That does seem to be the case: <Really... So you are the "expert" on climate science?? > So far, my theories [from the mid 1980s] seem to be right much more so than do those of the official "scientists". How about my 2008 sunspot predictions? Right on the money.
Individually they are far more knowledgeable on particular things. For example an ocean current expert would know vastly more than me on ocean currents. But they go wrong on premises - such as "Earth is in balance". With false premises, they can't get the rest right. They think of CO2 as pollution - ipso facto a bad thing, failing to appreciate the advantages of more CO2.
They say how terrible the costs of slight [not even 1 degree so far] of Global Warmig, but ignore the benefits of heat and CO2.
Tellng me I'm a joke is not a persuasive argument. It simply makes me think you are unable to understand things. Yes I hold a higher moral ground. Some people simply have higher morals than others. People indulging some of the seven cardinal sins [as Global Doomsters do] are lower on the moral relativity scale. They are strong on greed, pride and envy, not to mention gluttony and sloth. Heck, they are even prone to wrathful murder, threatening death to those who oppose them. Lust comes in when they go on their jamborees away from home and probably closer to home too, working late in the CO2 discussions - think Al Gore with his second chakra... what a joke he is. wrath, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and gluttony.
Watch for my 2020 foresight 2020 Big Chill prediction too.
Mqurice |
