Profile for CrazyPete
Add PeopleMarkIgnore MemberSend Private MessageRecent Posts

Site Participation
Date Joined Sep 27 2004 User Level
Posts 190 Boards Moderated0
PeopleMarks 3 Bans Issued 0
Ignored By 0 Bans Received 0

Personal Information
25 Most Recent SubjectsLast PostPosts
Biotech Valuation01-08-13 11:36 PM 91
2011 Biotech Charity Contest 10-07-11 01:22 PM 2
Sequenom, Inc. (SQNM)03-22-11 03:12 PM 1
SCO Group (SCOX)02-13-10 03:49 AM 5
Perlegen 01-07-10 04:43 PM 1
biotech firesales04-30-09 01:32 PM 1
Illumina (ILMN) Optics for Genomics10-23-08 03:21 AM 1
ASML Holding NV02-12-08 01:17 PM 4
Paired Trades and Hedging Strategies 09-12-07 01:52 PM 5
VMware, Inc. (VMW) 08-14-07 10:27 AM 1
CuraGen (CRGN)03-30-07 04:22 PM 2
Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)03-14-07 03:02 PM 20
Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders10-11-06 11:24 PM 2
Value Investing08-22-06 02:06 PM 20
Sepracor-Looks very promising06-22-06 10:19 PM 18
momo-T/FIF03-14-06 04:43 PM 3
Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN)09-30-05 03:01 AM 1
Ligand (LGND) Breakout!09-12-05 10:11 PM 6
Kosan BioSciences -- KOSN08-15-05 12:45 PM 1
Berkshire Hathaway Class B07-15-05 05:18 PM 1
Cell Therapeutics (CTIC)03-08-05 12:42 AM 4
Read Last    Messages  
List Last    Messages  

