Technology Stocks | Excite@Home (ATHM)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Educator who wrote (7009)3/28/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: KW Wingman   of 29968
 
*OT*
I don't think Clinton is the type to back down:

Gurrrrr!!!! Clinton=Lying, no honor, MFingDH; Ouch.

Please don't bring that despicable, no honor, draft dodging person, into any conversation regarding honor and/or war and ATHM.
Clinton has proven many times that he will ONLY do what he thinks is best for himself.

Thank you very much,

Wingman

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Perry Ganz who wrote (7018)3/28/1999 12:42:00 AM
From: Educator   of 29968
 
Perry- ADSL vs. xDSL

I did a little searching for you. I hope this link is able to clear up the differences between the two digital systems.

Take care,
Ed

tuanz.org.nz 


Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: KW Wingman who wrote (7021)3/28/1999 12:51:00 AM
From: Educator   of 29968
 
****OT**** KW- Are you a Republican? Military man? Relative of Lewinski's? All three? Sorry to ruffle your feathers. I didn't think my post had anything to do with honor. If it had, I wouldn't have included his name. I agree with most of what you said. Besides, I am an independent and did not vote for him.

Hang in there with your fearless leader. You have less than two years.:0)

Ed

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: roly who wrote (7020)3/28/1999 1:36:00 AM
From: FIRENZA   of 29968
 
Protect your investment in ATHM go to this link.

216.46.228.90 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Eski who wrote (6997)3/28/1999 2:01:00 AM
From: Dave R   of 29968
 
With all the positives in the news, especially the Barrons article, ATHM is going to open up at least 2-3. Just my opinion.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Perry Ganz who wrote (7018)3/28/1999 2:29:00 AM
From: Boplicity   of 29968
 
There are so many variants of DSL that I use xDSL. The A stands for asymmetrical. Distance limitation are real and will not be solved, unless they move to a distributive like network, where CO like functions are moved closer the users. I have yet to hear anything like what I just described above being discussed by the REBOCS, or, for that matter anyone else.

I like AWRE.

You are right cable is a shared medium, and we have seen real world examples of bogged down cable access. But, it's way too early in the game to be talking about plagues yet.

Greg

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: E. Davies who wrote (6948)3/28/1999 3:04:00 AM
From: KW Wingman   of 29968
 
>>"Ahhaha has been great entertainment for this thread lately and always a fascinating education in seeing what really is going on without the blinders most of us wear".>>

Eric, You are 100% right on about the entertainment value. <:}
The educational value is questionable. I agree with ahhaha at least half of the time but he has too many wrongs and they don't make one right.

>>Ahhaha is far too smart to think he can have the slightest effect on a stock this size and so are you.>>

??? I have no strong position on this. I do not agree with what you said but you may be correct. In the long term you may be correct and even that is debatable. This is the age of the internet. What is the effect of negative publicity on a stock?, can trashing a stock effect it long term prospects? These high growth companies need to maintain a high perceived future value to maintain and increase the value of their currency (stock). With enough negative propaganda, and if you talk down a company enough any you can lower the value of it's currency. Anybody can start that ball rolling IMO.

>>He's short/medium term bearish. Maybe now showing signs of still being long term bullish. But he has his eyes wide open. Shouldnt we?
Eric >>

Agree, we should keep our eyes open at all times. I was just asking Ahhaha to explain the inconsistency in his position (which he has not done). Why oh why, should a person be short term bearish at all -IF- ???????? -- (READ and understand THIS) IF ---- they believe that it is best to buy at the TOP and hold LONG TERM AND FORGET ABOUT IT. -- GIVEN: A current stock price of 150 and they believe the future stock price will reach $28,000 in a few years???


<<PS I'd say that Ahhaha started taking this stance the strongest after the XCIT merger. This merger still is a shock to me and a big
A "pump & dump"? Gimme a break, would you people just get off this manipulation theory? These kinds of posts are inane.
question mark in my mind whether it was genius or foolishness. It was a huge risk and it definitely changes the entire nature of the company. >>

Ahhaha may say the market knows nothing, most everyone else says the market knows everything. I am inclined to believe the latter. If so, this market not only likes but loves the XCIT merger with ATHM. This is evidenced by both stocks increasing in value every since day one when the merger was announced. ATHM should have dropped due to the premium paid to XCIT shareholders but it did not.

Personally, I think the merger is super great for both companies.

Regards,

Wingman

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Educator who wrote (7023)3/28/1999 3:36:00 AM
From: KW Wingman   of 29968
 
*OT*
Hello Educator,

I'll give you a "C" on this one. I should give you an "A" for affort for dealing with those kids/brats <:} . Hopefully you have mostly normal kids and only a few few brats. The kids would be enjoyable, I would not know how to handle the brats.

You had 1.5 right. Military yes, Lewinski no, Republican 1/2

I also am sort of independent. I did not vote for Clinton or even Bush. I would say that I am in the libertarian wing of the Republican party.

Clinton is not my leader, he is having enough problem trying to lead HRC, he has no time to devote to leading me. <:}

Regards,

Wingman



Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Dave R who wrote (7025)3/28/1999 4:03:00 AM
From: Jan Garrity Allen   of 29968
 
I agree it is very positive!! Good Luck!!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Jan Garrity Allen who wrote (7029)3/28/1999 7:52:00 AM
From: Craig A   of 29968
 
David Alger interview in today's Bear-ons:
From Raging Bull fame..
'Q: You're also a fan of @Home, which is moving up after the deal between Comcast and MediaOne.
A: It's a great deal. We still own a very large position in Comcast. We think the cable companies are the Internet providers of the future. The fact that suddenly Comcast will have this access to homes is just massively exciting.

Q: What's the case for @Home?
A: It's a truly interesting company with a unique place in this business. The problem with the Internet, as any user will tell you, is lack of bandwidth. It is too slow to retrieve. You can't get good, full-motion video. A guy sitting at home is frequently frustrated by the access time. This problem needs to be solved. One solution is to put the Internet over cable television, which is a much bigger band width, rather than through the phone line. @Home is the leading company to do that. It has deals with just about every cable company -- TCI, Cox, Comcast, Cablevision. The only ones it's now lacking are Warner Communications and MediaOne, which of course is being taken over by Comcast. At the end of 1998, @Home had 300,000 subscribers hooked up to this system. It's rising sharply. They just announced the acquisition of Excite, a leading portal company. It's a content provider. This lets @Home offer not only the ability to hook up cable TV and get much faster Internet service, but also provide its own proprietary portal.

Q: How much is it growing? What's the stock worth?
A: Right now, @Home sells for about 138, having risen fairly sharply in the last couple of days. I would be perfectly comfortable seeing the stock at 200 in the next couple of years. I think it will have a million subscribers at yearend. Their market cap is $17 billion, which is a very high valuation per subscriber. However, by the end of 2002, we expect them to have over eight million subscribers. Assuming @Home is at 200, it would have a market cap of about $35 billion, or $4,375 per subscriber. That's comparable to many cable TV companies. Another way to look at it is that, in 2002, we expect the combined @Home/Excite to generate revenues of $2.2 billion, and earnings per share of around $3. A valuation of 70 times earnings would put the stock at $210. Please note that the company will still be growing at an extremely high rate at this point.'

He also likes BCST in the interview.

And the robins be dancing in the sun here!

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.