Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)


 Public Reply | Prvt Reply | Mark as Last Read | FilePrevious 10 | Next 10 | Previous | Next  
To: pgerassi who wrote (263325)3/12/2010 7:59:12 PM
From: eracerRead Replies (2) of 272312
 
Re: No matter what they are, look for Intel to force the list to include more Core iX friendly ones and reduce those K8, K10 and BD friendly ones.

Psst. It's 2010. No one cares about K8 any more, or 65-nm K10 for that matter. Spare us the completely unfounded "big mean Intel is forcing them to make Core iX look good" garbage.

And to catch up on old times:

siliconinvestor.com

I suggest we wait until April 2010 and see who is right, unless someone leaks the specs beforehand.

I was right. 890GX is nothing but the same old 40 shader processor/785G-with-higher-clocks-and-barely-better-than-the-old-790GX graphics. No 80 shader processor core as you insisted.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public Reply | Prvt Reply | Mark as Last Read | FilePrevious 10 | Next 10 | Previous | Next  

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.