SI
SI
Advertise on SI

 Biotech / Medical | Amgen Inc. (AMGN)


Previous 10 | Next 10 
To: mopgcw who wrote (1483)5/14/2007 6:15:40 PM
From: tuck   of 1880
 
>>Medicare Proposes Cuts In Anti-Anemia Drugs > AMGN, JNJ
Last update: 5/14/2007 5:54:06 PM

By Jennifer Corbett Dooren
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The U.S. government Monday proposed limiting Medicare payments for the use of anti-anemia drugs by Amgen Inc. (AMGN) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
In a proposed national coverage decision, Medicare said it would only pay for use of the drug under specified conditions to treat anemia in certain cancers. The government said it wouldn't pay for the drugs to prevent anemia and it also said patients needed to have certain hemoglobin levels before it would pay for the use of the drugs.
The drugs at issue are known as erythropoiesis stimulating agents or ESA. Amgen's Aranesp and J&J's Procrit are approved to treat anemia associated with chemotherapy. Aranesp and another Amgen drug, Epogen, also are approved to treat anemia in people with kidney disease. Procrit and Epogen are identical except for the product label; J&J markets Procrit under a license agreement with Amgen.
Medicare said its proposed decision follows a Food and Drug Administration decision in March to add a "black box" warning to the drugs that discusses a variety of safety concerns. The boxed warning also recommends the three drugs should be used at the lowest dose possible to boost red blood cell levels to the lowest level necessary to avoid blood transfusions.
Last week FDA's oncology panel, made up of outside medical experts, said additional restrictions should be added to the drugs' labels. FDA officials said another FDA panel will be convened in the fall to discuss the drugs' use in treating patients with kidney failure.
Medicare's proposal is open until June 13 for a public comment period. The government then has another 60 days to complete its final decision and then would issue a final decision memo by Sept. 14.
-By Jennifer Corbett Dooren, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9294; Jennifer.Corbett@dowjones.com<<

That was quick. The above patent news didn't hurt AMGN much intraday, but it's off on the medicare payments news after hours to about $54. That should do it until the fall panel on dialysis. So if I'm feeling frisky, I buy back my calls tomorrow, and see if CERA doesn't get held up.

Cheers, Tuck

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: tuck who wrote (1484)5/14/2007 10:15:32 PM
From: tom pope   of 1880
 
Wow, and I was kicking myself for bailing out of a small AMGN position this morning at 55.65! The stop loss god was smiling on me.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

From: DewDiligence_on_SI5/14/2007 10:36:18 PM
   of 1880
 
CMS statement on EPO drugs:

cms.hhs.gov 

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: DewDiligence_on_SI who wrote (1486)5/15/2007 8:58:13 AM
From: JGoren   of 1880
 
Amgen is headed to the 40's. Down 3.30 in early trading. Now at 52+

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: tom pope who wrote (1485)5/15/2007 9:11:38 AM
From: manny_velasco   of 1880
 
Care to guess if AMGN will make it to the fire sale thread?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: tom pope who wrote (1485)5/15/2007 9:13:13 AM
From: manny_velasco   of 1880
 
Care to guess if AMGN will make it to the fire sale thread?

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (1)

To: manny_velasco who wrote (1488)5/15/2007 9:14:43 AM
From: tom pope   of 1880
 
I don't think so, it's a pretty heavy piece of equipment. But it's just about half way there. I'll go see whether ML has words of wisdom this time.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: manny_velasco who wrote (1489)5/15/2007 9:19:51 AM
From: tom pope   of 1880
 
Here we go, Merrill, looking for something positive in the carnage:


Proposals Would Hurt Remaining US Aranesp Ca Sales 72%:
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services is proposing national coverage reimburse.
changes for EPO agents (ESAs) in anemia assoc with cancer. The proposed changes were
posted earlier and are much more restrictive than expected based on last week’s ODAC
panel. But, we believe the proposals are likely to be modified significantly before being
adopted by CMS. If implemented as proposed, remaining US Aranesp sales in oncology
could decline by 72% and 2008 EPS by $0.60. While we are maintaining our projections
until we gain visibility regarding final changes, we est a risk-adjusted fair value of $52-$53.

More Restrictive Than Expected:
The reimbursement proposals exclude patients with MDS, only allows initiation of therapy if
hemoglobin (Hb) is < 9 g/dL for a large majority of patients with cancers that express EPO
receptors, limits the ESA dose that can be used each month, and eliminates use for patients
receiving certain other expensive biologics, such as Avastin and Erbitux.

Unlikely to be Adopted as Proposed:
Because the proposals do not appear to be based on sound scientific rationale, we believe the
extremely restrictive proposals are derived from a political agenda to cut payments for ESAs.
Because too many cancer patients, particularly those without access to transfusions, would be
denied an important therapy, we do not expect the proposal to be adopted as written.

Likely Changes to Proposal:
We believe the proposals will be changed based on comments received during the 30-day
comment period. We do not expect patients will be denied coverage based on a theoretical
concern about EPO-receptors being present on 90% of tumors. However, we do believe
that Medicare will implement a minimum Hb requirement for initiation of ESA therapy,
particularly for patients w/o symptoms.

Worst Case & Most Likely Scenarios:
If the proposals are implemented as written we believe remaining US Aranesp sales in
cancer could decline by 72% & 2008 EPS could decrease by $0.60. The more likely
scenario is that the Hb level needed for initiation of therapy will be set at 9 - 10 g/dL. Also,
breast and head & neck cancer patients could be denied coverage based on studies that
suggest ESAs hurt these patients.

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read | Read Replies (2)

To: tom pope who wrote (1491)5/15/2007 9:38:55 AM
From: tuck   of 1880
 
I agree with Merrill's take here, FWIW. No one has found EPO receptors on cancers. The panel was talking about restricting initiation of treatment to patients below 10 Hb. The one that could stick is the breast and H&N cancer patients, and that will indeed hurt some more. Add those into the most likely scenario and you get around 50% of cancer sales at risk at risk.

Some of the studies in which they got decreased survival signals may have had design flaws as far as those signals are concerned, such as balance of patient populations between arms.

Buying back my sold May 57.5 calls for 5 cents. Maybe AMGN will finally get lucky with CERA getting delayed this week.

Cheers, Tuck

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read

To: tom pope who wrote (1491)5/15/2007 10:06:13 AM
From: tuck   of 1880
 
Notable calls summarizes Citi and GS' takes:

notablecalls.blogspot.com 

Cheers, Tuck

Share Recommend | Keep | Reply | Mark as Last Read
Previous 10 | Next 10 

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.