Non-Tech : 100-BAGGERS

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (124)6/2/1996 10:46:00 PM
From: Mark Hill   of 507
Dear Emile,

I am puzzled by your comments regarding Warp 10. It seems that you have access to some additional information that we do not have. You question the credibility of Warp's technology and network. Don't you think that Newbridge Networks Corporation (NN) would have checked out Warp before entering into a marketing and sales agreement? Or are you also questioning the validity of NN? Newbridge is dealing with some very big players in the telecommunications industry (i.e., Pacific Bell). It certainly wouldn't help NN to have aligned themselves with some slipshod company when they are marketing their Vivid ATM switches and Warp's technology to these companies..... And what about the deal with Ancor Communications? Are you questioning their legitimacy as well? Why not just question the existence of all Canadian companies while you are at it?n short, I question the premise of your whole hypothesis. May I suggest that you do some further research before trying to undermine a company. It seems that you have an ulterior motive for spreading these rumors.... Maybe you have some ax to grind with Geist. It sounds like maybe you didn't do you homework the last time on TPIF and actually got burned. Or maybe you have a stake in another company like Fore that would be pushed by the wayside if Warp's is successful.


P.S. I have no other interest in this company than a minor holding.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

Copyright © 1995-2018 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.Stock quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes - See Terms of Use.