Strategies & Market Trends | Bosco & Crossy's stock picks,talk area


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: SOROS who wrote (19484)4/9/2006 12:31:58 PM
From: Land Shark   of 37378
 
Here's some interesting reading on ethanol from biomass:

pacificethanol.net 

There seems to be only one study/detractor from the idea - Berkely's Patzek and Pimentel who assert that there's a net negative energy balance from ethanol. Some say he's using '91 technology in his analysis and that efficiencies in the industry have drasticly improved. For instance, plants are recycling energy and using new methods of processing grain. The vast majority of recent studies have shown a postive energy balance. Incidently, Patzek heads the UC Oil Consortium which receives oil industry funding.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

From: allevett4/9/2006 12:54:27 PM
   of 37378
 
Nigerian militants warn Shell men not to return
Published: Saturday, 8 April, 2006, 09:33 AM Doha Time

LAGOS: Militants whose attacks have shut a quarter of Nigerian oil output threatened yesterday to execute anyone found on previously attacked oil platforms operated by Royal Dutch Shell.
The threat came as the oil giant said it hoped to return staff to an abandoned offshore oilfield in Nigeria within days.
The Nigerian government has been putting pressure on Western multinationals, particularly Shell, to send workers back to fields abandoned after a string of attacks and kidnappings in February.
“Anyone found on Shell platforms previously attacked will be executed,” the militant Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) said in an e-mail.
But Shell’s exploration and production chief Malcolm Brinded said he was encouraged by talks between the government and leaders from the Niger Delta designed to resolve the crisis.
“We have got to go and review the assets when the security situation allows, but I am hopeful that will be soon,” Brinded told reporters at an oil conference in Paris, referring to the EA field off Nigeria’s Atlantic coast.
“We think that within a few days we can safely return.”
Militants waging a four-month campaign of sabotage and kidnapping against the world’s eighth largest oil exporter have forced multinationals to close 550,000 barrels a day since Feb. 18, also hitting domestic power generation and refining.
The heavily armed militants, who roam the maze of mangrove-lined creeks in speed boats, have repeatedly threatened more attacks and clashed sporadically with troops since then.
They say their demands are more autonomy over the delta’s huge oil revenue, $1.5bn in compensation from Shell for oil spills and the release of two jailed ethnic Ijaw leaders.
Nigeria’s Minister of State for Petroleum Edmund Daukoru, also in Paris, said he was optimistic the 120,000 barrels per day EA field would be back by the beginning of next week and also hoped the rest would be restored in “about a month”.
Dimieari Von Kemedi, an Ijaw activist, said Shell was wrong to rush back to the oilfield before tensions had eased, and called on MEND to engage in dialogue.
“Any good manager would allow things to calm down before moving back,” he said.
Brinded said he was encouraged by Wednesday’s meeting between President Olusegun Obasanjo and leaders from the area which resolved to draw up an action plan for developing the region within two weeks.
It was boycotted by MEND and other prominent delta activists.
The government has dismissed the militants as “rascals” and oil thieves, but their demands are shared by many in the impoverished region.
Frustration at government neglect has fuelled a cycle of killing, sabotage, extortion and kidnapping against the government and the oil industry, prompting military reprisals in which innocent civilians are frequently killed. – Reuters
Gulf Times Newspaper, 2006

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Aragorn1968 who wrote (19487)4/9/2006 1:51:29 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 37378
 


Re: Ethanol has arrived; Cellulose ethanol stock up 94% and going higher

From the trading desk of: Jeff Siegel
April 9, 2006




Dear reader:

This week I'm heading off to Sin City again for another renewable energy conference. I'll be looking for next-gen technologies in solar, biofuel, geothermal and wind.

I'll also be looking for undiscovered stocks for you to buy. Stuff that'll blow your socks off.

And by the looks of the trading markets and the "chatter" on stock message boards, I would say that I'm not alone in my search for profitable trades and investments in the renewable energy markets.

One of the ethanol stocks on my watch list gained 88% on Friday alone! (see 1st chart below)

In short, renewable energy stocks (ethanol in particular) are headed for a red-hot summer. I think this could be one of the best trading summers since Internet stocks exploded on the scene in the summer of 1998.

Going Green

There are 2 high-profiled ethanol stock IPOs in the pipeline that'll be trading soon:

1) Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings, Inc., a company that produces and markets ethanol announced that it has filed a registration statement with a proposed initial public offering of up to $50 million in common stock.

2) VeraSun Energy Corp., the U.S.'s second largest ethanol producer, plans to go public in an initial offering of stock worth up to $150 million and has applied to list on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol VSE.

