SI
SI
discoversearch

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (7649)4/13/2005 1:21:56 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) of 12216
 
Re: 4/6/05 - [MTXX] Radacosky vs. John Doe

Thanks in part to the efforts of The Truthseeker here on SI, the danger of anosmia (loss of smell) from Matrixx's Zicam Cold Remedy nasal gel has been revealed. This has led to print and TV exposés about the product which in turn have resulted in numerous lawsuits against Matrixx. Matrixx has chosen to fight back with lawsuits of their own against critics.

The referenced post talks about one such vocal critic who Matrixx sued: Dan Radacosky, who goes under the name painfullyblunt2004 on Yahoo. As it turns out, Radacosky is an attorney whose Arizona based firm represents Zicam "victims."
This Zicam® Litigation Informational Web Site is a joint venture between the The Radacosky Law Firm, P.L.C. of Phoenix, Arizona and Peterson Reed & Warlaumont, L.L.C. of Salt Lake City, Utah. Our two firms have joined forces to more effectively represent victims who have been injured through their use of Zicam® Cold Remedy nasal gel or like products.
zicamcases.com

Matrixx's Motion for Release against Radacosky in Maricopa County Court was denied and painfullyblunt2004 still actively posts on the Yahoo Matrixx board. As one might expect, he hasn't exactly endeared himself to the longs who, as one also might expect, have also accused him of shorting the stock. But, as one might not expect, Radacosky got so pissed at his accusers, he sued one of them, a guy who posts under the alias "Veribull."

=====

Case Information

Case Number: CV2005-005820
Judge: Schneider
Case Type: Civil
File Date: 4/6/2005
Location: Downtown

Party Information
Party Name - Rel - Sex - Attorney
Daniel J Radacosky - Plaintiff - Male - Pro Per
John Doe - Defendant - Male - Pro Per

Case Documents
Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
4/6/2005 COM - Complaint/Petition 4/7/2005 Plaintiff(1)
4/6/2005 CCN - Cert Arbitration - Not Subject 4/7/2005 Plaintiff(1)

Case Calendar
There are no calendar events on file

Judgments
There are no judgments on file

superiorcourt.maricopa.gov 5-005820

=====

Here is a sampling of posts on the Yahoo! MTXX board:


PB04's CREW = SHORTS
by: veribull 04/04/05 06:20 pm
Msg: 111510 of 111801

a walking quacking DUCK that's FU@KED !!!

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111508 by veribull

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Notice how many mice we have.
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/04/05 09:29 pm
Msg: 111514 of 111801

Given the chance to be men or mice, they chose to be mice. Funny how you bigmouths make lots of accusations until you can't dance around a direct question any more. Cowards--the entire Matrixx Pump Squad--lying, pathetic cowards.

finance.messages.yahoo.com


=====

Notice how many mice we have.
by: veribull 04/05/05 10:22 am
Msg: 111533 of 111801

Notice how many SNAKES we have - your wife did...

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111523 by painfullyblunt2004

=====

My minions, my mice . . .
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/05/05 11:23 am
Msg: 111539 of 111801

. . . where is your litany of accusations? Where is your indictment of lies? Funny how the cowardly mice scatter. C'mon, certainly someone else wants to join fullofbull as a defendant.

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: Notice how many mice we have.
by: veribull 04/05/05 11:41 am
Msg: 111541 of 111801

>>>fullofbull will be hiding in a ditch somewhere hoping to avoid the process server<<

You don't even address with the correct alias - you're a JOKE !!! You may scare some on this board... You are too easy to find including all of the details - you have no clue who you are dealing with now...

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111538 by painfullyblunt2004

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: My minions, my mice . . .
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/06/05 02:14 am
Msg: 111576 of 111801

<<< You now post open messages threatening legal action 24/7 >>>

[Aside from the obvious exaggeration] Only against those who post false and defamatory things about me. Sorry, no free passes for the Matrixx Pump Squad.

But you have to admit, it certainly is interesting how the "accusations" have suddenly stopped [except for fullofbull]. I guess no one wants to join him as a defendant in a defamation case. It's funny how the liar and coward subsections of humanity intersect so much.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111545 by wiredre2000

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: PB04 brushing up on courtroom skills
by: mtxxshortsrfools 04/06/05 11:25 am
Msg: 111602 of 111863

>>So are you accusing me of stock manipulation?
[Watch him squirm, equivocate, and double-talk his way to not answering that question directly.]

