To set the record straight,
President Bush did
not pick the fight with Iraq.
A group of terrorists
backed by saddam hussein did.
India and Pakistan didn't try to hit NYC with
jumbo jets loaded with fuel. A group of terrorists
backed by saddam hussein did.
The "situation" with N. Korea has been with "us" since
the Korean war. It hit the news-mongers as "gee, we
ought to report this 'cause it makes for more papers
sold, and look at the profits". Same with TV. It's
a matter of sensationalism.
BTW, President Bush at this point in time has no plans
to go up against Korea, and it would be better (at
least at this point in time) to not do so. To agree
with you, spend money on Korea.
The economic hassle was set in place before President
Bush got into office, due mostly to the collapse of the
stock market bubble that had formed around the internet.
and the changeout position of the potential Y2K problem,
which turned out to be much less serious than most
suspected. More media hype. Heck, the pro's had
started solving this hassle back in 1997. However,
Y2K did lead to over-capicity, but at this point in time
I see a need to replace the PC's that were bought way
back when. Check out the earnings of DELL today.
The market is starting to turn around. Much of the huge
movements, up or down, are caused by the "traders" who
are unwilling to sit on a stock for any period of time.
The LARGE funds are unwilling to take any position at
all.
Bottom line, "You don't pay a dog to not bite you,
you, instead, eliminate the dog". This should have
been done back in both the Bush (sr.), and clinton
(do nothing) era.
Take Care... |
