Profile for Sabrejet
Add PeopleMarkIgnore MemberSend Private MessageRecent Posts

Site Participation
Date Joined Apr 23 1996 User Level
Posts 1903 Boards Moderated0
PeopleMarks 8 Bans Issued 0
Ignored By 0 Bans Received 0

Personal Information
Occupation/Title: MoneyMaker
Location: Florida
Favorite Stocks: Tech, Pharm.
Investment Style: Day Trade
Investment Experience: Never long enough!
Interests and Hobbies: Hockey, Reading, Fishing, the Market!
Quote: Never Quit, Just Never Quit
Additional Info: Stay positive!
25 Most Recent SubjectsLast PostPosts
Green Bay Packers08-12-03 02:53 PM 2
Intel Corporation (INTC)08-08-02 05:52 PM 62
Lucent Technologies (LU)04-11-02 11:52 AM 97
Steve's Channelling Thread09-16-01 11:00 PM 207
Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,07-01-01 12:41 PM 20
VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED06-08-01 03:30 PM 8
Ciena IPO06-01-01 04:46 PM 3
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)02-08-01 04:29 PM 21
WCOM12-26-00 03:42 PM 17
Apple Inc.10-26-00 09:14 AM 55
America On-Line (AOL)10-16-00 11:32 AM 140
DELL10-04-00 05:37 PM 171
AQCB auqa clara bottling and distributing09-17-00 07:59 PM 6
MDD - Market Direction Discussion09-12-00 05:07 PM 3
Emulex, What Prospects?09-02-00 11:23 AM 10
Instinet After Hours08-29-00 08:30 PM 1
CLOWN-FREE ZONE... sorry, no clowns allowed07-31-00 04:05 PM 6
Nokia (NOK)07-29-00 12:29 PM 4
Akamai (AKAM)07-27-00 12:18 PM 7
Compaq07-24-00 09:21 PM 133
To YAHOO! or not to?!07-11-00 06:21 PM 31
Harmonic Lightwaves (HLIT)05-17-00 07:01 AM 1
AT&T05-03-00 08:50 PM 7
Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin05-01-00 07:08 AM 18
How high will Microsoft fly?04-24-00 06:34 PM 9
Read Last    Messages  
List Last    Messages  

