Politics | Idea Of The Day


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (21111)10/29/1998 10:04:00 AM
From: James Strauss   of 50161
 
Ike:

The S&P 500 needs to break through 1120 for a continuation to the old highs... 1120 represents intermediate term trendline resistance... Until this happens we'll be in a trading range as you have so accurately suggested...

iqc.com 

Jim

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (21108)10/29/1998 10:05:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF   of 50161
 
Thursday, Oct 29 1998 7:56AM ET

Ike: You stand firm and stable like a lighthouse beacon in stormy seas. Thank you for your most admirable consistency and talent.

I am doing great in SUNW, CTXS (saw it's on your watch list) Intel and Cisco. I am accumulating FORE and XYLN on pull backs for a more speculative investment.

Glad to see that you are at home in London my old home town. I just got back from Japan and Thialand. The Thias have to be the friendliest people in the world and the food is great too.

Take care and as the Buddist believe your good deeds will return to you.
Warmest regards,


Sir- If I don't do that SI will become a paradise of bears we hold the fine line and balance where gloom and doom prophets are told to bury their stories of the end of the world where they sew all of them together in the 'den of self inflicted pain and short trades',I maintained amidst this absolute gloom a position of strength, my private mail indicates that how many members did not sell at the worst time they are all thankful and this is the best reward as I say I saved that little investors from gnaws of a perpetual shorts, this self employed gurus of SI has nothing to loose but in absence of my thread the positions lost by a small investor would have wiped out many a equity, longs eventually se their levels shorts are wiped in thinn air, since I don't join them in chorus I have decided to keep this thread as a firm voice of reason over dooms day predictors.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: James Strauss who wrote (21112)10/29/1998 10:11:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF   of 50161
 
I have my own reservations on DOW old highs I would think that composite old highs will meet DOW at 10,000. So we can see a lot of rally, as I right now see an apparent break out in SOX, a double bottom and a 20 days MA crossing over 50 days a sure sign of a two to three months of strong rally in SOX, I will like to bet on Jan 300 even selling 220's and cover them break of 245-- for conservative accounts they can wait for 1755 or 1080--- I addthis chart with my chart of $ weakeness and associate $ weakeness with techs, the only thing I see we go higher, unless some fundamental news derail the market, so one hand I am watching BKX for a decisive move above 730 on the other I am looking at a break of 710 and 690 if that happens we wil see every thing in a downturn until 1055 or 1680 holds so we have whole range of movements here to watch and we are trying our best to do it right..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: Ross who wrote (21098)10/29/1998 10:21:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF   of 50161
 
Ross ECI is up 1% and that is what I have always said that very soon they will talk of inflation and not deflation, strong economy will in presence of liquidity problems will produce great numbers going forward but some smart ass will soon come out and say hey stop man why this ECI is still higher by 1 % where is the gini of deflation-- the point is we are right now going thru a liquidity crunch look at the swap rates once these rates stabilise we will see that strong economic growth will do good for demand and corporate profits we may not be in corporate recession anyway, so we will have these conflicting camps developing the camp who will fear infaltion and a camp who will fear falling prices as a result of global liquidity crunch but al said and done we have no inflation and strong economy with lower interst rates can result in some strong rallies, although we will see ocassional sell offs- but these inflationary feared sel offs on back of strong numbers will be ocassions to go long..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (21114)10/29/1998 10:35:00 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF   of 50161
 