I'm accusing you of being a spineless ass.

Your false threats scare no one.

Remember? You've told us numerous times that no one looks at this board, that a post here wouldn't influence the stock price. So, what makes you think that YOU could possibly be damaged?

You are a total ass. Get a life, whoever you are.

Oh, BTW, yes, I believe that by being on this board, you have an effect on the price, as does everyone else. Your affect, however, I believe is calculated. And I believe, the only reason you are here, is to harm the company. JMHO.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111601 by painfullyblunt2004

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

fullofbull consulting his lawyer?
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/06/05 11:41 am
Msg: 111605 of 111863

Gee, fullofbull, you don't seem to be running at the mouth anymore. What's the matter? Consult your lawyer and find out that you're toast?

We're going to find how the shoe fits on the other foot. And I'm going to enjoy every minute of it. Oh, that's right--I don't have any idea "who I'm dealing with." lol

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: fullofbull consulting his lawyer?
by: veribull 04/06/05 12:25 pm
Msg: 111610 of 111863

>>Consult your lawyer and find out that you're toast?<<

I have and the media / press - both are ready for "it"

Besides that, we will be in AZ in May - planning to shoot low... I always like the PGA West - other than that the track are private. You and/or Todd wouldn't be allowed...

We'll talk "toast" ...

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111605 by painfullyblunt2004

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: fullofbull consulting his lawyer?
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/06/05 12:31 pm
Msg: 111611 of 111863

Good. Why don't you have your lawyer contact me? We can arrange for acceptance of service (so you don't have to duck the process server) and get down to the nitty gritty right away. We can even arrange your deposition for May, while you're here. Let's get this thing moving, fullofbull. I'm ready to rock!

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111610 by veribull

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: fullofbull consulting his lawyer?
by: veribull 04/06/05 12:39 pm
Msg: 111612 of 111863

Good - You follow your process putz - don't assume there will be any "ducking" on my side... ... you however may want to practice..

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111611 by painfullyblunt2004

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: fullofbull consulting his lawyer?
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/06/05 12:45 pm
Msg: 111613 of 111863

Sounds to me like you're ducking already. C'mon, come face the music. Show your fellow pumpers that you're not full of shit. I'm trying to make this easy on you. Quit your cowering and let's get on with it.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111612 by veribull

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: VERIBULL = LITTLE BITCH
by: turkeytrap 04/06/05 04:55 pm
Msg: 111635 of 111863

Veribull, the Yahoo lawyer will never sue you. If the Yahoo Lawyer did, you would have gotten notified by Yahoo in a email of a subpoena for your information.

If you do get notification please let me know so I can help you.

Its lucky for the bashers that Matrixx has not sued anyone for deflamation on this board.

They have higher standards.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111633 by veribull

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

veribull gets sued!!!
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/06/05 04:59 pm
Msg: 111638 of 111863

fullofbull is now officially a defendant in a defamation suit. Don't spend all my money golfing, fullofbull. I don't want to have to execute a judgment on your golf clubs.

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

wow 18 recommends
by: mindfaak (M/onster d/ck) 04/06/05 10:42 pm
Msg: 111648 of 111863

as of the time of this posting.

looks as if many longs are happy to see veridull get F@CKED too. He sure is an annoying mofo. It would be nice to see award_vlad get his titties in the wringer too. Any chance you guys can work that out too? ;>)

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111644 by yagottaluvitt

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: Duck and cover
by: mtxxshortsrfools 04/07/05 02:34 am
Msg: 111658 of 111863

>>Oh, great. Another cutting edge lawsuit. How much you want to be that we are all going to be called as witnesses in PB04 v. Veribull? Can a sheepdog be compelled to testify? Will the microchip set off the court metal detector?What are the damages of being "defamed" by Veribull? Seems like the damages could be related to Veribull's credibility on this board. Remember the maxim of equity: the law does not deal with trifles?<<

I'd love to hear the "damages" argument. By the way, PB04, does this mean that you admit you're Dan Radacosky? I haven't heard you say that yet. . .

Who, what and how did veribull damage?