Posts by Sabrejet
MessageSubjectRecsDate/Time (ET)
Hey C! I think the Pack may be in for long season. How about my Bill's?!!! Green Bay Packers 08/12/2003 02:53:39 PM
Thanks for the explanation Tech. I know there is a bit of difference between MT/Intel Corporation (INTC) 08/08/2002 05:52:53 PM
I was wondering if anyone could explain to me the difference between RAM that isIntel Corporation (INTC) 08/08/2002 04:54:14 PM
Would you agree that the bet now and only now is that the company will survive oLucent Technologies (LU) 04/11/2002 11:52:26 AM
I have never seen anything like this in all my years of owning stock! I can Lucent Technologies (LU) 04/11/2002 10:36:31 AM
No way in the world would LU and NT ever merge. Never ever. I'll stop therLucent Technologies (LU) 03/29/2002 09:13:50 PM
Why don't you just keep posting that article everyday until December that way anLucent Technologies (LU) 03/28/2002 09:40:34 PM
And they call that a CYA clause.Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/28/2002 02:36:06 PM
At least when you make an error you accept it! Unlike others, they will argue tiLucent Technologies (LU) 03/28/2002 01:57:51 PM
Paul, the "fear" is just like anything else in life. We tend to view the good thLucent Technologies (LU) 03/28/2002 10:03:30 AM
pretty arrogant of you. Frankly, if capex spending has bottomed and we see a revLucent Technologies (LU) 03/28/2002 08:23:02 AM
re"<i>Some small minor bounces here and there and in the end it will wind up setLucent Technologies (LU) 03/27/2002 08:25:01 AM
Good afternoon. It looks as though there is some "selling" today in LU on no newLucent Technologies (LU) 03/26/2002 01:41:14 PM
Lately, it's sort like if I wake up and read that my name is not in the obit's, Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/22/2002 08:49:12 AM
Thanks for the post Matt. That was a good read and I appreciate the posting! Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/21/2002 09:47:11 AM
I got a few more shares @4.17. It looks as though we may have put in a bottom...Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/20/2002 10:19:59 AM
Not much to say to you. I'll just let you keep doing your thing. Someone hereLucent Technologies (LU) 03/19/2002 02:41:30 PM
Nice opinion. No facts, but opinion just the same. I would bet to know that jLucent Technologies (LU) 03/19/2002 01:25:39 PM
What a mess out there. I bought shares for the long term and all I can say is thLucent Technologies (LU) 03/19/2002 10:36:41 AM
Technically speaking, we are still above the low set last week, that's a good thLucent Technologies (LU) 03/18/2002 09:09:45 PM
Today, there is still what seems to be a tremendous amount of pressure on the stLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 12:37:25 PM
Impristine, you got me on that! I have no idea what you meant. All those degreesLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 10:44:50 AM
Well, I've watched many a scenerio over the years concerning different ways to mLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 10:25:17 AM
Yeah, but the saying goes, bulls, bears and PIGS! Pigs get slaughtered. I guLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 10:03:59 AM
That dilution from say $6 to me should have brought the stock down to around $5.Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 10:01:20 AM
re:"<i>IF the telco market was still heathy, LU would have 5% market share and NLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 09:57:31 AM
If the convert is already completed what reason is there left to short other thaLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 09:50:47 AM
I understood the math but I assumed something and realized it after I had postedLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 09:40:46 AM
Thanks for the comparison. Question: "On the borrowed money an arb might pay fedLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 09:12:02 AM
The problem with that is the arbs lose all the way around. If the conversion wasLucent Technologies (LU) 03/14/2002 08:01:21 AM
sylvester80, you're o'k!!I like your attitude and you do good work digging up inLucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 04:27:56 PM
Man, I think that is jumping way too early on that(institutions), regardless of Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 04:17:46 PM
I think this is just a bit over done right here. In fact, I am processing here aLucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 03:59:27 PM
I see the class "act" is back! Also, it appears you can't help but take a fewLucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 02:39:58 PM
The deal is a lot better than Qwest and light years ahead of my worst fears! Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 01:09:29 PM
I find the article quite emotional, filled with innuendos and personal attacks. Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 10:50:44 AM
Dave, I agree on the bearish convrt' offering but I disagree on the bloated pig Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/13/2002 08:58:10 AM
My apologies for the implications. Sabre!Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 02:39:08 PM
Agree for once on the reading of the filings. But, to imply that current managemLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 02:36:35 PM
re: "I gave you five firms that lowered their numbers on LU today in my previousLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 02:15:30 PM
GVT, you don't know squat about the quarter. You make it sound like the Q was a Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 02:08:10 PM
Would you cut it out?! ST, where do you see LU going? I sure don't see $40 anytiLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:55:24 PM
I can see the concern of many but I got to tell you, the only item I found to boLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:48:39 PM
Take a look at the debt rating on LU a year ago. Wasn't it just off junk??? BLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:45:30 PM
re: I listened to CC this AM and was very disturbed by CEO comments about systemLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:43:50 PM
Would you be a little more optimistic about this!!! Come on, you come over here Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:41:23 PM
Agree on the dilution issue. I don't want to see that. But, I'm not too sure thaLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:30:35 PM
There was a consensus last week that NT would go to junk. LU has already addressLucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:28:46 PM
Thanks Ibexx. Sabre!Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:24:45 PM
I think that was just one trade. I saw that posted as a low but looking back at Lucent Technologies (LU) 03/12/2002 01:21:01 PM

Copyright © 1995-2013 Knight Sac Media. All rights reserved.