I guarantee these stocks will be blockbusters for investors. And I also guarantee they'll bring a lot of investor attention to the renewable energy markets.

However, Aventine and VeraSun aren't where the leverage is in the renewable energy markets.

The leverage will be in smaller, lesser known stocks that'll skyrocket in price at a moment's notice.

We saw a classic example of this on Friday when an ethanol stock that I've been following for weeks went ballistic when it announced it had received a contract deal with the Feds.

Take a look at the chart:



Of course, the first trade initiated in my trading service, The Green Trader, has done exceptionally well too.

It's also an ethanol company, but it's a cellulose ethanol company, something that gives it a substantial advantage over the competition.

In fact, ever since buying this stock on February 23, the ride up has been nothing less than incredible. Take a look:



And here's the deal. The upward move in this cellulose ethanol stock is far from over. Hedge funds to Wall Street brokers are talking about this baby as the next best thing since ESPN and Playboy.

I think she's going to $40 a share.

Take a moment to read my trade report on this emerging ethanol play. You won't be disappointed.

Sincerely,

Jeff Siegel

P.S. A lot of people ask me what's driving the boom in solar and ethanol stocks. I'm not completely naïve to think that a concern for the environment is the driver. It's basic supply and demand and crisis equals opportunity that's driving solar and ethanol stocks.

With that said, here's a headline and the first 2 paragraphs of a recent article that says it all:

World 'cannot meet oil demand'
BY CARL MORTISHED, INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS EDITOR

THE world lacks the means to produce enough oil to meet rising projections of demand for fuel over the next decade, according to Christophe de Margerie, head of exploration for Total and heir presumptive to the leadership of the French energy multinational.

The world is mistakenly focusing on oil reserves when the problem is capacity to produce oil, M de Margerie said in an interview with The Times. Forecasters, such as the International Energy Agency (IEA), have failed to consider the speed at which new resources can be brought into production, he believes.

Regardless if you believe the world is running out of cheap and easy oil, the notion... the perception that we are will drive ethanol stocks to ever-greater highs.

Don't miss out: wealthdailymail.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rocket Red who wrote (19492)4/9/2006 1:55:10 PM
From: Land Shark   of 37378
 
Here's also a nice list of renewable energy stocks:

investorideas.com 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Land Shark who wrote (19493)4/9/2006 1:55:49 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 37378
 
Good pumper too LOL

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Rocket Red who wrote (19494)4/9/2006 2:06:46 PM
From: Land Shark   of 37378
 
Geeze am I crossing the line? LOL

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Land Shark who wrote (19495)4/9/2006 2:09:22 PM
From: Rocket Red   of 37378
 
My mistake I thought the post was on the Mike Shaftner group as in PUMPING LIKE A MAD WHORE HOUSE

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: Crossy who wrote (19448)4/9/2006 5:07:51 PM
From: AuBug   of 37378
 
Precious Metal
By Terry Savage
TheStreet.com Contributor
4/9/2006 9:05 AM EDT
URL: thestreet.com 

If oil is "black gold," is uranium the "new gold"?

It's a question worth asking, even as gold prices are soaring. Gold is the traditional precious-metal hedge against governmental mismanagement of paper currency. That's because every ounce of gold ever mined remains in existence. It never corrodes or decomposes, and can never be created from other materials. That makes gold the perfect alternative to paper money that is created and backed only by government promises.

But you can't use gold to keep you warm in the coldest winter, or keep you cool in the hottest summer. It won't keep the engines of industry running, and it won't provide the electricity to keep your computer humming. For that, we need energy -- an ever-increasing amount of energy, as populations multiply and citizens of China (and India and Vietnam, and more than half of the globe) demand the basics of modern life.

It's all that demand, plus the potential scarcity of fossil fuels, that the world must now consider. No one knows when we will "run out" of oil, or what modern techniques might be invented to squeeze it out of shale or drill more deeply into the earth's core. But since much of the known oil reserves are concentrated in politically and militarily unstable parts of the world, it seems wise to consider Plan B: nuclear energy.

Forget for the moment the politics of nuclear energy and the emotional fears of disaster, and consider the reality of energy demands. One man has been on the forefront of writing about this issue for the past several years. James Dines has labeled himself "the original uranium bug." It's a takeoff on his reputation as "the original goldbug," for which he was known in the 1960s, when gold was trading at $32 an ounce.