RESEARCH> > First Data Corp. (FDC) $25.81 EPS (FY Dec): 1998E $1.57, 1999E
$1.73> - Market Outperformer
> * We have removed our Trading Buy and now rate FDC shares Market
> Outperformers. The shares are up 25% from our upgrade 2 months ago
> versus 12% for the S&P 500. We believe some modest reductions inthe
> consensus estimates for 1999 may still be ahead, and may hampernear
> term stock performance. In addition, a return to double digitearnings
> growth may occur in the second half versus our previous Q1/99estimate.
> Our 1998 EPS estimate of $1.57 (up 6% Y-Y) remains unchanged, butwe
> have trimmed our 1999 estimate a nickel to $1.73 (up 10% Y-Y).>
> Nokia (ADR) (NOKA) $85.38 EPS (FY Dec): 1998E $3.15, 1999E $3.90 -
> Recommended List
> * Even with easy comparisons, Nokia had an otherworldly set of third
> quarter figures. Mobile phone sales of $2.4bn in the third quarter
> rocketed the company to the leading industry spot - Nokia sold 1m
> handsets in a single week - and infrastructure growth stayedstrong at
> 42%. Group margins of 19.5% were a record on flat inventories. Weare
> raising our EPS estimates by 17% for 1998 to FIM16.9 ($3.15) andfor
> 1999 to FIM19.5 ($3.90) and reiterate our Recommended List rating,
> although shares could face pressure simply because they are only8% off
> 1998 US dollar highs.
> * Mobile phone sales were outstanding - up 94% versus a weaker third
> quarter 1997 - with Nokia having produced and sold 1m units in asingle
> week in September; Nokia has become the world's largest producer of
> mobile phones by value ($2.4bn), outselling Ericsson and Motorola.We
> estimate margins in the mobile phone business reached 19% in the
> quarter, based not on new platforms but the numerous permutationsof
> existing ones. Nokia was confident about further growth in thefourth
> quarter and into 1999, based on the breadth and positioning of its
> product portfolio.
> * Nokia also maintained a high 42% growth rate and 22%+ margins inits
> Telecoms infrastructure, indicating a number of GSM networkexpansion
> orders, new transmission sales in Germany and the UK and equallystrong
> demand in wireline as wireless products. Nokia has a number ofother
> niche technologies which are promising and is proactivelyattacking its
> cost base through outsourcing deals to allow for greaterflexibility in
> its cost base and lower working capital requirements.
> * Capital gains on the sales of LK Products were FIM177m, but even
> adjusting for these and small currency gains, operating marginswere> 19%
> for the group - a record level of profitability. Nokia managed 45%
> higher sales in the nine-month period on the same level ofinventories
> and looks on track to make a staggering 50% return on capitalemployed
> in 1998. A critical point with Nokia is management's unwavering> guidance
> - save to exceed expectations - deserving of a premium rating. Wesee
> our estimated P/E multiple of 22.5 times as low relative to its25%+
> earnings growth record, as, in our view, Nokia has emerged from
> near-death in the early 1990s (and a 1995 stumble) as one of thebest
> run, most investor-friendly companies in Europe.>
> Ultratech Stepper, Inc. (UTEK) $18.13 EPS (FY Dec): 1998E $-0.51,1999E
> $0.45 - Market Performer
> * Ultratech Stepper reported September Q3 operating LPS of $0.34(vs. EPS
> of $0.25), wider than our estimates $0.10 LPS, and the Street LPSof
> $0.08. Orders $20 million, down 13% sequentially and down 44%
> year-over-year, but $42 million backlog included $18 million in Q3
> adjustments. Cutting 1998 operating LPS to $0.51 (vs. operatingEPS of
> $1.04) from $0.28 and shaving $0.05 from 1999 EPS of $0.50 to$0.45.
> Maintaining our Market Performer rating.>
> America Online (AOL) $114.94 EPS (FY Jun): 1999E $1.00, 2000E$1.75 -
> Recommended List
> * America Online (AOL) reports its Q1 (Sept.) f99 quarter thisTuesday> the
> 27th after the close. Our revenue, EPS, and net worldwidesubscriber
> addition estimates are $846m, $0.23, and 677k (to 15.3m),representing
> y/y growth rates of 60%, 230%, and 28% respectively. We believeSept.
> has been strong, providing potential upside to our EPS and sub.est.,
> possibly by $0.01-.02 and 250k+ net additions. In addition, keymetrics
> like rev/sub, adv./commerce growth, retention, usage, ad/ecommerce
> backlog, and cash flow should all show robust growth. Reit. Rec.List.
> * Overall, the quarter should prove to be a solid start to the
> traditionally strong
> Q2 (Dec.) and Q3 (Mar) fiscal periods. Gross margins should belittle
> over > 36% despite the stronger subscriber additions and usage, a benefitof
> AOL's > large scale network buying economies of scale. We expect good cost
> controls > on opex, with strong marketing efficiency to yield operating
margins of> over 11%,
> with profitability on the core subscriber business despite verystrong
> subscriber > adds and usage. In addition, mgmt. should be upbeat on its
ability to> supplement
> to its large, ecommerce partner list, adding, replacing, andupgrading
> existing > ecommerce partners at attractive economic terms.