Veribull, please let us know if you're ever served. I have a feeling you might have several sympathetic witnesses on this board.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111655 by kasha_the_dog

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Sympathetic Witnesses
by: funmoney99 04/07/05 08:44 am
Msg: 111660 of 111863

Who on this board plans to be a sympathetic witness for the sexist racist Veribull? ANYone?

FM99

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111658 by mtxxshortsrfools

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

mtxxshortsrfools
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/07/05 05:58 pm
Msg: 111704 of 111863

You're next.

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: mtxxshortsrfools
by: mtxxshortsrfools 04/08/05 10:40 am
Msg: 111734 of 111863

>>You're next.

I assume that's a threat. If you believe that I have ever defamed you, tell us all how I've done that. By the way, you might even tell us who I've defamed!

I've asked numerous questions of you that you've failed to answer, and you could have easily diffused the antagonism against you by answering honestly, as I have done numerous times.

I don't believe you've answered any of them. You've never even said who you are; however, it is pretty clear now that you must be Dan Radacosky, an attorney with a product liability suit against MTXX, and who recently filed a John Doe suit in Maricopa County Superior Court.

Regarding your juvenile attempt to throw your weight around (your "defamation" suit against Veribull--whoever that is). I can tell you that anyone reading your posts will clearly see that you have not been damaged beyond the damage YOU'VE inflicted to your reputation (assuming that you ARE Dan Radacosky).

Veribull's rantings were hardly believable, and you're childish goading, I believe, will result in your admonishment by any judge who spends any time looking at your posts.

If you're not threatening to file a defamation suit against ME. Tell me now.

If your threat is real,

MAKE MY DAY. . .

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111704 by painfullyblunt2004

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

A Veribull Fund
by: turkeytrap 04/08/05 05:02 pm
Msg: 111759 of 111863

Its time we band together to help out Veribull. I have done some looking around and to my surprise a deflamation suit can cost over $100,000+ to defend.

I for one would be the first to donate money for his cause.

Arizona basicly has no SLAPP suit laws and a defendand can go through extreme pain defending one.

Let me know what you guys think.

A 5 to 10 thousand dollar donation could help Veribull out of this mess.

IUSA, Matrixxshortrfools, Kasha and others. Lets here what you have to say and how much you are willing to help out.

Turkey

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

Re: mtxxshortsrfools
by: painfullyblunt2004 04/09/05 02:34 am
Msg: 111781 of 111863

<<< I assume that's a threat. >>>

No, it's a promise.

<<< If you believe that I have ever defamed you, tell us all how I've done that. >>>

Perhaps you might want to go back and review your own posts. Better yet, perhaps you should have exercised a little better discretion BEFORE you posted.

<<< I've asked numerous questions of you that you've failed to answer, and you could have easily diffused the antagonism against you by answering honestly, as I have done numerous times. >>>

As YOU have done numerous times??????? Surely you jest. Furthermore, I don't have to answer ANYTHING you ask. If you don't like it, too bad. I generally ignore inane questions--hence why I typically ignore yours.

And why is it my job to diffuse "antagonism" you cause? Maybe the easiest way to "diffuse antagonism" (I'm not even sure what that means exactly) is for you not to cause it in the first place.

<<< I can tell you that anyone reading your posts will clearly see that you have not been damaged beyond the damage YOU'VE inflicted to your reputation >>>

You should never chime in on things you don't understand, and you clearly don't understand this area. Second, why do you care what happens to fullofbull? He made his own bed. You made yours.

<<< Veribull's rantings were hardly believable >>>

You've got to admit, folks, this is an entertaining argument. Apparently, foolofbull believes the best way to come to fullofbull's defense is to argue that nobody believes ANYTHING he says. I'm sure he appreciates your very helpful comments.

<<< If you're not threatening to file a defamation suit against ME. Tell me now. >>>

Why? And I would do what you tell me . . . uh . . . um . . . why was that again?

<<< MAKE MY DAY. . . >>>

Is that supposed to be your tough-guy, Clint Eastwood impersonation? It's REALLY intimidating. Don't do that, okay? You're going to frighten me.

Posted as a reply to: Msg 111734 by mtxxshortsrfools

finance.messages.yahoo.com

=====

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

Copyright © 1995-2017 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.