| Message | Subject | Recs | Date/Time (ET) |
| It looks like the IP xfr from Nok to Q may have been as much about protecting ot | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 2 | 07/31/2008 02:24:06 PM |
| Nicely done, David. While some might quibble with some of the details, you've p | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 07/25/2008 12:14:52 PM |
| ...<i>minority stake to increase leverage is even dumber than normal.</i>
Agr | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 3 | 06/05/2008 10:11:32 AM |
| <i>Nokia is cooked</i>
FWIW, that's my (non-lawyer) impression, exactly.
T | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 4 | 05/03/2008 09:38:14 AM |
| <i>The same logic of construction above must apply, so that whatever Qualcomm is | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 03/20/2008 06:37:35 PM |
| It was rock solid steady in the U.S. today. No volatility at all. :-) | The New QUALCOMM - Coming Into Buy Range | 1 | 02/18/2008 04:27:08 PM |
| Not familiar with ITC procedure specifics, but given that this is an enforcement | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 02/12/2008 07:35:44 PM |
| He probably still has pals at Nokia too. Which raises another thought: A Nokia | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 02/02/2008 03:19:28 PM |
| <i>....market would not like if Nokia does not agree.</i>
Actually, if the pr | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 01/26/2008 09:30:23 AM |
| <i>The trial balloon may be the 'buy' signal for Q shares I've been looking for. | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 01/06/2008 01:11:45 PM |
| deleted - dupe | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 01/06/2008 06:40:59 AM |
| Just a non-lawyer WAG, but in equity disputes, doesn't the judge need to know wh | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 01/05/2008 10:28:26 AM |
| Poor fellow.
Apparently Qualcomm-itis has mutated and spread to Thailand. | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 09/08/2007 09:38:18 AM |
| Another indicator of this is the recent absence of boo bird posts on how far beh | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 07/27/2007 08:56:34 AM |
| How do we know Nokia didn't make their June Q payment? | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 07/25/2007 04:38:27 PM |
| Gee, being pessimistic is no fun.<g> Besides, what do we know of BRCM's percep | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 07/25/2007 08:57:39 AM |
| LOL. That's sure a possibility. But a business negotiation tends to come to a | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 07/25/2007 08:34:05 AM |
| Here's a bit of speculation:
A QCOM/BRCM deal could look something like this: | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | 1 | 07/25/2007 08:05:18 AM |
| Which I'm assuming is why we've yet to see a PR from BRCM hailing the decision | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 07/21/2007 08:51:51 AM |
| They made no mention of their request for a stay. Strategic, or an oversight? | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 07/19/2007 06:29:40 PM |
| Another similar deal with Sprint and Alltel would effectively nullify the ITC ba | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 07/19/2007 05:17:16 PM |
| Re: Bright sides
<i>Under the agreement, Verizon Wireless will make payments | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 07/19/2007 04:50:10 PM |
| Neither does IJ. | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 07/18/2007 11:19:49 AM |
| Indeed the political bandwagon is loading up. With both Schumer and Rangel on b | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 2 | 07/14/2007 07:33:49 AM |
| Re: <i>...I rest my case...</i>
Thank you. | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 2 | 07/13/2007 05:43:19 PM |
| <i>...trying to find a different remedy...</i>
Oh no, not politicos trying to | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 07/11/2007 07:01:15 PM |
| Just restrict the ITC charter to American companies suing <b>FOREIGN</b> compani | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 3 | 07/11/2007 04:13:10 PM |
| That's my worry as well. A royalty free cross license is one thing, $100 millio | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 06/29/2007 06:31:47 PM |
| Qualcomm trial errors pointed out
Broadcom accuses rival of 'litigation mis | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 06/26/2007 07:38:46 AM |
| AT&T hires 2,000 workers for iPhone launch
Carrier prepares for rush at stores | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 06/22/2007 11:24:57 AM |
| deleted | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 06/22/2007 08:08:05 AM |
| TV ads for the iPhone have begun in the Philadelphia area. They're all about th | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 06/21/2007 09:44:48 AM |
| A premium sure, but only on half of the company.
Assuming it's the QCT half, | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 06/17/2007 01:03:22 PM |
| Both Nokia and BRCM obviously know this is a possibility. One question is, Is i | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 06/17/2007 12:22:29 PM |
| <i>BRCM...is under no obligation to license their patents to anyone.</i>
Whic | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 2 | 06/15/2007 12:23:57 PM |
| The "workaround" is probably more of an issue of timing than feasibility. From | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 06/10/2007 02:15:32 PM |
| While a veto seems unlikely, a stay does appear to be likely to allow time for a | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 5 | 06/08/2007 12:00:31 PM |
| The thing about this that bugs me is, how can Q expect to score points if they d | Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) | | 06/07/2007 07:50:06 PM |
| A presidential veto is a remote possibility, imo. The ITC has taken a path that | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 06/07/2007 07:40:06 PM |
| I like the shift in emphasis toward Q's enabling model and away from the royalty | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 06/06/2007 08:23:20 AM |
| <i>Who was the trial lawyer in the recent Santa Ana case?</i>
His name is Joh | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 05/31/2007 04:50:31 PM |
| Will you be surprised if you're ignored by Q <i>and</i> this thread? | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 6 | 05/30/2007 05:59:09 PM |
| Here's Mr. Dulls usual venom...
Federal Jury Finds That Qualcomm Infringes Th | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 05/29/2007 10:00:34 PM |
| It seems just as likely that all they need is more time to properly address BRCM | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 05/26/2007 10:05:03 AM |
| Any chance Lupin's expectations were too high? Does the commission need two mor | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 05/25/2007 04:56:27 PM |
| Lupin did mention last week that there could be a delay. | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 2 | 05/25/2007 04:37:18 PM |
| For those interested, here's a profile of John Allcock (Q's attorney in Santa An | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 1 | 05/24/2007 09:22:05 AM |
| <i>Q has tried to bring the issue back to life by claiming the applicability of | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | 2 | 05/17/2007 11:14:32 AM |
| C2 and/or JGoren,
Would either of you enlighten us nonlegal types as to how/w | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 05/16/2007 09:12:04 PM |
| Uninformed question for the thread:
In Q's whitepaper on its business model, | Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read | | 05/12/2007 01:12:59 PM |
Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.