> * Going forward, we expect the following events to be positivecatalysts
> for the shares: (1) Anticipation of strong Christmas quarter, (2)> Roll-
> out of 'AOL Checkout' in the next few weeks, a feature that allowsAOL
> members to do one-click ordering on AOL affiliated merchants onAOL and
> on the web, (3) Initial roll-out of 'You've got Pictures' jointventure
> with Kodak in the November/December time-frame (see our detailednote
> dated 5/20/98), (4) Additional progress on the broadband partnering
> front, potentially by end of calendar '98, (5) possible stocksplit,> (6)
> Further progress on financial and operational fronts for AOL.com,ICQ,
> and AOL International, and (7) On-going ecommerce announcementsfor all
> the AOL brands.
> * Our fiscal (June) '98, '99 and '00 revenue and EPS estimates are
> $2.6billion/$0.55, $3.8b/$1.00, and $4.8b/$1.75, respectively. We
> continue to view these estimates as conservative, both on the topand
> bottom line, and expect upward revisions assuming on-going, strong
> execution by management. We reiterate our Recommended for Purchase
> rating on AOL shares, and continue to view it as our favorite pickfor
> 1998.>
> JetForm Corporation (FORMF) $14.31 EPS (FY Apr): 1999E $0.78, 2000E
> $1.04 - Market Outperformer
> * We recently checked in with management of JetForm. The pipeline of> deals
> going into the end of its second (October) fiscal quarter isreportedly
> at record levels and business appears to be going well, but we note
> that JetForm is dependent on end of quarter deal closings and the
> business has historically shown volatility, so the quarter isn'tover
> until its over. The shares traded down recently on somecontroversy
> over accounting issues, which we do not view as new news, and thestock
> has now begun to recover. No change in our market outperformerrating.> >
> TECH TEAM DAILY *Tech Chat Only* October 26, 1998>
> Our recent ITC note included some comments from competitors on LTX
> Corp regarding its absence from the show floor, its shipment of aFusion
> test system to National Semi, and LTX's ability to ship Fusion involume.
> We spoke with LTX management on Friday, which passed on the following
> clarifications: (1) LTX saved $400,000 by not having a booth on theshow
> floor, but met with customers offsite. (2) The test system sent to
> National was a full-blown Fusion, and not a Delta STE upgrade. (3)The
> company expects to ship three units in Q1, seven in Q2, and 14 in Q3,with
> no constraints on deliveries. (Miller)>
> Sun Micro has a big day on Tuesday, announcing Solaris 2.7, the
> 64-bit version of its operating system. This will be fully compatible
> with the current 32-bit version and will add more usability, security,
> directory services, and Java features. (Conigliaro) >
> Computer Reseller News indicates that IBM has landed a couple of
> major new OEMs for its latest line of mobile drives. Compaq andGateway
> will be using the drives, which include IBM's Drive Fitness Test
> technology, allowing users to do some fast diagnostic testing. Volume
> shipments begin in February. (Conigliaro/Schutte)>
> It sounds like IBM has learned its lesson of having come very late
> to market with a sub-$1000 PC and, as a result, will be the first ofthe
> top-tier PC companies to break the $600 barrier. By late November,IBM is
> expected to introduce a $599 Aptiva PC using a 300 MHz chip fromCyrix.
> (Conigliaro)>
> Microsoft's Windows NT 5.0 Beta 3 is due out by late November, with
> final availability expected in the second half of 1999, although some
> reports still indicate that partners are preparing for a spring of1999
> release. At NetWorld+Interop in Atlanta last week, Microsoftdemonstrated
> several new features that are to be included in Beta 3, which isexpected
> to be the first feature complete version of the upcoming new releaseof
> Windows NT. The new features unveiled last week include new scalable
> clustering and updated terminal services support. Missing from the
> product is synchronizing with third-party directories such as NDS. PC
> Week indicates that Microsoft also will integrate its COM+ (Component
> Object Model+) object
> plumbing architecture into the base operating system code. Beta 3 is
> likely to feature working DirectX and OpenGL multimedia and graphics
> components. (Sherlund).>
> Friday, we met Friday with Lucent's Carly Fiorina to get some
> longer-term perspective on the industry after all the recent press onthe
> prospects for slower growth in 1999. While little has changed sincethe
> September analyst meeting, and she remains extremely confident aboutthe
> growth outlook for 1999, we were able to get more detail on someproducts
> and regions. Of particular note was Carly's confidence in Asianbusiness,
> which grew in 1998 despite the turmoil and is expected to grow in1999.
> The Asian forecasts for fiscal 1999 "are in the bag, with room for
> upside," according to Carly. While that business is only about 10% of
> sales, it is one region where few companies claim much visibility fornext
> year. Goldmans Sachs

