First, the board members that weren't officers only received 550,000 shares not 1.5 million. Secondly, they were voted that many shares by the shareholders. Ever heard of comparing apples and oranges?
You just don't get it. And I am losing faith that you ever will. You are practically working for a groups of people who are the lowest form of dirtballs out there. And while this company is under their and your attack the stock price will never match the value of the company. Hence the term undervalued.
Are you now going to try to tell me that you have never heard the term undervalued?