Posts by CrazyPete
MessageSubjectRecsDate/Time (ET)
[i]The very rich have always been with us. Our Country is perhaps the best aBiotech Valuation 01/08/2013 11:36:44 PM
> I have no reason not to believe my Thermodynamics professor Well, I'm afraiBiotech Valuation 09/22/2012 03:27:05 AM
> It's worth noting that their ROC looks significantly worse when they validatedBiotech Valuation 07/23/2012 11:57:20 PM
The minimum grant you can instruct the fund to make on your behalf is $50. ThBiotech Valuation 07/11/2012 01:09:24 AM
> I have some shares that are more than 10X and so I used a Fidelity Charitable Biotech Valuation 07/10/2012 02:56:02 PM
I don't think there is any suggestion that treatment would be undertaken withoutBiotech Valuation 05/22/2012 11:26:49 AM
I think that is a bogus example. He complains about his tax rate as a % of "taxBiotech Valuation402/18/2012 02:57:00 PM
> Well I happen to be "AA" on rs2075650, so I'm pulling for that particular resuBiotech Valuation 01/24/2012 02:56:52 AM
They did fix some things. It is still a bad paper with serious errors. Biotech Valuation 01/22/2012 03:42:08 AM
Ah well, I'll be racing you to the bottom :( I'm somewhat consoled by the fac2011 Biotech Charity Contest  10/07/2011 01:22:24 PM
So, if 86% of unnecessary tests and prescriptions were for brand name statins, tBiotech Valuation 10/03/2011 05:43:13 PM
> Gist of the article is more retractions which are taking longer to get resolvBiotech Valuation208/11/2011 11:50:34 AM
Gosh. A couple hundred retractions per year, in all of science? I can't accessBiotech Valuation108/11/2011 01:42:41 AM
The 0.005 is because they've split their alpha between 0.045 for the primary endBiotech Valuation 07/08/2011 08:14:13 PM
There should be a bar over the ".4", i.e. 0.4444... Biotech Valuation 06/22/2011 01:31:35 PM
Does SQNM have any patents that are relevant to a sequencing based assay? I knoSequenom, Inc. (SQNM) 03/22/2011 03:12:58 PM
<pre> ARIA 20% MNTA 20% GNOM 20% PACB 15% ILM2011 Biotech Charity Contest  01/02/2011 03:11:30 PM
Ah well, it seems clear that rational argument is impossible. A Toyota Prius Biotech Valuation312/04/2010 03:36:46 AM
Sounds like a good start. Biotech Valuation112/03/2010 05:04:32 PM
<i>I have no reason to believe a professor lied, and I know the thermal efficienBiotech Valuation212/03/2010 02:28:06 AM
Actually, "specificity" is defined as 1 - the false positive rate. So a specifiBiotech Valuation209/30/2010 01:33:58 AM
I haven't seen the paper. But I would agree that a subgroup analysis can rule oBiotech Valuation207/29/2010 01:47:40 AM
I doubt that Daniel saw my posts here; I think he would have said so if he did. Biotech Valuation1207/12/2010 03:13:44 PM
If I could, I probably wouldn't be hanging around here. Biotech Valuation 07/07/2010 03:59:46 PM
That was quick. Biotech Valuation 07/07/2010 12:52:46 PM
[duplicate post] Biotech Valuation 07/07/2010 12:47:31 PM
The QC they describe is for samples (call rate, IBD analysis, double enrollment,Biotech Valuation107/04/2010 12:20:32 PM
The findings are certainly intriguing. I don't thBiotech Valuation107/03/2010 02:24:08 PM
Actually you're wrong on both counts: the study isBiotech Valuation 07/03/2010 01:31:15 PM
This study is 99% bogus. I'm not sure I'd dismiss the one SNP they found in APOBiotech Valuation107/02/2010 09:23:41 PM
Well, the point of doing randomized clinical trials is that in general it is impBiotech Valuation 06/01/2010 10:53:33 PM
Gosh, what ever happened to the "new normal"? Biotech Valuation 03/28/2010 01:07:55 PM
Good luck with that. I'm still sitting on a 96+% profit on my short. I have toSCO Group (SCOX) 02/13/2010 03:49:57 AM
Perlegen Ceases Operations http://www.genomeweb.com/dxpgx/perlegen-ceases-opePerlegen  01/07/2010 04:43:19 PM
Was there something in particular that stuck out to you? Seems like par for tBiotech Valuation312/04/2009 02:11:32 PM
> a charge of $535 fr "surgery" appears on the insurance statement Silly you,Biotech Valuation111/20/2009 01:29:25 PM
TIPS are simpler to handle in tax advantaged accounts. Biotech Valuation108/07/2009 10:35:04 PM
Here is another new player: http://www.trugenetics.com/ If you sign up nowBiotech Valuation 07/17/2009 03:53:12 PM
Clearly, detecting trace fetal RNA/DNA in maternal blood, the key issues are senbiotech firesales 04/30/2009 01:32:06 PM
In the NY Times article, Dr Kraft is paraphrased as saying "any estimate of highBiotech Valuation 04/16/2009 02:07:03 AM
But you don't get 1% of the gains either, right? Biotech Valuation 02/26/2009 11:36:16 PM
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v27/n1/pdf/nbt0109-3.pdf Biotech Valuation 01/16/2009 02:21:09 AM
The question is whether the whole is more than the sum of the parts. If you havBiotech Valuation 01/09/2009 12:52:36 AM
Only the biomarker analysis. You can't easily interpret the P values they quoteBiotech Valuation101/08/2009 08:46:15 PM
This is what I'd found: http://www.pgxhealth.com/news/pdf/VZ%20APA%20poster%2Biotech Valuation 01/08/2009 12:51:09 PM
> The impressive part of their .001 result was this was done without the benefitBiotech Valuation101/08/2009 01:22:46 AM
So, what is the current Q ratio? Is it 0.7, as this article says? Or is itBiotech Valuation 12/10/2008 11:31:50 PM
You're right, it isn't the inflation factor. It's just that the price on the seBiotech Valuation 11/19/2008 02:51:22 AM
According to Fidelity, the inflation factor for that bond is 1.03566; that is suBiotech Valuation111/18/2008 11:38:10 PM
There have been many recent discussions on the Bogleheads forums about TIPS: [urBiotech Valuation 11/03/2008 03:15:52 PM

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.