Arent you an Attorney? Plus, you have info as to what is happening at the trial? How do you have info that others do not have?....You said RMBS will get a huge verdict....in another post you said they would get more from the verdict then it's entire Market Cap.....Yep, that would have been a huge verdict but as we now see, you never knew what was going on at the trial, your Attorney Skills appear to be lacking, and you may end up correct about the verdict being equal to RMBS market cap......They got $0.00, so if RMBS ends up dead and at $0.00, which is likely, imo, you can actually say you were correct about one thing.....LOL......................................RMBS HAS NOTHING NOW...Never really did, imo, but now the courts sealed the deal ensuring they never will have anything as well......Courts basically told us what we already knew....RMBS had a flawed business plan destined for failure.....They should have tried to actually work to make money.......This had failure written all over it long ago.......
<<
From: hdl 8/30/2011 5:11:54 AM To: Jeffry K. Smith who wrote ( 93401) of 93456 i have info re what is happening at the trial.
liability is clear. question is the damages. mu and hynix are arguing rdram would have failed even if they hadn't price fixed to kill it. bloomberg cites testimony of two low level intc employees, not that of high level employee and slides and letters of heads of intc and intc policy. intc switched to ddr from rdram because mu, hynix and others would not support rdram. they didn't want to pay rmbs royalties. they couldn't compete with samsung re rdram.
the trial will be over in one month. there will be a huge verdict for rmbs.
rmbs and mu trade as if the AT litigation didn't exist. they go up and down with semi sector. mu and rmbs were up yesterday. they are down since start of the trial.>> |
