Gold/Mining/Energy | ABER RESOURCES


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: Tomato who wrote (1525)7/17/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: .Trev   of 2006
 
Sorry can't help but Teevee did publish a three way comparison recently somewhere. so he can probably give you what you want.

Cheers

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: .Trev who wrote (1526)7/18/1999 12:02:00 AM
From: teevee   of 2006
 
.Trev,

Message 10401781

regards,
teevee

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: teevee who wrote (1527)7/18/1999 1:34:00 PM
From: bill   of 2006
 
Sold the last of my trading shares at 13.60. Made my decision
on the basis of virtually no volume going into WSP's press
release. Now, I'm expecting a drop back to 13.00 to fill the
gap. A good decision? A bad decision? Does anyone think that
ABZ's recent runup is tied to the WSP results? Or, is something
else moving the stock price?

Opinions are all over the place with regard to WSP share price with those normally optomisitic
continuing to be optomisitic and those who are normally pessimistic
continuing to be pessimistic.

If ABZ's current run up was the result, once again, of some company
taking a position, will the current price drop back once the
targeted amount of shares is accumulated? This happened last time
with a substantial drop in price once the major buyer had met its
target. If this were the case, I'd expect a pull back to around
eleven dollars with a move back up to around 12 and then consolidation of a new base.

Anyone with me on this? Or have I wandered completely off on my
own. IF and this is a big IF, I were right, then there would be
another great buying opportunity with another chance to take
substantial trading profits.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: bill who wrote (1528)7/18/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: bill   of 2006
 
I meant to add that the reason I see the price
consolidating at a higher level is because as large
corporations buy, they are reducing the public float.
The day traders and momentum players move the upper edge
of the price
up in the short term but once the major buying is done
there are not enough day traders to maintain the price
and, once it begins to slide, they'll short it, driving
the price below the consolidation level. With momentum
gone, they'll exit and the new price base will form
at a higher level than before the momentum began because
of the smaller number of shares available. Over the
next twelve months, I'd expect to see this scenario
repeated a number of times.

At the moment I've got two brokerage predictions--
17.50 and 30.00. Big spread between them. Take over
price--40.00 for a premium of 10.00 on the 30.
Be interesting to see what happens if the price
approaches 26.00. If anyone remembers that far back,
the stock hit 28.00, then there was a large European
financing at 26.00. Those investors, if they haven't
sold and taken a large loss, will be watching the
price gradually climb. At some time they were convinced
that
26.00 was a favorable price. If that was true, we should
see a lot of upside. It it was wrong, we could see
price stopped cold in its tracks because of a massive
overhang at the 26.00 Canadian level.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: bill who wrote (1529)7/18/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: .Trev   of 2006
 
On a different slant but still speaking of Large Corporations buying I just noticed a piece in Friday's Vancouver Sun which might explain why RTP has been showing strength for some time.

Ostensibly it relates to iron ore and coal production in Australia where BHP and Rio Tinto are both significant operators. I recall that a little known facet of Rio Tinto makes them about No 3 in the USA for coal production also. How does this affect your up coming diamond mine in the Territories I hear you say.

Well both iron ore and coal have been suffering in Australia and BHP has been in sore straits for about a year or more, with the implication that EKATI as a valuable asset might be in play i.e. for sale. Rio Tinto is of course the Diavik muscle.

The latest word is that the two of them might now be into merger talks. So far it's just speculation but it sure could change the complexion of things in the diamond industry as well as Iron and Coal. The trouble with the information age is that there is just so much information available globally that it's tough to keep track and keep up to date with the reading.

Lorne if you're there remember what I said last week.

Cheers

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: .Trev who wrote (1530)7/19/1999 1:27:00 AM
From: bill   of 2006
 
If they do merge, what effect do you predict on ABZ? There is
obviously something going on. DMM did not start to move up
until the project was further along--if I remember correctly.
I'm suspicious about the major gold companies. Certainly, in the
short term, the writing is on the wall for them. They are going
to have to diversify. They are naturals for something like
diamonds. With SA gold mines shutting down, African base metals
unmineable because of endless conflicts, the former USSR being
a quagmire where any company can sink into oblivion, etc.,
a producing, profitable diamond mine looks like one hell of an
asset.I doubt if Barric or Placer or RTZ or BHP are going to
go the dot com route.

Asia is improving but, as always, there may be some exaggeration.
The American press seems incapable of reporting without hype and
exaggeration.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: bill who wrote (1531)7/19/1999 8:33:00 AM
From: don jackson   of 2006
 
Aber and Tiffany create unique North American diamond industry alliance


VANCOUVER, July 19 /CNW/ - Aber Resources Ltd. (TSE-ABZ, NASDAQ-ABERF)
and Tiffany & Co. (NYSE-TIF) have created a unique North American diamond
industry alliance through a joint arrangement and an equity investment by
Tiffany in Aber. The agreement governs the sale of a substantial portion of
the value of Aber's 40% share of the anticipated production of the Diavik
Diamond Project in Canada's Northwest Territories.
Tiffany & Co. will purchase 8 million treasury shares of Aber for a total
of Cdn.$104 million ($13 per share). Aber will then have 53,827,883 shares
outstanding, (56,072,883 fully diluted), with Tiffany & Co. holding 14.3% on a
fully diluted basis. Mr. James Fernandez, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Tiffany will be appointed to the Board of Directors of
Aber immediately following the Annual General Meeting on July 30, 1999.
Tiffany & Co. is the world leader in sales of high quality diamond
jewelry. It has a pre-eminent position in the American retail diamond
jewellery market, the dominant diamond market of the world, and has been very
successful in expanding this brand recognition internationally.
Aber Resources Ltd. is the Canadian based 40% owner of the Diavik
Diamonds Project. The 60% owner, and operator, is Diavik Diamond Mines Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc of London, England.
With the completion of this transaction, Aber will have Cdn.$214 million
of working capital and anticipates raising the balance of its share of the
capital cost of the project without equity financing. The project is now in
the final phases of government approvals with construction expected to
commence early in 2000 subject to receipt of final permits and approval of the
boards of both Aber and Rio Tinto.
Aber will supply a proportion of all sizes of diamonds in the customary
high qualities demanded by Tiffany. The arrangement channels rough diamond
production directly from the mine to the retailer without affecting the rough
diamond market.
The commercial arrangement will allow both companies to share in the
financial benefits of a segment of the diamond trade not normally accessible
to either a mine producer or a diamond jewellery retailer.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (3)

To: don jackson who wrote (1532)7/19/1999 9:59:00 AM
From: Sudhir Khanna   of 2006
 
This is a great step forward for Aber and the type of innovative thinking needed by other Canadian players.

Sudhir

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: Sudhir Khanna who wrote (1533)7/19/1999 10:10:00 AM
From: bill   of 2006
 
Well, there's the answer to my question. Talk about
an unexpected but welcome announcement. glad I kept
my core position.Looks like ABZ is going to be a
winner.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: bill who wrote (1534)7/19/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: Lorne   of 2006
 
Bill - It's hard not to gloat to those ABZ naysayers out there. Teevee for instance lectured me at length on how my ABZ was dead and how WSP would be an unbelievable monster. Since then ABZ is up about 45% and WSP is flat, and that's after two bulk results for WSP. That's why promoters and hypesters are our biggest enemy on SI.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.