 Register |
|
|
| Profile for Sarmad Y. Hermiz |
| Add PeopleMark | Ignore Member | Send Private Message | Recent Posts |
| Posts by Sarmad Y. Hermiz |
| Message | Subject | Recs | Date/Time (ET) |
| what I really like is this. http://sacramento.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stor | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 08/21/2008 05:04:59 PM | |
| >> Anyone have any idea on how much of a risk this is for Intel (or others)or wh | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 1 | 08/15/2008 02:55:06 PM |
| >> total common shares out 6,487.0 6,253.0 5,919.0 5,766.0 5,818.0 Current sh | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 07/24/2008 09:41:32 PM | |
| >> we will push out the start of the next major phase of Fab-4 wafer output incr | Wennerstrom Semi Equipment Analysis | 1 | 07/24/2008 08:26:44 AM |
| >> A mighty difficult thing to do when you have inferior products and higher cos | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/25/2008 01:35:13 PM | |
| >> Or perhaps you just saw them on the same page with O'Melveny. They are quo | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/25/2008 06:28:42 AM | |
| >> There are significant differences from the LePage-3M case. if you have an | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/25/2008 12:08:33 AM | |
| >> O'Melveny is not listed as attorney of record. I was mistaken about that. | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/24/2008 11:10:41 PM | |
| >> I asked you what suit Henri Richard was associated with before he came to wor | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/24/2008 10:54:36 PM | |
| >> what case? did Henri have to do with? I think AMD's suit was filed primari | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/24/2008 02:18:27 PM | |
| >> It may be that the fact of the lawsuit is most important to AMD right now - i | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/24/2008 11:29:55 AM | |
| >> The question is why ? Is AMD hoping for more evidence to surface in the fi | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/24/2008 12:38:44 AM | |
| >> This may eventually end up in front of the Supremes. My lay-person's opini | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/23/2008 11:07:08 PM | |
| Thanks, Gottfried. this paragraph summarizes Intel's position. As far as I know, | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/20/2008 11:46:20 PM | |
| Intel's exports should do well also. The negative view was that US economy slowd | Intel Corporation (INTC) | 06/19/2008 09:26:49 AM | |
| are you competing with muzo ? http://www.ohio.com/news/top_stories/19062919.h | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 06/05/2008 08:28:20 AM | |
| My understanding is that S. Korea's legal system is a travesty. For both victims | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 06/05/2008 12:15:29 AM | |
| >> Is it possibile he is secretly being payed by Intel ... Nah. The idiot bo | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/30/2008 09:54:08 AM | |
| Folks with actual AMD investment are well advised to read the whole article. Pre | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/30/2008 08:22:07 AM | |
| >> Does any one know if there is any progress in the suit? >> Suit: Intel paid | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/29/2008 10:34:54 PM | |
| >> Yet it's common practice for the Intel guys to set up imaginary Intel policie | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/29/2008 10:48:53 AM | |
| >> You are arguing from ignorance. That is an utterly idiotic statement on th | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/29/2008 10:11:12 AM | |
| Dear Pete, re >> Already here. There is Clearspeed from DRC ... In your un | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/23/2008 02:54:40 PM | |
| >> Don't hold your breath... I'm still holding my breath for Torrenza. About | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/23/2008 02:17:12 PM | |
| >> if Intel is so obviously innocent, why hasn't the case been thrown out? Ap | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/23/2008 12:12:08 PM | |
| >> appears to me that they're inventing new economic policy to apply retroactive | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/23/2008 11:32:12 AM | |
| Then why did the EC go for six years without a decision ? The rebate schedule ha | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/23/2008 10:11:31 AM | |
| >> It will give you a good idea about how vulnerable Intel could be in the EU ca | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/23/2008 08:07:30 AM | |
| gb, Thanks. You answered my question. What I understood from it is there were ma | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/22/2008 10:50:27 AM | |
| gb, are able to comment on whether a large OEM such as Dell or HP buys a whole q | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/22/2008 09:58:57 AM | |
| over half the people that AMD wants to compel to testify are outside the US. (I | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 11:21:00 PM | |
| Or, obviously, AMD's suit was aimed at bullying PC makers into giving AMD some g | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 05:30:34 PM | |
| >> LOL... Doesn't quite pass the "rule of reason" standard. In which way ? | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 05:00:34 PM | |
| >> AMD will attempt to divide OEM's demand into contestable and un-contestable | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 03:38:47 PM | |
| >> You haven't provided any justification for your high level of confidence in t | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 01:42:44 PM | |
| I sincerely would like to find a reference to a legal definition of what makes p | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 11:20:10 AM | |
| >> The only thing different in the AMD case, as applies to their rebate allegati | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/21/2008 10:40:39 AM | |
| >> As FPG pointed out, the 3M case. CJ, is this an off day for you ? The cour | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 10:49:35 PM | |
| c'mon fpg. LePage was not about pricing or cost formulae at all. it was about il | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 04:45:07 PM | |
| >> Precisely. However, it has been applied in similar cases with varying degrees | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 04:33:12 PM | |
| You are more educated than what you pretend in the last two posts, are you not ? | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 04:08:18 PM | |
| >> Why would they do that? Applying that method in AMD's case would be novel. | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 03:52:49 PM | |
| OK, if the main point is whether it is a novel concept or not, then no, it is no | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 03:47:21 PM | |
| Dear Pete, The court rejected your argument and ruled for the defendant, and | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 12:55:45 PM | |
| >> OK, so you, I, and economaniac are on the same page then with regard to eco's | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 09:59:19 AM | |
| fpg, we've been over this and settled the fact we understand what the words mean | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 09:42:00 AM | |
| Dear Pete, I would be indebted to you if you can cite a single case that supp | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 09:12:41 AM | |
| >> AMD is pointing out that in an industry with high fixed costs and low margina | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 07:25:53 AM | |
| >> Sigh. It just gives a good explanation of the concept. A good explanation | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 06:32:26 AM | |
| >> But AMD is inventing new gimmicky accounting criteria. Interesting academic e | Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) | 05/20/2008 05:23:22 AM |
| Home | Hot | SubjectMarks | PeopleMarks | Keepers | Settings |
| Terms Of Use | Contact Us | Copyright/IP Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | FAQ |