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: James Strauss who wrote (21109)10/29/1998 10:51:00 AM
From: Merritt   of 50161
 
James:

You make a point with next year comparisons, but I'm not sure many stockholders agree with the short-term affect.<G> Right now, I'm more concerned with how much exposure they have to China (I don't have any position in BAC, at present).

Best regards, Merritt

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (21102)10/29/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: steve susko   of 50161
 
thanks, for the eloquent explanation.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: steve susko who wrote (21118)10/29/1998 3:50:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF   of 50161
 
...Steve-- it is important for a trader to know immediate history of the market on finger tips, I have been since that 1320 bounce been very vocal and critical of established wisdom on SI for one simple reason, if you go back to 17th July 1996 and 26th July 96, on the charts you will see SOX hitting the lows the level of composite when SOX made those lows was 1022 and DOW was around 5550, comes Nov 28th if I remember correct and Dec 2nd and third we had this 770 test on S&P, rather we had a double top, now for me 'market is history' and imediate history is the most important note to be a good trader, on 7th dec composite hit this magical 1320 again composite also made a double top and retreated until Jan where it went sideways, now for me this level was a strong resistance on my way up as my 'bhumbo primary' was on the way up in Jan 97 ( I was positive on IBM and talked about IBM in one of earlier posts on IBm thread before I had this Idea thread I was told to shut up by a man who thought that IBm at 45$ is a great sell- it is always deliberate to force voice of reason out of Si and mercenaries of the prophets of dooms are always ready to pounce on any voice of reason, old established tradition of SI, it was after IBM rebuke I decided to go free LANCE AND HAD MY OWN THREAD, a small corner but effective as hell, gives enough pain to the perpetual shorts..and an oasis of calmness in hard times for small invesotrs who wait out their to see if reason still has some life in it..MU at 38 and INTC at 90 is the biggest blow to these guys who think MU and INTC should have been at 5 and 45, whenever that happens I will be in forefront of that frontal attack on markets- if markets slide we will be a part of it ..

I knew that level of 1320 and had highlighted it as early as mid Aug in one of my posts as critical support I also said that if we take 690 and 1498 out on BKX and composite we go down to 850 the Oct 28th lows on SPZ..

What happened that day when we were testing that two years low of 1320 on Oct 7th or 8th, I could relate that level with 6300 and 770 with S&P I distinctly remebered on my bed oh I am getting this market at a cut price, I could see that we are testing those levels which were outside any reasonable correction anticipated by worst of bears, now here comes what I call the 'path of least resitance' that market takes if you combine this with voltality here on this last test of 1320 we had the biggest bear trap ever led for bears, the pro's bought puts and I have info that nearly every major house was short that resulted into that big short covering rally.

\\\\\For me market is not about moving on, it is about knowing and acknowledging the errors, I learn from these errors by recollecting history I create one, the test of calibre is to know your levels.

I could imagine if any of these gurus would have read the 1320 level historically or had any serious involvement with market they would have sold their houses at 1320 and gone long, that was the opportunity you were getting in at DOW 6300 and SP 770- a level they all wanted to see it was there right in front of them and they were urging people to buy puts, it is story of shame and highest level of professional incompetence and I say it so loud and clear to let myself know that markets grinds the fools' and awards the people who are ready to take opportunity, time and time again we will get these opportunities it is seen more often than not that bulls end up owning the opportunities on the way down and on the way up, buying puts is most dangerous at lowest of correction levels,I keep reminding them all the time like I remieded them when they shorted the first move from 1755 to 2000 and 690 to 950 on BKX..]

Owning at 1320 we saw DOW at 6300 which was actually at 7330 and S&P at 770 which was 834 but in composite interrelation we had hit the worst of lows, since mine is an academic thread and mine is thread where I challenge this predominant bearish feeling on SI single handedly expounded by prophets of 'gloom and doom'. Market is history it is a mosiac you got to fill the colors right otherwise instead of a master piece one ends up owning a fake, we got to keep testing with volatility of the markets if our barometers are weather fit..ggg..

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (20988)10/29/1998 4:05:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF   of 50161
 
so I predicted like ''but composite 1680 is now a fact I would think we soon hit 1755 soon-- 1755 the only thread to highlight this composite level as reisistance - trading thru cross relationships, an Idea art..
To: +steve susko (20988 )
From: +IQBAL LATIF Tuesday, Oct 20 1998 5:12PM ET
Reply # of 21120

Market failed today at 8652 i.e. 8600 resistance-- I think we will see IBM and MSFT leading markets higher-- but composite 1680 is now a fact I would think we soon hit 1755 soon-- I think we will see a lot more improvemnt in composite and small caps-- DOW may see the short term high at 8900-- from where it will re-trace to 1030 level on SPZ-- On earnings- absolutely this fits in perfectly with my overall projections made in middle of carnage- strong economy brings strong numbers- I was just thinking as to the causes of todays decline in late hours I think some smart ass would have rightly thought if earnings are so good may be we don't see Fed cutting beyond Nov- but I think cuts or no cuts a market which builds in prices for close outs will move higher.. the market was expecting real bad numbers it is pleasantly surprised..



Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (21120)10/29/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: oexplayer   of 50161
 
IKE:

Nice call on composite and BKX! Do you see this close as a decisive argument for another leg up? Did you follow MU today? Seems to me in 1995, MU proved to be the precursor for explosive up-side move by SOXX. Do you see the same correlation as I do? Thanks in advance!

Kevin

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.