 Register |
|
|
| Profile for Sir Francis Drake |
| Add PeopleMark | Ignore Member | Send Private Message | Recent Posts |
| Posts by Sir Francis Drake |
| Message | Subject | Recs | Date/Time (ET) |
| zonder - wrong - I DO distinguish between civilian and military deaths. Howe | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/28/2002 12:52:46 PM | |
| btw. zonder, then given the indisputable, provable facts about casualties and al | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/28/2002 12:17:24 PM | |
| <i>Correct. That is exactly what I meant.</i> Well zonder, in that case, I sa | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/28/2002 12:01:35 PM | |
| zonder, as follow up to my last post, see the statistics: http://www.holocaus | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/28/2002 11:55:12 AM | |
| zonder - by what definition do you regard the nuking of two civilian cities as a | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/28/2002 11:44:04 AM | |
| Carl, I should think this is very germane wrt. your campaign to convince the for | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/28/2002 10:58:51 AM | |
| From the Libya article - certain Israelis must really hate this part: http:// | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 09:36:19 PM | |
| Libya http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-Libya-Arab-League.html | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 02:44:54 PM | |
| <i>I did not say that democracy was a protection.</i> No. But what you did im | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 01:38:00 PM | |
| <i>Smoot-Hawley is not a propos. There is nothing like so broad a protectionist | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 01:19:54 PM | |
| Hawkmoon, I rest my case. You ignored the very substance in the links I gave you | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 01:01:35 PM | |
| <i>Conservative Republicans delivered the votes on NAFTA and GATT.</i> They s | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 12:50:24 PM | |
| <i>Current conservative: pro- free trade, pro- deregulation, internationalist (f | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 11:46:44 AM | |
| Hawkmoon, as I've told you at the start of our exchanges, it really is necessary | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/24/2002 11:12:48 AM | |
| OK, time to call it a night. We certainly had fun today, I'm sure I'll roll arou | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 08:55:10 PM | |
| CB since you are located on a different planet and your communication gear is fl | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 08:48:51 PM | |
| Hawkmoon, surveying guide is hard work, take a look at what happened to guys who | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 08:27:05 PM | |
| Hawkmoon, re: Muslim culture contribution to world civilization (paraphrasing he | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 07:18:06 PM | |
| Yep CB, I did answer that, and I didn't even shuck and jive - Oops, have you bee | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 07:07:13 PM | |
| <i>Objectively false. You don't judge Sharon by his standards.</i> Errr... CB | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 06:58:55 PM | |
| C, there for those who can see :-) yourbuddy@lenscrafters.com P.S. Are you | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 06:42:09 PM | |
| Wow Rascal - good post. I absolutely agree with the guy. But such is life right | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 06:38:07 PM | |
| <i>Moral relativism, as opposed to objective morality. Different planets. No | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 06:27:20 PM | |
| Nadine, beep. Beep. Beep. Earth to Nadine, hello... hello... Just what can yo | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 05:44:36 PM | |
| <i>It is you who decided that "Arab" must be a genetic, not a cultural reference | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 05:31:37 PM | |
| CB - well, that's your choice. If you think that it is better for Israel <b>n | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 05:16:22 PM | |
| <i>How is it more "racist" than your statement Arab "culture" and "civilisations | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 04:59:30 PM | |
| <i>So how does your argument apply any less to the existence of Israel inside th | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 04:38:32 PM | |
| Well Hawkmoon, much to my surprise I find myself in almost 100% agreement with y | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 03:56:51 PM | |
| <i>It is the Arabs who are really good at hating.</i> Really, Nadine. Aren't | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 03:44:43 PM | |
| <i>I am a Jew and I also know the code -- and you've been using it.</i> Oh re | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 03:05:23 PM | |
| <i>SFD, have you checked the papers coming out of Tel Aviv and Riyadh lately? Do | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 02:45:39 PM | |
| <i>My understanding of the process is that the parties agreed that Israel would | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 02:07:07 PM | |
| NOW THAT IS FUNNY, LOL! CB - great rant by Orianna Fallaci indeed - sound like s | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 01:45:47 PM | |
| <i>The children of Palestine will not know peace until they stop the suicide bom | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 01:12:09 PM | |
| CB, you cannot make all Palestinian aspiration equal to Hamas/PIJ/Hezbollah. The | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 11:36:38 AM | |
| <i>in case you profoundly blew it, I apologize for tramping on your better senti | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 11:07:24 AM | |
| <i>The saddest thing of all is that most Israelis already see it. It is the Pale | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/23/2002 08:43:13 AM | |
| I'm going to have to call it a night. We'll resume tomorrow fresh for a new batt | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:48:08 PM | |
| <i>And an awful lot of unnecessary deaths would pave the path to that destinatio | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:42:37 PM | |
| <i>SMEARING THE ANTIWAR MOVEMENT</i> Yep, screaming anti-semitism and false a | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:39:54 PM | |
| Incidentally, to say that "SFD could find nothing wrong with Arafat" is not fact | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:34:09 PM | |
| <i>excellent point about the consequences of calling all criticisms of the Sharo | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:28:01 PM | |
| Follow up to recent cases of freedom of speech and the demagoguery surrounding t | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:13:23 PM | |
| frankw1900 you have just accused me of anti-semitism (plus all the Scandinavians | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 10:02:39 PM | |
| <i>unilateral non-negotiated settlement" is an oxymoron</i> take another loo | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 09:43:43 PM | |
| You are repeating yourself Nadine, and failing to address points I make: <i>S | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 09:33:26 PM | |
| Carl, I was making a point about territory. Of course you need the manpower to d | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 08:26:48 PM | |
| <i>Haven't you just been assuring me that withdrawing to an internationally reco | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 08:25:08 PM | |
| I say Israel is in the clear wrt. Lebanon in my book, because I'm willing to cut | Foreign Affairs Discussion Group | 10/22/2002 07:53:21 PM |
| Home | Hot | SubjectMarks | PeopleMarks | Keepers | Settings |
| Terms Of Use | Contact Us | Copyright/IP Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | FAQ |
