SI
SI
discoversearch

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 51.44-2.1%5:20 PM EDTNews

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Bill Wolf1/2/2018 4:44:52 PM
2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Lance Bredvold
slacker711

  Read Replies (1) of 145486
 
Thoughts on the TCL v. Ericsson FRAND Decision

Thomas F. Cotter



Contact Information Briggs and Morgan Professor of Law
University of Minnesota Law School
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis MN 55446
(612) 624-7527
cotte034@umn.edu


As noted last week, just before Christmas U.S. District Judge James Selna released the public redacted version of his memorandum of findings of fact and conclusions of law in TCL Communication Technology Holdings, Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Case No. SACV 14-341 JVS (DFMx) (available in three parts: part 1, part 2, and part 3). Professor Jorge Contreras has already published a thorough post on the decision on Patently-O, and Richard Vary of Bird & Bird recently published an analysis as well (here). I don't see much point in my repeating what they've already said, but I will note a few things that made a particular impression on me.


@ link....

comparativepatentremedies.blogspot.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

Copyright © 1995-2018 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.