Politics : Politics of Energy


 Public Reply | Prvt Reply | Mark as Last Read | FilePrevious 10 | Next 10 | Previous | Next  
To: russet who wrote (32739)6/26/2012 11:35:33 AM
From: LLCFRead Replies (1) of 39823
 
<Don't have to prove anything jackarse,...>

Oh, coulda sworn you just said there were no papers on AGW you couldn't show caused only local effect....now you're not even willing to post any? huh!?

"There isn't one paper on AGW that has proven man is causing anything but a local effect."

Message 28227701

Normally when one makes a claim they would prooooobably want to be able to at least attempt to back it it...

Guess you were just caught up in the moment... :) It kind a looks like you don't know WHAT studies the AGW backers use, have you read ANY of them???

<you the one telling me I should change my ways based on falsified studies . >

Huh!? Must be confusing me with someone else... or blinded by your emotionality. :)
But... why don't you show us all where I tried to change your mind with falsified studies??

<Now you tell us you have read nothing>

Ummm, yea.. which:

1.) is pretty much what you have shown us about your claims.... have you read ANY of the major AGW studies???

2.) Is a strange admission from someone you claim is trying to change your mind on AGW with "falsified studies"???

Feel free to prove me wrong... I have no dog in this hunt... but I hear a lot of yelping!

<Hello Mr. moderator,...you clearly are not moderating anything.>

Right... lots of name calling AND a falst claim going on in your post. :)

DAK
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public Reply | Prvt Reply | Mark as Last Read | FilePrevious 10 | Next 10 | Previous | Next  

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.