimited searches.

Am I wrong?

Phil

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: Sr K6/28/2009 12:46:04 PM
   of 29466
 
Remove | Reset have reformatted to fall onto 2 lines

Remove |
Reset

So there's less info on one screen
siliconinvestor.com

so I prefer the layout before this change.

Using ie7.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sr K who wrote (26619)6/28/2009 3:03:40 PM
From: Sr K   of 29466
 
Bob:

The "reformatting" was caused by a new post on
Message 25745542

and its long Ticker of

AFN/AVFCF

Nevermind.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: SI Bob who wrote (26584)6/28/2009 4:25:12 PM
From: PC112 Recommendations   of 29466
 
Your response is pretty much what I expected. IMO whether you like it or not this site will be affected by the inevitable (my prediction) downfall over at your sister site. Hopefully this attempt at moving on to another venue to start this all over again will not fool anyone this time.

I know you won't answer this since I've attempted to ask this question 3 times at SI and at least 4 times at IHUB. How could a paid subscriber get a permanent boot over the questioning of IHUB Admin's cozy relationship with IRP's (disclosed and undisclosed)? Looking back Bob you must admit that my predictions look to be somewhat legitimate. How can so many requests for an explanation be ignored? Would similar requests by an IRP be similarly ignored?

Also, how in God's earth can the TOU violation (listed below) not cause temporary suspensions in the accounts of ALL posters INDICTED by the SEC? Please notice the word "suspected" in the paragraph below. Seems like a pretty simple decision to me.

Any suspected fraudulent, abusive or illegal activity may be grounds for termination of your membership account and may be referred to appropriate law enforcement authorities.

I will continue my goal to send daily e-mails to all advertisers at both sites (detailing the current dilemma with the SEC and the blatant course of inaction by management) until management starts to display a small amount of integrity in this situation.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: SI Bob who wrote (26455)6/28/2009 4:39:18 PM
From: chichi2   of 29466
 
SI bob, do you plan to add chart capablity?
chi2

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: PC11 who wrote (26621)6/28/2009 4:44:43 PM
From: SI Dave8 Recommendations   of 29466
 
I got to boot you six times at iHub and now here for an even 7. Well done!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: PC11 who wrote (26621)6/28/2009 8:28:40 PM
From: churak1 Recommendation   of 29466
 
Any suspected fraudulent, abusive or illegal activity may be grounds for termination of your membership account and may be referred to appropriate law enforcement authorities.

What part of "may be" don't you understand? Termination is an option that always was & will be at the discretion of ADMIN...get over it.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: churak who wrote (26624)6/28/2009 9:16:10 PM
From: Sr K   of 29466
 
What part of Banished don't you understand?

Seriously, "may be grounds for termination" could easily be "is grounds for termination". The judgment comes in as to whether to apply the grounds for a particular situation. IMJ.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQ
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.