| Message | Subject | Recs | Date/Time (ET) |
| Give the Germans a break, C2.
At least the Germans didn't declare themselve | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 09/03/2003 03:18:21 PM |
| Well, blowback can have intended consequences. With China it's the bitter taste | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 09/03/2003 12:27:53 PM |
| The Road to Jerusalem leads thru Baghdad. NOT!
Just yet another example of | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 09/03/2003 12:24:24 PM |
| I cannot say that I have been particularly impressed with Dr. Rice's performance | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 09/02/2003 01:44:32 AM |
| <I>Are you really that blind, jcky, or just typing fast? Bush knew exactly where | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/06/2003 12:09:20 PM |
| <I>The public transformation of Secretary Powell himself from "dove" into "hawk" | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/06/2003 11:51:49 AM |
| With all due respect, LB, but Win is on to something here. Stretching the neoco | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/04/2003 10:09:49 AM |
| <I>Your assertion that "Chrisitian fundamentalism, Islamic fundamentalism, Jewis | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/04/2003 01:58:25 AM |
| Hi Michael,
This subject is looking like too hot a potato to handle on this t | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/04/2003 01:56:36 AM |
| I guess if Bush were King Solomon, there wouldn't be a problem. But he isn't... | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/02/2003 11:47:48 PM |
| <I>Do you mean that Bush mentions God when he gives speeches?</I>
No, the men | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/02/2003 11:43:59 PM |
| Was this personal comment really necessary, Hawk? | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/02/2003 11:31:10 AM |
| Very scary, indeed.
This brings up a more sensitive and prosaic question: | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 02/02/2003 11:27:27 AM |
| <I>Is Pollack a part of the war marketing effort? I don't think so. But his thin | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/30/2003 01:08:58 PM |
| <I>Bush's hands are not tied. He is free to invade. Congress has back him with a | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/29/2003 07:46:23 PM |
| <I>If I must choose between looking like a weak aggressor and strong aggressor, | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/29/2003 04:12:33 PM |
| <I>So the US looks aggressive, cruel, weak and decadent all at once -- a big fat | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/29/2003 03:31:24 PM |
| <I>This is admittedly thin gruel given the fact that Saddam by all accounts is n | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/29/2003 03:25:08 PM |
| <I>U.S. allies Israel, Pakistan and India have nuclear arsenals but have not sig | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/28/2003 12:26:10 PM |
| <I>Until you can own up to the unintended consequences of inaction, you have no | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/28/2003 12:02:39 PM |
| <I>So in sum, cutting off Saddam's funding to the PA won't do much in itself.</I | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/24/2003 03:48:58 PM |
| <I>I still like Doran's argument that 9-11 grows out of a civil war but I think | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/24/2003 03:38:45 PM |
| <I>Still, that doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't connected; and based on | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/17/2003 03:06:24 PM |
| <I>Though we can maintain hopes that someday the Arabs will modernize and learn | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/15/2003 05:08:07 PM |
| <I>A lot of what is posted is in the form of single idea criticism of current po | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/15/2003 04:42:30 PM |
| <I>Hey, I wonder if the Whitehouse is looking for another Canadian speech writer | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/15/2003 01:14:55 PM |
| Agreed.
Policy critique is fair game but personal traits is going over the ed | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/15/2003 01:13:04 PM |
| <I>First, because as futile as the Sharon strategy has been, the Palestinian str | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/15/2003 01:02:46 PM |
| <I>Me too. In which case, it wasn't such a dumb strategy for Bush, was it?</I>
| Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/14/2003 12:49:38 PM |
| <I>Bush is also a gambler, which means his mistakes are more likely to be bold m | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/14/2003 12:37:08 PM |
| Since you are talking about "fair" criticism, I submit any topic relating to how | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/13/2003 01:07:20 AM |
| <I>That's a chimera, jcky.</I>
I guess we'll never know for certain. | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/13/2003 12:53:20 AM |
| <I>more crapola</I>
As opposed to the character of this post, whereby, Andrew | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/13/2003 12:50:25 AM |
| There's a good point and a bad point with being so closely tied with Arik. The | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/13/2003 12:37:49 AM |
| <I>Unless there are some real breaks, it will require a strong, visionary leader | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/13/2003 12:16:36 AM |
| <I>I apologize in advance if such appalling cynicism offends people.</I>
No a | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/11/2003 01:24:27 PM |
| That's a real hoot, LB. I can't believe you keep a tally of these things. <smi | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/10/2003 06:01:53 PM |
| Thanks for the article, Nadine. It was very well written and obviously from som | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/10/2003 02:06:00 AM |
| I am just thinking aloud for a minute here, and I wanted to know what your thoug | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/09/2003 04:48:36 PM |
| Hi LB,
I hope you've had a wonderful holiday. It's good to be back.
Any t | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/08/2003 03:44:03 AM |
| <I>Perhaps the Administration is keeping North Korea response 'close to the vest | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/08/2003 03:42:10 AM |
| A very sad ending to a very sad situation. I guess what comes around, goes arou | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/08/2003 03:39:43 AM |
| The Bush administration's pathologic fixation with Iraq and Saddam is beginning | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/08/2003 03:04:13 AM |
| I would be most interested in uncovering the inner thinking of Pyongyang as to w | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/03/2003 11:55:50 AM |
| While there might not be a nefarious plot by the hardliners to integrate both co | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 01/03/2003 11:36:56 AM |
| Excellent point, John.
Attacking the character of, rather than the substance | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 12/31/2002 11:35:16 AM |
| <I>Doughnuts are effective only in obesity. We don't have much of that around he | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 12/13/2002 11:00:23 AM |
| <I>But one thing we can know is that counting on Saddam to be deterrable is taki | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 12/12/2002 12:52:45 PM |
| <I>If they go ahead in spite of warnings, do we take out the plant like Israel t | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 12/12/2002 12:28:26 PM |
| <I>During the air campaign alone, yes. But we cannot know (at least without find | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | | 12/11/2002 01:31:23 PM |
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.