Since Dines began writing about uranium and recommending uranium stocks to readers of his newsletter, the price of uranium has soared from $7.10 to over $41, an increase of more than 400%. Dines says this is only the start of the move. In a section of his annual forecast issue, he writes about what he calls the "Coming Great Switch to Uranium":

"Nuclear energy produces zero greenhouse gases, largely comes from deposits in politically stable and friendly countries (Canada, Australia, America), there is enough uranium for a billion years using breeder reactors, soaring prices for fossil fuels has left nuclear power increasingly cheap on a relative basis, and nuclear power could be used to split ordinary water into its components -- oxygen and hydrogen -- to power fuel cells for cars for everybody in the world," he writes.

Dines acknowledges that there is a problem with radioactive waste, and only half-jokingly suggests we blast it into space on a rocket. But he figures we'll come to some solution, noting: "Either that gets solved or we shiver in the dark, so coming generations will have to solve that problem somehow."

In the meantime, Dines has led his subscribers (including this writer) into investments in a variety of companies that either mine uranium or are involved in building reactors around the globe. He points out that the U.S. now gets one-fifth of its electric power from its 103 commercial reactors, and it's the world's largest producer of nuclear-generated energy.

France gets 78% of its power from nuclear, followed by countries such as Lithuania, Slovakia and Belgium, each of which gets nearly two-thirds of its power (though a far smaller aggregate amount) from nuclear energy. And the growth in demand for nuclear fuel is coming from unexpected places, such as Bulgaria, which has announced it will build its seventh nuclear reactor and export energy to Greece, Turkey and other neighbors.

China is at the bottom of the chart of nuclear power generators, only now beginning to build reactors. But just last week, Australia signed a deal with China allowing the export of Australian uranium to the Asian behemoth.

Nuclear power is clearly a political as well as economic issue. President Bush promised aid to India for commercial nuclear technology, even though that country has not signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That concession is designed to keep India from allying with Iran, a current provider of its oil. As part of that deal, the president guaranteed that America will provide uranium for India's needs, without regard to our own shortage of supply.

Where will all this uranium come from? From mining companies in the U.S., Canada and Australia. And, along with the price of uranium itself, the stocks in those companies have already soared. Dines' proprietary index of uranium stock prices is up 1,112% in the past few years. His explanation is that even though there is an abundance of uranium in existence, higher prices and demand will encourage production and profits.

Dines' recommended list includes companies such as Cameco (CCJ) (up 1,839% since he recommended it several years ago) and Fronteer (FRG), as well as Pinetree Capital, Mega Uranium and Laramide Resources, which trade on Canadian exchanges. If demand for uranium continues as predicted, these stocks will become as familiar as JDS Uniphase (JDSU), Cisco (CSCO) and Brocade (BRCD) were in the late 1990s. (And, of course, you recognize the risk inherent in these speculative situations, having learned the lessons of history.)

So, far from recommending uranium stocks as a speculation at this point (though Dines considers this just the beginning of the move), this is a wake-up call to the issue of energy independence that will dominate our future. And I write this column to give Dines some well-deserved credit for his farsighted investment advice, once again. That's The Savage Truth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the time of publication, Savage was long Cameco.

Terry Savage is an expert on personal finance and also appears as a commentator on national television on issues related to investing and the financial markets. Savage's personal finance column by the Chicago Sun-Times is nationally syndicated, and she released her fourth book, The Savage Number: How Much Money Do You Need? in June 2005. Savage also was the first woman trader on the Chicago Board Options Exchange and is a registered investment adviser for stocks and futures. A Phi Beta Kappa graduate of the University of Michigan, Savage currently serves as a director of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Corp. She also has served on the boards of the McDonald's and Pennzoil corporations.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Crossy who wrote (19448)4/9/2006 5:21:16 PM
From: AuBug   of 37378
 
Do you know some history on Craig Lindsay? I only know the bio they posted on the MM.v website. I'm glad to give MM.v a place of honor in my yellowcake stable of soon to be champions :-)

finance.yahoo.com 

I'm dumping WNP.v as Mongolia is politically flaky and although they're a sure thing as far as building a mine they lack the 10-bagger blue sky potential of a junior E&P company. The lawsuit doesn't help either.

Also working on a couple of sleepers.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

From: allevett4/9/2006 5:22:47 PM
   of 37378
 
Chavez Threatens to Expel U.S. Ambassador

By NATALIE OBIKO PEARSON, Associated Press Writer

CARACAS, Venezuela - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said the U.S. ambassador was "provoking the Venezuelan people" and threatened Sunday to expel the American diplomat, whose convoy was chased by pro-government protesters.

"I'm going to throw you out of Venezuela if you continue provoking the Venezuelan people," Chavez said in a nationally televised speech addressed to U.S. Ambassador William Brownfield.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.